State of Texas v. Riley Dalton Mix (a.k.a. Youngclippa)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For the final arrest if the owner of that property did not have him trespassed he cannot be charged with violating that.

I don't know if this helps clarify what you two are discussing, but Eric July is NOT the owner of that property. I thought that was made clear by Rippa himself and the infamous Rekeita stream. What I'm saying is if only the owner can tell you to buzz off maybe all Rippa could get away with was harassment.
 
That is my error then, and I need to update it for clarity. Apologies for the confusion.

I swear I CTRL-F'd the word 'tresspass'and changed it a week ago. Alas...
"trespass" with one S, according to my always running Grammarly plugin that fixes my German English
 
The State's MTD cites the quashing as the reason. I do not think it fair to impute any malice. In theory, however I agree.

Based on the available options, however, and the record, it seems the State does not have the desire or motivation to emend the charges. A lazy prosecutor has more factual basis.

The judge saw one of Riley's videos where he is pissing on Mint Salad and noticed his micro-penis is even smaller than Ethan Ralph's, so he engaged in some Noblesse Oblige
 
"trespass" with one S, according to my always running Grammarly plugin that fixes my German English

Will fix shortly.


I need to update with the dismissal granted today. I will grab the last set of documents later this week, but Riley won.

1000003012.jpg
 
Are you talking trespass from the Rippaverse office or trespass from the meetup? I don't know why Riley wasn't charged with trespassing at the office but that did lead to the warrant for harassment no one knew about.
I think he was warned away from the office, then came back, but possibly he left before he could get arrested. So there was a preexisting warrant he was picked up on. I'm not sure why they chose just a single count of harassment when trespassing is a lot easier to prove.

Possibly it's just the trespassing was in another county so not under the jurisdiction of where he actually was prosecuted. In any event, they didn't charge it.
What I'm saying is if only the owner can tell you to buzz off maybe all Rippa could get away with was harassment.
I believe it was actually the cops who told him off, which they can generally also do. I'm not sure of the involvement of anyone else, like the owner or someone employed on the premises acting on the owner's behalf, but cops can generally warn you off if you're obviously just lurking around up to no good.

It's too bad they blew this like this. It should have been trivial to get at least a fine out of this.
 
I think he was warned away from the office, then came back, but possibly he left before he could get arrested. So there was a preexisting warrant he was picked up on. I'm not sure why they chose just a single count of harassment when trespassing is a lot easier to prove.

Possibly it's just the trespassing was in another county so not under the jurisdiction of where he actually was prosecuted. In any event, they didn't charge it.

I believe it was actually the cops who told him off, which they can generally also do. I'm not sure of the involvement of anyone else, like the owner or someone employed on the premises acting on the owner's behalf, but cops can generally warn you off if you're obviously just lurking around up to no good.

It's too bad they blew this like this. It should have been trivial to get at least a fine out of this.

Yeah, I don't know either and I don't remember when the warrant was issued, only that the public (and Riley) didn't know about it until the arrest.

Another employee got served today but I guess it doesn't matter anymore. Despite @MisterCH 86's insistence that Kino Casino knew what they were talking about I guess we're done here pending further information.

The one thing that Rippa suckup got right was this: Riley won't learn his lesson. Perhaps the next person he crosses won't pretend to be a tough guy and actually air him out.
 
It seems everyone has lost interest in this case (couldn't imagine why) but I thought I'd try my hand at a postmortem as Dick Masterson had Riley's lawyers on a recent episode of his show starting at the 1:01:00 mark and going for roughly 40 minutes (with some Libertarian discussion and Dick's crassness weaved in between). Some highlights that hopefully fill in some of the blanks (I apologize if I screwed up the legal jargon). There are two really big points that I will highlight:

-Apparently Riley-who gave these attorney's permission to speak-was charged under some older version of a harassment law the defense felt didn't apply. The prosecution claimed he violated the harrassment statute by making threats of bodily injury to Eric July and a "mishmash" of two sections consisting of repeated online communications. The defense claims they should have focused on Internet/social media posts as opposed to an older statute regarding texts and e-mails.

-After the Bunny Money incident Rippa called the police (apparently there is a 911 call available to confirm this) to report trespass. Rippa met police at a gas station and they escorted him to the Rippaverse warehouse for a statement. The detective (Farias or whatever) calls Rippa back (also recorded) and seems to be unimpressed. Rippa explains that he did not take Riley's shoulder shaving threat seriously but has to consider the welfare of his employees. Rippa cannot name other specific threats Riley has made.

-A quick recap of Rekieta vs. Rippa, where it's mentioned that Riley went to the warehouse at night when no one was there/interacted with no one and that Rippa's "private bidness" was in the middle of a public space.

-Rippaverse Chief of Security Brandon stays in touch with the detective and basically sends him Riley's daily Twitter feed.

-A warrant is issued for stalking and later downgraded to harassment. As previously mentioned earlier in the thread (and backed up by the arrest footage) Riley is unaware of this warrant when he goes to the G&G meetup.

-On the day of the meetup the owners make it clear to all parties that, while Riley is not welcome in the venue he cannot be removed from the parking lot. Again, this is backed up by footage previously provided in the thread.

-Despite numerous claims by Eric July, Rippaverse employees and known associates of The Fandom Menace (Nerdrotic, Geeks & Gamers, Side Scrollers, etc.) that they were too busy to call the police Rippa's "rockstar" security team either told the police or told the bar owner to tell the police that there was a warrant out for Riley's arrest and that was the only reason he was removed from the meetup that night.

-This case came to the lawyers attention via the Libertarian Party, who claim Eric July is not a real Libertarian.

-Once on board the defense wrote a motion to quash, which was granted. They claim the judge only got through a portion of the motion before signing off.

-The state could have refiled or amended. In the defense's opinion the filings from the prosecution were "atrocious".

-Once the ruling to quash was made there was no case moving forward but the state continued to prepare for trial despite no charging document. The defense surmised that the state kept things going on the assumption that Riley would eventually take a plea deal.

-The prosecutor that wrote the response to the motion to quash was reassigned and no longer works at that office. The new DA's assigned to the case were rookies and it was surmised by the defense that this was their first trial.

-The defense was looking forward to a trial and were counting on a jury in a conservative district to laugh off a "mean Tweet" debate. They insist that Eric July-being the victim of a crime-would have to testify under the Texas Constitution and the Sixth Amendment. As proof that only stupid people believed Rippa didn't have to testify Vikkiverse is specifically mentioned.

-The lawyers say the only reason the trial date remained on the schedule for so long was because the judge forgot to take the date off the calendar. Despite this (and a motion to dismiss) the prosecution continued to file paperwork in preparation for a trial.

-For some odd reason the original video where Rippa told people to "pull up" is no longer available and had to be provided by someone on Twitter who archived it.

-Also previously mentioned in the thread, the state subpoenaed Rippa and some of his employees. Per the prosecution Eric July did not return the state's phone calls and could not be found at his warehouse (the address on the supoena) when an officer attempted to serve him. This is odd because Rippa insists that he is always working and too busy to do other things.

-Assuming that a "private bidness" is a real thing the Rippaverse warehouse is no longer private because the address is plastered all over these court documents.

-The defense claims Riley was prepared to go to jail but felt a guilty verdict was unlikely let alone jail time.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
-The prosecutor that wrote the response to the motion to quash was reassigned and no longer works at that office. The new DA's assigned to the case were rookies and it was surmised by the defense that this was their first trial.
LOL
Yeah, so people basically called it correctly. Glaring incompetence and a case that should have never gone this far, because a competent DA would have realized there was nothing to prosecute here.
 
LOL
Yeah, so people basically called it correctly. Glaring incompetence and a case that should have never gone this far, because a competent DA would have realized there was nothing to prosecute here.

I'm glad you feel vindicated by your prediction but you're not the only one who got something right:

If he ducked a subpoena, he's a bitch.

He can pursue whatever charges he wants but to be unavailable at the last minute is ridiculous.

Competency's irrelevant when the victim (in a legal sense) won't even take your calls. Unless Rippa knew the case was headed for dismissal (I don't know why he would) there's no excuse to be ducking a supoena, especially when his employees are being served the same time he is.

EDIT: Sorry GS, you specifically did not make that prediction. Should've read more carefully.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I'm glad you feel vindicated by your prediction but you're not the only one who got something right:
I was not the first who suggested that, I won't take credit for it.
I did agree with the prediction though, because it made the most sense after reading through the actual motions.

A case being dismissed because "Your honor, the prosecution forgot to write what the actual behavior is they are charging my client for" (paraphrased) should never happen.
 
-After the Bunny Money incident Rippa called the police (apparently there is a 911 call available to confirm this) to report trespass. Rippa met police at a gas station and they escorted him to the Rippaverse warehouse for a statement. The detective (Farias or whatever) calls Rippa back (also recorded) and seems to be unimpressed. Rippa explains that he did not take Riley's shoulder shaving threat seriously but has to consider the welfare of his employees. Rippa cannot name other specific threats Riley has made.
-Also previously mentioned in the thread, the state subpoenaed Rippa and some of his employees. Per the prosecution Eric July did not return the state's phone calls and could not be found at his warehouse (the address on the supoena) when an officer attempted to serve him. This is odd because Rippa insists that he is always working and too busy to do other things.
Dick is correct. Eric pussed out.
 
Dick is correct. Eric pussed out.
I've come around to that, too. He should have told them up front he wasn't going to give testimony favorable to the case. That would have been the real man option. Not waiting until the prosecution was well underway.

I still mainly blame the prosecution for a horribly drafted filing.

That could have been fixed, but given that and the unwillingness of the "victim" to testify, I can't really blame the prosecution for dropping the case at that point, even if I can blame them for a really shitty filing.
 
I've come around to that, too. He should have told them up front he wasn't going to give testimony favorable to the case. That would have been the real man option. Not waiting until the prosecution was well underway.

I still mainly blame the prosecution for a horribly drafted filing.

That could have been fixed, but given that and the unwillingness of the "victim" to testify, I can't really blame the prosecution for dropping the case at that point, even if I can blame them for a really shitty filing.

A motion to quash was granted, it happens. The previous DA messed up, now it's on you, the new DA's, to refile. Why bother? As @Potentially Criminal previously pointed out in this case, as with Cyraxx a couple of years ago, this is dumb Internet shit and it makes all the Normies involved roll their eyes.

Even if the DA's did refile, that doesn't mean they were going to win. Listen to that interview with Riley's lawyers. They were dying to try this case, probably the easiest win of their career. Then take the prosecutor's stance. Assuming they are as fresh faced as the defense claimed they might not have wanted to start their career with an L or, and this is a big "if", they might have even sympathized with the accused. One look at Riley and you can see the only thing he's a threat to is a dozen donuts. One listen of Eric July and you'll be face palming like a drunk Minnesota coke fiend. This was not the slam dunk case everyone here thought it was, which leads me to the other part of your comment.

Eric July probably had every intention of testifying. Why? Because he's a fucking moron who thinks he's a fucking genius. Dude probably thought he could outsmart Riley's lawyers just like he "outsmarted" Nick and all these trolling superchatters that follow him around. That was never going to happen. As mentioned in the interview the defense was made aware of Eric's bullshit not from Rekieta, not from EVS, but from the Libertarian Party of Texas, meaning his reputation extends beyond Internet spergs.

Even if they weren't involved, there's a mountain of evidence that shows years of Rippa being antagonistic towards detractors. Would that have been admitted? If so that would've been bad for Rippa. What definitely would've been admitted was a suggestion to Riley that he "pull up", which was conveniently left out of the backgroud summary by the OP. Everyone with a functioning brain knows there is zero defense for those comments in a court of law, especially when you're a marble mouth moron who has a history of saying stupid shit then following it up the next day with "well what it is is that's not what I said and people are intentionally misundershtanding that to get content out of it."

Bottom line, his "rockstar" lawyers and the people he can't bully into compliance (Griggs, Nerdrotic, etc.) probably told him he can either dodge the supoena and be protected by them and Rippatards like Sturgis and @MisterCH 86 as best as possible or testify in open court and be humiliated (or worse). As PC previously pointed out, he took the "bitch made faggot"route.

This all would've been obvious to the denizens of the Farms if they weren't napalming the messengers and protecting him because they hate said messengers more.
 
Y
Dick is correct. Eric pussed out.
Yep, looks about right to me.

"Bottom line, his "rockstar" lawyers and the people he can't bully into compliance (Griggs, Nerdrotic, etc.) probably told him he can either dodge the supoena and be protected by them and Rippatards like Sturgis and @MisterCH 86 as best as possible or testify in open court and be humiliated (or worse). As PC previously pointed out, he took the "bitch made faggot"route." By the way @Cryborg 1987 only retards say Rippatards at this point. Honestly just glad it's done and over with, and I'm already over it.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
All those retards who promoted EJ over the years must be feeling really fucking dumb getting dragged into this bullshit.
The thing any content creator can do is stay away from toxic morons when they start melting down or actively and intentionally feuding with each other.

Nerdrotic promoting those comic book faggots and talking about how great the world of comic books was "back in the days" will never stop going on my nerves. Especially when they invite these faggots with comic/manga collections as their background for streaming with little anime girl dolls and Sailor Moon memorabilia.
Fucking creepy asswipes the lot of them.


I am saddened we do not get to see discovery and them tard-wrestling in court.
 
I am saddened we do not get to see discovery
For some reason people think discovery is really necessary when so much of this was done in public it's not fucking necessary to see any private info. Would be a waste of time. Nobody at the state level gives a shit about who was conspiring to contribute to an annoyance trespassing. They would save giving a fuck for serious charges.
 
I am saddened we do not get to see discovery and them tard-wrestling in court.
My objection is not to EJ not testifying but the timing. Now, this might not have even been his fault. Possibly, the apparently inept prosecution did not even contact him until recently, but imagine how it would go on cross.

Seriously, the defense would be asking him "are you really afraid of this punk-ass midget?" Do you think he'd say he's in fear of his life? The most he could say is it's an imposition on his employees to have to deal with this moron. Then he all but overtly challenged him to a fight some time before this.

It doesn't make what Riley did legal, per se, but it is going to get eye rolling from a jury.

I think the prosecution should have (in addition to drafting their goddamn complaint better) focused on the public nuisance aspect. Just made it some disorderly conduct type offense with no jail, but a clear message of stop doing this dumb shit.
 
By the way @Cryborg 1987 only retards say Rippatards at this point. Honestly just glad it's done and over with, and I'm already over it.
"Only retards say Rippatard". Boy, you're a clever one. Did you learn that one from the RenownedZ3R0 School of Repetitive and Unoriginal Insults? What jabs would you prefer? Moron? Dumbass? Intellectually challenged? Eric's gaggle of intellectually disabled dipshits?

You have no justification to call anyone "retarded" after the nonsense you spewed in this thread, starting with this absolute gayness:
You sound like you WANT Riley to win. Regardless of how you look at it there's way too much evidence of Riley harassing this man to the point of obsession. Also Eric didn't lie about anything, if anything people lie about him. They misquote him, they misinterpret him, they put words in his mouth and sometimes they even lie about him saying he does something when he doesn't. I've been following this drama since it first started. Also it doesn't matter if Riley only went up to the warehouse and put money with bunny stickers on his door, he still shouldn't have been there, and he had no business going there especially going all the way from California just to harass the guy which he admitted to the police on body camera footage. Internet stuff is a lot more different than when you do it in real life.... THAT'S the truth.

And capped off with this gem:
I don't know how people feel about Kino Casino here, but I will say this.... They've been very informative as well as entertaining.

How'd that "nothingburger" work out for you shithead? Weren't you humiliated enough a month ago? Why are you even here if you're "over" this?

Since you are here, please clarify which part you are "over"? The part where everything you said was wrong or the part where Eric July-after all his blustering about justfied shootings and protecting his employees-dodged a subpoena like the gigantic pussy his detractors told you he was? In your own words you've been following it from the beginning, so please tell everyone why Eric July, who apparently doesn't lie, would duck a subpoena that would-in theory-help him protect his employees from a man so awful he claimed he had every right to shoot him.

Considering I wrote a whole diatribe and all you focused on was the word Rippatard, I'll take a "no comment" in advance. Hopefully this has been an "enlightening" experience for you.

All those retards who promoted EJ over the years must be feeling really fucking dumb getting dragged into this bullshit.
The thing any content creator can do is stay away from toxic morons when they start melting down or actively and intentionally feuding with each other.
You talking about the Fandom Menace crew? Maybe privately but nothing will happen because, as you can see from above, their audience doesn't give a shit.

That being said I don't think it was a coincidence that, around the same time the Motion to Dismiss was filed, the Rippaverse hired a new spokesperson in Gothix.
 
It seems everyone has lost interest in this case (couldn't imagine why) but I thought I'd try my hand at a postmortem as Dick Masterson had Riley's lawyers on a recent episode of his show starting at the 1:01:00 mark and going for roughly 40 minutes (with some Libertarian discussion and Dick's crassness weaved in between).
Video of the appearance of Riley's lawyers (Pantheon Legal) on The Dick Show, "Episode 446 – Dick on Eating Paste":
Archive (360p) (PreserveTube):
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole