💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Theory 2: There was no such typo and Nick initially planned to continue that thought with a subsequent text's manipulative appeal to empathy about how Null is such "a good person" as to surely recognize that April's DFE's flight from the Internet signifies how she is now an innocent civilian whose privacy should be held sacrosanct in perpetuity, but then, as Nick got halfway through typing that subsequent text and realized how retarded it sounds when considering how everything April has publicly said and done has made her a public figure in perpetuity and attempting to control the narrative to an Internet audience is nonsensical, Nick gave up on that follow-through and deleted its predicate as well. As Kevin Brennan recently put it best, "it's a little late to not want to be a public figure," don't ya think?

Theory 3: After Nick and/or April woke up on Sunday at noonish as would be expected from either or both of them, a flailing BPD meltdown ensued in a Signal chat between the two of them in reaction to her doxxing on Saturday night, and she insisted that Nick throw his immeasurable weight around to get Null to take that off the gosh danged Internet, to which Nick dutifully made the attempt just to be able to tell her he tried, even though he already knew full well why that burned bridge's ashes would slip right through his fingers. Then, as Nick was frantically swiping back and forth between two or more Signal chats, he glimpsed some BPD rambling from April about how "I'm a terrible person" and "I guess I must deserve all of this following me for the rest of my life," to which he instinctually fired off a perfunctory "you are a good person" response to her, not realizing then that he was in the wrong thread, after which he deleted it upon realizing he was in the wrong thread.

Theory 4: Nick knew full well that his attempt would fail, but wanted to get that failure on the record so that, when he trots April out to file a police report (and/or HRO petition) for stalking as any dutiful sister-wife should, she could throw in the kitchen sink that the Qover tried its darnedest to get KF's admin to remove the contraband and his refusal left them with no recourse, so there is no choice but for the Qover to instigate a criminal search warrant (and/or civil subpoena) certain to identify the underlying culprit. If so, presumably the aftermath would just end up relegated to one of Null's "mail bag" threads sometime after any associated gag order is eventually lifted, for all the world to see.

Theory 5: Nick is a quavering pussy who won't do shit because he knows he has too much to hide, and consequently we'll never get to know whatever the fuck his deleted text meant.
My pet theory is: it was some coke-brain Random Access Humor on Nick's part. Something to the effect of:

:walker::really: ~ "wait, I know, I'll write that Josh is a good person, and then immediately delete/retract it, thus implying cleverly that I have reconsidered my position, and perhaps Josh is NOT a good person! HAHA, that's the ticket! And then Josh will fly into hysterics, trying to decode my inscrutible machinations! I bet he pees or poops his pants! Yeah!"
 
What makes me slightly MATI, is that if the children *did* see something, there were ill-equipped to deal with it due to their 1) age and immaturity and 2) their dependence on Nick and Kayla for their food and general welfare or 3) both. The thought of them knowing something was 'wrong' (or totally broken) but being unable to express it (out of innocence or fear) is a horrifying thought. This is further compounded by Nick's insistence that 'everything is fine' and touting their 'great relationship'.

Even if the kids saw nothing and knew nothing, this bullshit was still as abusive as fuck as far as I'm concerned. While parents aren't supposed to be at the beck and call of their children 24/7, if they're devoting their attention to sexual fun and games with another couple while snorting cocaine, ketamine and MDMA -- that in and of itself is child abuse. They're putting their desire to get high and engage in sexual degeneracy ahead of their children's needs and well being.

For all the justified critique of CPS, I think Kandiyohi County acted exactly as I'd want a CPS to act in this case. Scoop up the kids and take them into care while you assess the situation. Ideally, locating them with family to minimize disruption and distress. Then focus on bringing the parents into compliance with what most people regard as normal family life. Kick out the whore. Tip out the booze. Start monitoring the urine. Gradually begin supervised visits until such time as it's deemed safe to let the kids go back -- and then maintain monitoring until you're confident they've changed their ways.
 
One of Nick's biggest complaints about Aaron, post-arrest, is that he's the one who made the details public about the polycule when Kayla and April preferred to be private.
That's incredible. It would have all been discovered anyway, regardless of Balldo Bull's insertions (both literally and figuratively).
Did he forget that they got arrested?
So how does one adequately explain why aside from Wife, there's a Minnesotan fleshlight found at his premise with cut cocaine using her credit card?
Then said Minnesotan fleshlight attended zoom calls FROM THIS RETARD'S STUDIO??!
And she posted photos from his second bunker with decorations and merchandise referencing his show??!
What kind of conclusion would any normal human being draw?
AND he followed both of them on Instagram prior to the Qover. I immediately recognised the Balldo Bull and fleshlight during that skibidi bathtub stream because of the Instagram follow list I kept.
Your bull's not coming back, Nicky.


"So what if I did give her cocaine, at least she wasn't hospitalised, did you know if your kid drank bleach or played with kitchen knives or licked a mains outlet or if you cooked bad chicken, they'll be hospitalised? Checkmate Scandinavian incel prude stalker Karen, enjoy prison."


Plenty of us have done some shit we’re not proud of, and “believe in redemption”.
The only redemption for a child doser is Treblinka.

Nick is amusingly well-versed in substance analysis.
Wyświetl załącznik 7276009
>Expert witness
>CAN produce
Sorry but I'd need the term "can" defined precisely. Under what set of circumstances would a test produce results that's almost a fifth off? Presumably if it's 18% higher, it can also be lower right?
And how does this relate to your child you dosed with cocaine?

If you look at yesterday’s tweet spree, it’s easy to see why he slept through his alarms—he just couldn’t stop tweeting.
He was up Tweeting and seething until 6am in the morning, yet we're supposed to believe that's "gainful employment".

Wyświetl załącznik 7277026

Or be like Nick and add at least eight hours of chatting in YouTube streams to the 12 - 14 hours on Twitter.

His guy-who-has-it-all-figured-out posturing was always irritating, but it’s downright unbearable now that the shitty gutter that is his life makes the Ganges look sterile.
When is he releasing the "How to be a successful YouTuber" series?
 
Did he forget that they got arrested?
So how does one adequately explain why aside from Wife, there's a Minnesotan fleshlight found at his premise with cut cocaine using her credit card?
Nick conveniently forgets this part. He openly bragged about his relationship with the Imholtes. April openly joked about swinging in the Hot Tub stream. There were suspicions they were already part of the "lifestyle" thanks to Nick taking BBC in Jamaica.

Without this, Kino Casino wouldn't have the questions to ask Aaron in which he guillotined the Qover. He didn't just go on a endless tirade, he was a given series of questions and made responses
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
It also proves without a shadow of a doubt that Nick's fucking retarded (if you needed nore evidence) if he thinks, after all this time, asking Null nicely to take his shit down will actually work for once.

Exactly. I'm finding this Null/Nick Signal chat issue mystifying for some of the most obvious reasons.
  • From Nick's own words, doxxing is not illegal (though a couple of states are close to making it so).
  • Nick knows (or should know) that eventually the Farms would have found out April was living in Willmar. April's a local celebrity in a high-profile case in which many locals justifiably pay attention. Hell, a nosy Karen could follow her home from Walmart and take some pictures from their car as a 1x thing. That's not stalking. There's no threat.
  • Legally speaking, April is a public figure via STMS. Several members of SCOTUS have had protestors on their front lawns, with no arrests made because SCOTUS members are public figures. (I know, I'm mangling the letter of the law here, but you get the point.) Point: 15 people could show up on public property in front of April's home with signs screaming "SIDEWHORE; GET OUT!" and it would be perfectly legal as long as they were peaceful. That's called free speech.
  • If April wanted to be a private person, she would have gone home to Litchfield. She didn't. She's chosen to remain in the eye of the storm.
  • April is skilled with firearms through hunting and the gun club/range she was a member of (her FB is deleted, but the evidence is there). She is allowed to own firearms. Also, Ring cams cost $100. The girl is fine.
  • No one wants to see any harm to her. Even with all the hyperbolic/humor posts ITT, I've never seen anyone wish her physical harm.
  • Recently, Nick has peddled to many of his balldowashers and the Dabbleverse that April has a boyfriend (not Nick) - Melton's said that a few times. I was willing to entertain that until Nick DMed Null to white knight for her. It's almost as if Nick is doing April's bidding.
 
I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
Why is this faggot skelly trying to pick up MY BROOM?
So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right? Nicky, you're not special. You're a child doser, you're worse than all of them combined. Oh, I guess that means you are special in a way.

He wants to hide his fleshlight, we get it.
7286 gang rise up!

Edit: So he claimed the user was "stalking" which is a "site violation"?
Prove it.
Ethan Ralph 🐷 who snapped photos of the finely dressed lady and gentlemen who attended one of Skelly's hearings wasn't deleted for stalking, why should anyone touch this?
I still remember when this cuck fag thanked Josh for "deleting his thread" while clearly a subforum was being made.
Buckbroken cuck skeleton.

Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."
This reads like something one of us would write with the Skelly Tomlinson meme.
Who says that? What a cuck.

Juju is on Melton's show. Nick is in chat, proudly proclaiming he's beating the Toe in views.
Wyświetl załącznik 7278187Wyświetl załącznik 7278199
Wyświetl załącznik 7278291
STMS has 13.2k subscribers
Skelly Rekieta "Law [sic]" still has above 400k.
What is this faggot bragging about? "I have more viewers than a literally who show with under 15k subscribers"?
Brag worthy???

The test results showed levels you would expect from a regular user. Either they gave her coke or she was somehow ingesting it on a frequent basis. A one-off accident doesn't explain it away.
Also how much environmental exposure should occur before it becomes gross negligence?
Let's just entertain the idea that her environmental exposure was so prolonged it blew out the instruments' upper bound yielding a >5000 (ie it could be 25,000, we don't know). Now what?
I've read a few case laws where a suitable and smart lawyer was able to dismiss very low, borderline cutoff results citing environmental exposure. NONE of them had levels above 1000**, let alone 5000.
The parent(s) in question always at least showed they're aware of "proper" drug use and claims they thought a good wiping will prevent accidental ingestion.

Was she swimming in cocaine dust?

**: there were one or two cases with just above 1000, but a retest using proper decontamination cycles dropped it to far below the cut-off.
Cut-off = 500.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Also how much environmental exposure should occur before it becomes gross negligence?
I honestly feel that it is silly to even let Rekieta try and gaslight his way through the evil that he does. It's better to use common sense and most likely explanations until they are proven wrong. And with Rekieta none of the reasonable conclusions were wrong. Some of the wild speculation was wrong but not the basic and reasonable things.
Unfortunately taking that approach with test results showing regular drug use would indicate that a child regularly used cocaine. For whatever reason, however ingested.
Sickening.
 
I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.

CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.

I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.

I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.

I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
Why is this faggot skelly trying to pick up MY BROOM?
So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right? Nicky, you're not special. You're a child doser, you're worse than all of them combined. Oh, I guess that means you are special in a way.

Reality: The rule against hurting Nick's feelings.

Nick is just upset he cannot prove for certain who they are and he is seething a whomever he can. Nick abusively lashes out at whomever is in reach when he is hurt. We have so many stories of him being angry with Kayla and April from the Qover and immediate post-Qover days. We see his pattern of excuses on the show with 'driving muk KEEDS!', 'unexpected date night', and the like. He lashed out at @elb and Cynthia when they became critical of him. Need we mention 'Dear John?' The Eric July stream, his multiple attempts to censor the thread with shower texts to Josh... It is clear a pattern as day.

MNPR has not violated a site rule. They have unusual access to information which they post for discussion (and I am sure they probably lurk or discuss it on an alt), but they do NOT make direct calls to action or address Nick directly. They are simply a dedicated alog. In many ways, they subvert the typical alog role, but they do so successfully: Their segmented release of the CPS transcript was definitely non-attention whoring or annoying and navigated a very tight rope to do so. They also do not engage in the discussion openly to collect cachet among us. They are clearly invested, but know their place (at least to-date) and do not step beyond it. I do not know their ultimate goal, but I suspect it is a nobler one than 'just laughing', and I hope that they continue on the path of wisdom they have started.
 
I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.

I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.
And normally they do not really go hard on kids with questions, unless the situation is much much worse.
The goal isn't to traumatize them.

If Daddy Nick properly prepared them in advance to not spill info, there isn't anything they can do about it.
 
It occurs to me some frens may not understand the deep culture behaviors in a small, rural US community, Nick sure doesn't.

The entire town knows everything his entire family does, it's a level of social surveillance the CCP can only dream of. Children are being direct to make friends, Nick's kids are being taught how many safe homes there are, and their locations. There at least 3 SM groups breaking up the monitoring tasks, and a town council of mothers to decide, when the town must act to protect the children.

One such town decided to murder a dude and then covered it up for 30 years, until the statute of limitations ran out.
 
The only thing Nick has anymore is to sow confusion and try to get people to make innocuous mistakes that he can try to grind content out of.

Dick taught him well.
 
I watched the HBO documentary series on the Karen Reed trial and I gotta say that April running over Nick with her Dodge Ram while they're both hammered drunk is not out of the question atp
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole