Female-aimed Trends That You Hate? - Sperg about recent trends you despise from media, make-up, social, etc

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wyróżnienie
So many current clothes marketed to children and teens barely pass school dress codes. I get it looks stylish, but majority of the shirts I see barely cover the midsection. I even see these kinds of clothes while trying to thrift at Platos Closet. It feels inescapable.
Like, I get it for a parent, you're shopping for new clothes for the school year and all you're presented with and what your child is exposed to is practically club wear. You're pretty much forced to buy something you know will cause an issue because it's something trendy and probably has characters your child likes on it.
 
The Crescent King powiedział(a):
There was a lot more diversity in clothing as well; pants, shorts, hoodies, jackets, graphic tees, occassional skirts, just normal teenage girl attire.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I recall the crop tops popping up in the early - mid 2010’s. They were more “acceptable,” similar to baby tee lengths today. I swear crop tops now just barely cover the breast area and the entire midriff section is exposed. They’re all made of thin, cheap materials so good luck wearing it after a few washes.

Makes me sick that skimpy clothing is advertised and pushed towards teenage girls. It just gets progressively worse. You age 5 years out of that and you’re expected to start covering up, even though you’re now an adult.

JambledUpWords powiedział(a):
It’s also just not very conductive to real life to have super lax dress codes, but I guess schools are too afraid of being called “sexist” for implementing them.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Public schools should require uniforms, it shouldn’t be limited to private schools only. I’ve always thought that’s how the way it should be, even as a kid.

Stabby_Pencil powiedział(a):
The trend where we are told to 'be kind' to every single group. Basically requiring every woman to be an activist nanny when they don't want to.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
“Be kind” means “put your morals aside and be a doormat.” I’m sick to death of hearing about it - fuck you, stay out of female restrooms, stop flaunting your degeneracy in public, get out of my country.
 
Rolex powiedział(a):
Progressive parents are so deluded by the idea that "well men shouldn't be looking!!"
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Who exactly is supposed to be looking at them, then? I mean, boys their age are probably still gonna be in their "girls are icky" phase so it's not going to be them. Other women??

The only theory I can think of is that it's simply a milder form of the pageant mom phenomena.
 
Stabby_Pencil powiedział(a):
The trend where we are told to 'be kind' to every single group. Basically requiring every woman to be an activist nanny when they don't want to.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The liberals don't realize "kindness" doesn't mean "performatively nice 24/7. Kindness includes calling out the self destructive behaviors that these groups want to keep cause of they kulcha.
 
Señora Airi powiedział(a):
The liberals don't realize "kindness" doesn't mean "performatively nice 24/7. Kindness includes calling out the self destructive behaviors that these groups want to keep cause of they kulcha.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Kindness also includes protecting the vulnerable, particularly children, the elderly, and tards. It doesn't mean being passive and permissive, and it certainly doesn't mean letting grown men pretend to be vulnerable at the expense of the actually vulnerable (see: troons, undocumented men, men with "muh mentals" or a similar sob story, any man who tries to get around any safeguarding checks). Women are supposed to be protectors, even if we don't have our own kids, we're the mama bears of the collective.
Look at other species' females: mama bears most obviously, but even gentle herbivores like cows and sheep will go berserk if anything threatens even one of their young. The first thing you learn about farm safety is "never get between a mother and her baby", no matter what the animal is. The mother raises the alarm and all the females circle to defend the baby and chase off or kill the threat. That's how we are naturally, but all this "UwU be kind!" shit teaches us to disregard our instincts and be doormats for predators.
 
Sex dolls have become really realistic these days, here's a woman walking around with hers. You can still tell it's fake by the dead-eye stare, though.
owl_wide_1440_35eeadaad0e5e1b36f9865ae6aec8b31.webp
:cryblood:
 
Hongourable Madisha powiedział(a):
Kindness also includes protecting the vulnerable, particularly children, the elderly, and tards. It doesn't mean being passive and permissive, and it certainly doesn't mean letting grown men pretend to be vulnerable at the expense of the actually vulnerable (see: troons, undocumented men, men with "muh mentals" or a similar sob story, any man who tries to get around any safeguarding checks). Women are supposed to be protectors, even if we don't have our own kids, we're the mama bears of the collective.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Do you post anything like this on social media or share with your girl friends? As a man in a super liberal area, I try to and the vocal libtard women shit all over it. Women seem to only rage at the things they're allowed to, which is impossible to explain without being called sexist.

Like women have the backing of men to scream at men for abortions, but none to scream at men who literally appropriated womanhood and took over their spaces. It's frustrating as hell. Women will delude themselves into believing murdering their preborn children is their big "right" to fight for and call anyone opposed to it heartless. wtf, stop letting dude's cream pie you. Why aren't we fighting for your actual right to the word "woman" and all that comes with it?
high and tired powiedział(a):
“Be kind” means “put your morals aside and be a doormat.” I’m sick to death of hearing about it - fuck you, stay out of female restrooms, stop flaunting your degeneracy in public, get out of my country.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Yes. I swear, terms like "homophobic" and "xenophobic" are "racist" and all the others are just used to tone police and silence people with legitimate gripes. We already have words to describe shit we shouldn't do to vulnerable groups. Blanket protections on everybody in a group are retarded.

Few care that same-sex attracted people exist, but you'd be branded a homophobe for pointing out their overrepresentation in sex crimes against children. Christians are now evil bigots despite doing tons of good for the community that goes unmentioned. Much like deranged men get a blanket pass once they're "transwomen," they blame the clergy solely for the child sexual abuse. Sure, blame them for covering it up, but the LGBTQ+UT8YHGFE somehow miss that it was men abusing little boys mostly. Smfh.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I don't wanna get cancelled for hating gays or whatever but I miss it when female aimed media had decent f/m romances. Nowadays, the women are peak independent that somehow make time for a female love interest while the world ends but god forbid she hooks up with a man. For what it's worth, I do support lgb people. But if you're making a commercial work aimed at all women, you're bound alienate a lot of normies by doing so.

Make it niche if you must, but don't call people bigots for wanting to draw, write, or create media centered on what they're attracted to. Idk, I've been in spaces were plenty of SSA women whine about the lack of gnc gay bitches when like, can't you just learn how to write and draw? Make your own content. It be better if more lesbian and bi women make the media they wanna see than wait for a straight man to ruin it with fetishbait.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
weirdMcGee powiedział(a):
I don't wanna get cancelled for hating gays or whatever but I miss it when female aimed media had decent f/m romances. Nowadays, the women are peak independent that somehow make time for a female love interest while the world ends but god forbid she hooks up with a man.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's crazy to me that the last Disney Animated Studios movie with a straight romance between the leads was Tangled. It's been 15 years since the studio known for romance, especially in their princess movies, has given the people what they want. Now you have desperate tweens shipping Mirabel with her uncle and women having mental breakdowns about the cut romance with the star in Wish.
 
Arbiter powiedział(a):
It's crazy to me that the last Disney Animated Studios movie with a straight romance between the leads was Tangled. It's been 15 years since the studio known for romance, especially in their princess movies, has given the people what they want. Now you have desperate tweens shipping Mirabel with her uncle and women having mental breakdowns about the cut romance with the star in Wish.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
If disney really wanted them to be gay, they should've but I guess they needed some way to appease the karens and gays in hopes of more money. I know not all stories need romance or anything, but it's weird how disney wants to so desperately seem pc but they never go all the way through probably because if they did, they'd have have to censor it in other countries that really really hate gay people. They did it with lightyear and onward, since they there was a no well in hell they'd get away with it. It's like they've forgotten why women watch their shit in the first place.
 
This has probably been said already, but Jirai Kei is very unnerving to me even as most of my 'friends' seem to be into it. I liked the Kogal aesthethes but there's something deeply sinister about the whole subculture. It reminds me a lot of the Columbiner community, which I did fall for when I was younger, so I'm more than aware on how these retards get.
 
ShiNeSeNSei powiedział(a):
This has probably been said already, but Jirai Kei is very unnerving to me even as most of my 'friends' seem to be into it. I liked the Kogal aesthethes but there's something deeply sinister about the whole subculture. It reminds me a lot of the Columbiner community, which I did fall for when I was younger, so I'm more than aware on how these retards get.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I was able to google what Jirai Kei is, but what is the Columbiner community?
 
California Newt powiedział(a):
I always think it's interesting whenever women use these looksmaxxing arguments when there's a debate over makeup etc.. I'm not arguing against it; I just notice that it's the exact same reasoning you see male incels use to explain why they need to mew.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Men have never had to perform the same beauty expectations women have, so their complaining about "having" to perform beauty rituals should be taken with a grain of salt since any expectation of their appearance feels unfair to them. Saying women are taking arguments from looksmaxxers is backwards.
 
Suits. I think uniforms are a bit more sexy despite being just as prudish. But maybe it's what the suit represents that turns me off? I don't feel this way when there's more going on like a three piece or a guy in a suit vest with rolled up sleeves. That's so fucking hot but then you got suits which look so mid by comparison like there's nothing going, no visual interest, no rizz, no sense of confidence. They look like a douche who's gonna tell you you're fired. Give me some improper form, anything.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole