SparselyFarcical
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 23 Lut 2024
What would take nick to say fuck it and just snort lines of coke in front of the audience?
A second consecutive loss in Montagraph's defamation case against him
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
What would take nick to say fuck it and just snort lines of coke in front of the audience?
He's either showering you with praise, showering you with insults, or showering you with threats....just another reason why we call them "shower calls."but showers on the praise when he wants something done on his behalf.
me too, it less your parents and more your grandparents nutrition, growing a big body doesnt alot of energy and matterialIt was inconvenient since I worked a lot in Asia
My pet theory is: it was some coke-brain Random Access Humor on Nick's part. Something to the effect of:Theory 2: There was no such typo and Nick initially planned to continue that thought with a subsequent text's manipulative appeal to empathy about how Null is such "a good person" as to surely recognize that April's DFE's flight from the Internet signifies how she is now an innocent civilian whose privacy should be held sacrosanct in perpetuity, but then, as Nick got halfway through typing that subsequent text and realized how retarded it sounds when considering how everything April has publicly said and done has made her a public figure in perpetuity and attempting to control the narrative to an Internet audience is nonsensical, Nick gave up on that follow-through and deleted its predicate as well. As Kevin Brennan recently put it best, "it's a little late to not want to be a public figure," don't ya think?
Theory 3: After Nick and/or April woke up on Sunday at noonish as would be expected from either or both of them, a flailing BPD meltdown ensued in a Signal chat between the two of them in reaction to her doxxing on Saturday night, and she insisted that Nick throw his immeasurable weight around to get Null to take that off the gosh danged Internet, to which Nick dutifully made the attempt just to be able to tell her he tried, even though he already knew full well why that burned bridge's ashes would slip right through his fingers. Then, as Nick was frantically swiping back and forth between two or more Signal chats, he glimpsed some BPD rambling from April about how "I'm a terrible person" and "I guess I must deserve all of this following me for the rest of my life," to which he instinctually fired off a perfunctory "you are a good person" response to her, not realizing then that he was in the wrong thread, after which he deleted it upon realizing he was in the wrong thread.
Theory 4: Nick knew full well that his attempt would fail, but wanted to get that failure on the record so that, when he trots April out to file a police report (and/or HRO petition) for stalking as any dutiful sister-wife should, she could throw in the kitchen sink that the Qover tried its darnedest to get KF's admin to remove the contraband and his refusal left them with no recourse, so there is no choice but for the Qover to instigate a criminal search warrant (and/or civil subpoena) certain to identify the underlying culprit. If so, presumably the aftermath would just end up relegated to one of Null's "mail bag" threads sometime after any associated gag order is eventually lifted, for all the world to see.
Theory 5: Nick is a quavering pussy who won't do shit because he knows he has too much to hide, and consequently we'll never get to know whatever the fuck his deleted text meant.

What makes me slightly MATI, is that if the children *did* see something, there were ill-equipped to deal with it due to their 1) age and immaturity and 2) their dependence on Nick and Kayla for their food and general welfare or 3) both. The thought of them knowing something was 'wrong' (or totally broken) but being unable to express it (out of innocence or fear) is a horrifying thought. This is further compounded by Nick's insistence that 'everything is fine' and touting their 'great relationship'.
That’s close to confirmation that it’s Aprils current info alright. Part of the fun right now is watching him proceed with stupider & stupider things. Especially the words he says, plus they’re always said in such a faggy way.Null talked about it on MATI for April 25th. Nick wanted @MNPublicRecords banned and those pictures of April's truck taken down,
Soooooo much projection.
That's incredible. It would have all been discovered anyway, regardless of Balldo Bull's insertions (both literally and figuratively).One of Nick's biggest complaints about Aaron, post-arrest, is that he's the one who made the details public about the polycule when Kayla and April preferred to be private.
"So what if I did give her cocaine, at least she wasn't hospitalised, did you know if your kid drank bleach or played with kitchen knives or licked a mains outlet or if you cooked bad chicken, they'll be hospitalised? Checkmate Scandinavian incel prude stalker Karen, enjoy prison."
The only redemption for a child doser is Treblinka.Plenty of us have done some shit we’re not proud of, and “believe in redemption”.
>Expert witnessNick is amusingly well-versed in substance analysis.
Wyświetl załącznik 7276009
He was up Tweeting and seething until 6am in the morning, yet we're supposed to believe that's "gainful employment".If you look at yesterday’s tweet spree, it’s easy to see why he slept through his alarms—he just couldn’t stop tweeting.
When is he releasing the "How to be a successful YouTuber" series?Wyświetl załącznik 7277026
Or be like Nick and add at least eight hours of chatting in YouTube streams to the 12 - 14 hours on Twitter.
His guy-who-has-it-all-figured-out posturing was always irritating, but it’s downright unbearable now that the shitty gutter that is his life makes the Ganges look sterile.
Nick conveniently forgets this part. He openly bragged about his relationship with the Imholtes. April openly joked about swinging in the Hot Tub stream. There were suspicions they were already part of the "lifestyle" thanks to Nick taking BBC in Jamaica.Did he forget that they got arrested?
So how does one adequately explain why aside from Wife, there's a Minnesotan fleshlight found at his premise with cut cocaine using her credit card?
It also proves without a shadow of a doubt that Nick's fucking retarded (if you needed nore evidence) if he thinks, after all this time, asking Null nicely to take his shit down will actually work for once.
If this isn't a psyop by Nick, I bet he's fucking crushed lmaoNick has peddled to many of his balldowashers and the Dabbleverse that April has a boyfriend (not Nick)
This reads like something one of us would write with the Skelly Tomlinson meme.Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."
STMS has 13.2k subscribersJuju is on Melton's show. Nick is in chat, proudly proclaiming he's beating the Toe in views.
Wyświetl załącznik 7278187Wyświetl załącznik 7278199
Wyświetl załącznik 7278291
Also how much environmental exposure should occur before it becomes gross negligence?The test results showed levels you would expect from a regular user. Either they gave her coke or she was somehow ingesting it on a frequent basis. A one-off accident doesn't explain it away.
I honestly feel that it is silly to even let Rekieta try and gaslight his way through the evil that he does. It's better to use common sense and most likely explanations until they are proven wrong. And with Rekieta none of the reasonable conclusions were wrong. Some of the wild speculation was wrong but not the basic and reasonable things.Also how much environmental exposure should occur before it becomes gross negligence?
I strongly doubt that the kids didn’t know.
Kids lie though, and with parents like the Rekieta’s, kids learn to lie often and well.
CPS is making a legal document for the court though, so they can’t really write “But I’m pretty sure he’s lying because his dad told him to”, so we will get half the story. “I asked C about drug use, he denied knowing about any drug use”.
I'm confused.
Which forum rule did MNPublicRecords violate?
Why is this faggot skelly trying to pick up MY BROOM?
So it was fine when this faggot had people acquire largely confidential records through local console printouts during the Amber Heard/Depp/Ron whatever cases, but it wasn't okay when someone did the same to him? Am I getting this right? Nicky, you're not special. You're a child doser, you're worse than all of them combined. Oh, I guess that means you are special in a way.
Not only that, his report also generated plenty of absolute Kino Kontent for us on the Farms.Big shoutout to Pastor Melin btw. Dude is a hero and saved those kids from a hellish existence. He saved their lives, and might have even saved Nick's life too. That's a good pastor.

And normally they do not really go hard on kids with questions, unless the situation is much much worse.I would think that they could write something like, 'Child's denies observation or direct knowledge of drug use, but their testimony shows signs of the external influence of a third party'.
I agree that 'not wanting to get mummy or daddy in trouble' could be a motivator as well as the usual tendency that children have to internalise blame and think that *they* were the reason this thing they cannot control is happening--something they should NEVER be blamed for.
Funny I thought it was cause he made phone calls in his shower..naked..trying to get his broken dick hard so he can jerk off while on the phone."shower calls."