📚 Megathread Jonathan Yaniv charged & pleads guilty to death threat crimes against Chris Elston. - UPDATE: 6/23/22 Pleads Guilty(page 19) 7/27/22 Potential violation of probation(page 25)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
He's the perfect storm of being so awful that it's impossible to not want him to go down hard and such a perpetual content drought that him frying might be the only way we get another drop milk out of him.

I don't think it ends here though, I see him getting probation out of this one and jailtime being a factor when he goes up for the drama he caused at the strata with this on his record being used against him.
The guy's fucking dangerous, it ain't much to analyze. Some kid is gonna get hurt by this shitheel before long.
 
The guy's fucking dangerous, it ain't much to analyze. Some kid is gonna get hurt by this shitheel before long.
Canada's justice system is mega cucked though, his troon armor is like a full blown iron man suit up there. I mean, where do they put him if he goes to prison? No matter what they do someone's gonna get pissed off and it's gonna make the news. There's big incentive to defer doing anything about him until having not done anything about him before it was too late ruins some other bureaucrat's career.
 
Canada's justice system is mega cucked though, his troon armor is like a full blown iron man suit up there. I mean, where do they put him if he goes to prison? No matter what they do someone's gonna get pissed off and it's gonna make the news. There's big incentive to defer doing anything about him until having not done anything about him before it was too late ruins some other bureaucrat's career.

This is true across all Western countries, and it has nothing to do with Troon armor. The only people who actually get severely punished are those who oppose the government. This is why there's a renewed interest in guns. There is no faith that the police force can protect people. Just ask Kyle Rittenhouse.
 
Meowmix posted an article but not much more information than we already have:
JY pleads guilty

If I were a betting man, (I am neither a gambler nor a man), I would guess that the court is about to get less patient with the 'fucking thing'. Two recent conditional discharges, multiple charges pending including assaulting a senior, but most importantly he is charged with libel against an RCMP officer. Call me optimistic but it doesn't take a genius to figure out that JY needs a punishment with enough teeth to be a deterrent. Even if he gets a suspended sentence or a week ass probation order, the next one won't go so well. It is all adding up.
 
Knowing Cuckada, when it comes time for sentencing, the judge will sentence himself to prison for having the gall to demand justice from such a brave axe wound survivor during pride month in the middle of pride year. (which is every year in Canada.)
 
I suppose there isnt some "nuisance" law that all these very small convictions would fall under? Something along the lines of, you commit X small offences over Y period of time and you are labeled a legal nuisance and are now subject to more serious repercussions?
 
Him going to prison would only spawn more lolsuits, like the time he was sitting in a cell for a couple hours and managed to have an almost kinda sorta diabetic crisis and the based cops wouldn't give him his apple juice and tendies. (Don't remember the full deets, don't care to look it up.)

The facility that he would likely go to seems very big on activities.

This one's entire lifestyle right now is sitting on his ass and leaving his apartment once a day to wash his car and buy junk food.

Waking up at 6 am for a full day of activities sounds like a fucking nightmare for someone like that.
 
:semperfidelis:Semper Fi to that reporter he harassed.. I hope she has started a great chain of events to get him recognized again, hopefully by more figures of authority!
 
"Uttering threats" is the dumbest crime that exists. But as long as Yaniv and his pedo wound get dragged through the mud further, I like it.

Is uttering threats considered better or worse than loudly screaming threats? What about writing threats on a white board and pointing to them and raising an eyebrow? What about emailing threats and then saying "oh no I got hacked what did the hacker say to you????"
"Uttering Threats" in Canada is just their description of an Assault charge, "uttering" meaning "giving", like how "real property" does not mean "physically existing" but refers to fixed property and attached rights. You would be convicted of uttering threats if you wrote on a chalk board that you were going to murder someone.

Assaults

Uttering threats

  • 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat
    • (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
    • (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or
    • (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.
The punishment for 1a is a maximum of five years, 1b/c is two years
I'm actually very familiar with Canadian law surrounding this type of conviction.

There will be no community service and no jail time and no fines. Whoever is thinking that is delusional.

He will either get a suspended sentence for a year or two again at best or what's most likely is he will get 1-2 years of probation if history is a pointer. His probation conditions will be to 'keep the peace,' to not possess any weapons, a strict no contact order with Chris, and to remain living at his strata and notify and get court approval if he wants to move. That's it, that's all.

Failure to comply with any of the aforementioned probation conditions will trigger an instant warrant and/or immediate incarceration with basically no chance of bail for breech of probation. That breech would then cost him a couple months in jail. A breech in this case could be as simple as just tagging Chris in a tweet or having any more interactions with police.

If he manages to keep away from trouble he'll be fine but he's gonna be on a really short leash and when you're on probation it becomes especially true that "everything you say can and will be used against you" which doesn't bode well for a serial litigant like himself.
Exactly this, it's a minor crime to put you on the books and get you to stop acting like a moron, and gives the Crown the ability to throw you away for a long ass time if you actually do something stupid.
 
Look at that, there may just be a God after all.


The judge is probably going to give Jonathan a slap on the fingers and a wet, syrupy kiss on his freshly waxed sack, as well as a 10$ gift card to Tim Horton's, eh?
Naw, Canadian tire bux.
And no Hess truck for Christmas this year.

"uttering threats", for my own worry, does Canada really punish you for making a sideways smartass remark now?
 
"Uttering Threats" in Canada is just their description of an Assault charge, "uttering" meaning "giving", like how "real property" does not mean "physically existing" but refers to fixed property and attached rights. You would be convicted of uttering threats if you wrote on a chalk board that you were going to murder someone.

Looking at it it's likely a hold over from British law, we updated the statute's name to "language likely to cause a breach of the peace" and there is another one that covers the same thing but in a different set of circumstances.

For example - If I said to a friend "Mate your a lucky fucking sod I really want to kill you for getting that deal" that wouldn't be constituted as a threat under most circumstances, but if I said "I'm going to kill you you fucking cunt" to a random stranger or someone I have just had a negative interaction with that would be considered a breach of the peace and a arrestable (though not often charged) offence.

Technically if a police officer heard me say that to my friend I could hypothetically be arrested, but the Desk Sergeant and the CPS would toss it out unless said friend came to them and said no he's a danger to me and meant it meaning that it would go not where and the most I'd get would be "Please chose your language better in future" and the officer would get a talking to about stat padding, but if the same officer heard me say that after getting booted out of a pub by a doorman and I was arrested on suspicion they could charge me with it and it would likely stick especially if I was in possession of something that could be used as a weapon and I'd catch a charge for that as well and the other charge would be used to compound the charge.

It's one of those laws that's useful to have hanging around for the Police and Courts, it let's them add a little more "oomph" to other charges, and it can be used at protests and riots as well to quickly and legally deal with agitators before the bricks start flying, without having to resort to the Riot Act and it's shockingly effective. It can be abused and has been abused but it's a "At descension" sort of law so if I was getting mouth with a Policeman I could be charged with it and the bracelets slapped on me but it's highly unlikely it would go more than being stuck in the back of a police car / van till I calmed down and given a verbal caution.

It's a silly law for the most part but it can be useful to keep around, it's why when they update rules relating to traffic and road use, they keep the inclusion of Horses, Carrages or a Horse, Bicycles, Locomotives, skateboards, roller skates and all other non pedestrian means of transport, it's so they can arrest the guy who'd drunk trying to ride a bike he's more of a danger to himself than others and it's normally a case of charge him with that slap the cuffs on him issue a FPN and take them home to sleep it off. But the same law can be used to stop illegal pony races at 1am in rotherham when the pikeys get drunk and decide to use a dual carriageway as a impromptu racetrack.
 
So just a little update for the new eyeballs.

A lot of people are rolling their eyes saying that nothing will happen because this is probably a small misdemeanor charge and/or it’s Canada and Canada is the most cucked land on the planet earth.

Something that I don’t think has been featured is that this isn’t Yannivs only lawsuit. Jonnyboy has recently been served in new criminal lawsuit for liable against a police officer he Photoshoped the words “elder abuser” over And harassed his family.

He also just lost the lawsuit where he manhandled a rebel media reporter.

He also has another criminal case for false reporting a fire and/or beating up an old person or some shit coming down in the next few weeks.

This lawsuit/conviction is not what will end Yanniv but it’s definitely a piece of a puzzle. What a lot of Johnny’s detractors want is for there to be a record of criminal behavior. Johnny has gotten extremely lucky where a lot of his court dates have not resulted in a criminal record. Anglo courts are normally quite nice and trying to avoid giving someone a criminal record unless they absolutely have to. However Johnny is proving that he is a repeat offender and they can no longer not record these crimes, A lot of Johnny’s lost lawsuits normally end up with some sorts of deferred punishment with the understanding that if he reoffends then the punishment will come in full effect.

The tranny shield can only deflect so much fire before it cracks under the heat.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole