💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
One such town decided to murder a dude and then covered it up for 30 years, until the statute of limitations ran out.
One could say it was done in the name of the greater good.

hot-fuzz-greater-good.gif
 
MNPR just living rent free in Nick’s head is just the funniest shit ever, and the commitment to dropping this information only when Nick Streams it’s an added bonus. Everything that has happened Nick is your fault, brought on by your actions. I can’t imagine being so egotistical that during a hearing for felony possession where my kid tested positive for heavy use of cocaine to say “Your honor I’ve been called smart my whole life”. Nick might go to jail before my man BMJ at this rate.
 
All Nick Rekieta has to do is post documentation that proves everything he is claiming about his eight year old daughter testing positive for cocaine.

Nick hasn’t done that because the documentation proves he’s lying.

Nick will not do so in the future because the documentation proves he’s lying.

He will keep trying to complicate matters, but it’s just that simple.
If everything Nick has said about the CPS investigation is true, then everything after the June 6th hearing is good for him; he cooperated, tested clean, everybody loved him and admired his tidy, spacious house, and his daughter didn't test positive a second time. It would be beneficial to Nick to release the whole file, and beneficial to the children, too, because it would show they have a normal life and counteract the narrative that they must be deeply traumatized and in need of therapy. Why Nick doesn't move to have it unsealed is a mystery.

This, more than anything, confirms to me that Nick learnt absolutely nothing. He tried to pull the same stunt with Null before, once when they were on better terms with the Monty comments and once with the document claiming his daughter tested positive for cocaine. It hasn't worked before, the retard keeps banging his head against the Null wall until it gives and it only served to confirm that the posts were accurate. He would have better odds of getting it removed by making an account and reporting it.
I think it's the NPD thing where he thinks he did everything right, and the outcome he wanted was on the right side of history. He can't understand why his efforts failed, and figures that if he tweaks his approach with just the right argument, then Josh will have to fall in line. I'm sure he has plenty of experience arguing his parents and his wife and children into compliance, and he's had it work with people on the internet as well. The fact it failed must be infuriating and I imagine he's trying it again in part as a way to relitigate his previous losses and finally get Josh to admit he was right all along.
 
I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
None.

The entire site has committed high treason (lol, Barnes) against Rekieta Law by no longer unconditionally sucking his dick as of two and a half years ago.

Nick has still not gotten over it, and since he still thinks of himself as a social media expert, he really thinks he can browbeat Null into doing whatever he wants. He's insane now.

So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right?
It happened during Weebwars, to his benefit.

Here's a refresher:


There is little functional difference between what JosephTX did with Ron's divorce, and what MNPR did with those CHIPS case files. Yet Nick wants a different standard applied for MNPR.

EDIT TO ADD: Yes, JospehTX would later get banned, but not for getting and sharing Ron's divorce docket. It's possible Nick's damaged brain doesn't comprehend or remember what happened there.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
None.

The entire site has committed high treason (lol, Barnes) against Rekieta Law by no longer unconditionally sucking his dick as of two and a half years ago.

Nick has still not gotten over it, and since he still thinks of himself as a social media expert, he really thinks he can browbeat Null into doing whatever he wants. He's insane now.


It happened during Weebwars, to his benefit.

Here's a refresher:


There is little functional difference between what JosephTX did with Ron's divorce, and what MNPR did with those CHIPS case files. Yet Nick wants a different standard applied for MNPR.
I'm fascinated with that handwriting.

We have so many stories of him being angry with Kayla and April from the Qover and immediate post-Qover days.
Anf this is another way it is 100% those children were aware and were affected. Drunk and high people argue like barbarians - vicious and aggressive. And kids see this and know that mom & dad, or dad & girlfriend, are out of control. And they know why.
 
Branca is gonna cut him. He's going to realize very quickly that its costing him views and nick just comes off as so fuckin sleazy.
Nick is for sure hurting him. This has to be embarassing as fuck. Especially since Branca has been really pushing into the MAGA arena and now they're seeing this weird retard hanging around.

He won't cut Nick. It will be easier to let Nick lose his interest in about a week or so and let things taper off.
 
Josh replied: "Stop cheating on your wife."
Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."

Skelly leaves out the rest of the conversation that likely happened on the worst day of his life with star trek fans.

Nick: "Kayla, I can't believe you're cheating on me."
Kayla: "I don't care what you think."
N: "Who else have you cheated with??"
K: "Let's see: the theater people, church people, star trek people. Lots."
N: "How would you feel if I cheated on you?!?"
K: "I don't care who you fuck as long as it's not me."

Fast Forward:
Nick: : "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."
 
I assume the “I never cheated on my wife” is just Nick’s mental gymnastics to explain how Kayla consented to him plowing a Minnesota 6… and prostitutes. Or maybe not consent but just accepted it so long as her meds were filled and she had Star Trek to watch.
 
Pure speculation and, yes, it's countered by legal docs that say the kids did not know about drugs.

So, perhaps, a kid was more concerned about the polycule - unable to make out the drugs - but the adults could do so.

The questioning was about knowledge of what drugs are. This was to assess whether the kids were doing drugs. A 12-year-old with intimate knowledge of what marijuana looks like, how to smoke it, etc, is a candidate for use assessment. Same for a 9 y/o exposed to cocaine. If they knew what it was, it changes the risk assessment. CPS was strictly assessing the children for their health and safety.

Nick wants us to believe everything was about him so he twists everything into being a way to accuse him of wrongdoing. In fact, they never needed it as he recorded himself coked out and drunk while the kids were home.

The County prosecutor/CPS did an excellent job of separating the prosecution from the kids welfare. They very deliberately made it so that no child could ever blame themselves for dads conviction. They weren't going to ever testify for the state so no incriminating statement were needed nor were they attempted.
 
The County prosecutor/CPS did an excellent job of separating the prosecution from the kids welfare. They very deliberately made it so that no child could ever blame themselves for dads conviction. They weren't going to ever testify for the state so no incriminating statement were needed nor were they attempted.
You make a good point. Nick should be thankful his kids were removed from the house when they were. And in addition for the reason you gave, it also protected them from what was no doubt a (more) horrible, messy(ier), (more) terrible period in that home. And he & Kayla would never have had the humility and presence of mind to have them go be elsewhere for awhile, even though it was the best thing for them.
 
Maybe Nick will enjoy getting cucked by the state. He liked being cucked by the BBC at hedonism, he liked being cucked by Aaron and whoever else. It's his thing. He's into it.
 
By his own admission and the statements of people like Aaron and Coomerlot, he has spent likely tens of thousands of dollars funding that illegal drug market of Minnesota.

That is drug producers threatening innocent people into harvesting, baking and cutting cocaine. That is the death of many covertly smuggling drugs over borders, and promoting the production of a substances that ruin lives.
My main objection to cocaine in particular is that there is no "fair trade" cocaine where you can buy it and have some assurance that it didn't come from literal slaves. It's pretty much impossible to get without directly contributing to mass human suffering. Other stuff doesn't have that necessarily attached to it like coke, nobody is getting their hands chopped off over a few miss-appropriated back pills and some mid-west basement weed.
 
And normally they do not really go hard on kids with questions, unless the situation is much much worse.
The goal isn't to traumatize them.

If Daddy Nick properly prepared them in advance to not spill info, there isn't anything they can do about it.
Oh, to be a fly on the wall for that prep-talk!

"Well, you see kids, you can't trust the government!"
> snorts coke
"They're going to say and do all sorts of things that are against your best interests!"
> mainlines ketamine
"The important thing is: their judgement just can't be trusted!"
> drops shrooms
"They're going to take every unfair advantage to make us all look silly!""
> injects acid into eyeballs
"Now, think you kids could do some laundry? Auntie April and I were fucking in the laundry room, and it's getting pretty cramped..."

My main objection to cocaine in particular is that there is no "fair trade" cocaine where you can buy it and have some assurance that it didn't come from literal slaves. It's pretty much impossible to get without directly contributing to mass human suffering. Other stuff doesn't have that necessarily attached to it like coke, nobody is getting their hands chopped off over a few miss-appropriated back pills and some mid-west basement weed.
Really? Because for me, it'd be the fentanyl.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole