- Dołączono
- 3 Gru 2018
You're good! Thanks for the updates
I'll definitely be keeping a close eye on this thread's progress.Kent Hovind v. The United States of America (2020)
- Twórca wątku kant havand
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Status
I'll definitely be keeping a close eye on this thread's progress.
- Dołączono
- 12 Cze 2020
Common misconception -- Ken Hamm debated Bill Nye and a Hovind supporter made a "Fan Edit" of what it would have looked like if Kent debated Nye. Bill Nye has no clue who Kent Hovind is, neither does Richard Dawkins, both of whom Kent has claimed he has reached out to directly to debate, though he claims both turned him down due to being "scared."
- Dołączono
- 3 Gru 2018
Damnit, I wanted to see that slapfight lol
- Dołączono
- 12 Cze 2020
loooooots of updates added. ill check back and see if there's anything else to put in op. thank you for the advice.
- Dołączono
- 23 Lip 2019
I've been listening to this faggot on shortwave radio for years. He's also to blame for Christians thinking hyperbaric oxygen chambers will cure autism, since apparently the pre Flood atmosphere was like a hyperbaric oxygen chamber. Or something. Hovind theory proves it I guess. It's also why dinosaurs were so big.
- Dołączono
- 12 Cze 2020
I'm always surprised to come across people who watched Kent videos in school. We literally watched them in science class in lieu of reading secular textbooks.
We weren't close enough to him for him to write us while in prison, but, I have been to his old house when he lived in Pensacola and met him and his kids. I called him the other day to give him some shit about this embarrassing lawsuit. He still answers every call he gets, just like before prison!
- Dołączono
- 23 Lip 2019
Oh, to add to the tardery, my best friend used to watch his videos in her Christian school as a kid.
There are reasons why she's an atheist.
There are reasons why she's an atheist.
- Dołączono
- 7 Sie 2019
Lame! Thankfully I got the Book of Virtues, and those Chronicles of Narnia tapes in Sunday school. That and your standard bible study.
Miss me with that other boring gay shit. "Science is fake, the earth is flat, and younger then the pyramids".
We conquered the Earth for christ, and gazed upon its roundness from her moon.
West is Best! The aliens are fucked! Deus Vult!
- Dołączono
- 24 Lut 2019
He updated all thsoe videos when he got out of jail, but they aren't labeled as such so can't easily find them.
Leonard Helplessness
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 28 Lis 2018
A very minor quibble with the OP: It's lyme disease. Liking this thread so far!
e: Another quibble I have is with your hyperlink to the IRS page on structuring. That article is an Internal Revenue Manual section and is pretty much unreadable to anybody who does not work for the IRS and possibly to a lot of people who do; from the looks of things it's a guide for IRS agents on how to ferret out structuring schemes first and foremost, rather than a discussion of what structuring actually is.
A link to the actual law against structuring is here. It's still a bit annoying and links to other sections, which turns into a rabbithole of law research; not sure if a better source is available that clearly defines structuring in an understandable way.
e: Another quibble I have is with your hyperlink to the IRS page on structuring. That article is an Internal Revenue Manual section and is pretty much unreadable to anybody who does not work for the IRS and possibly to a lot of people who do; from the looks of things it's a guide for IRS agents on how to ferret out structuring schemes first and foremost, rather than a discussion of what structuring actually is.
A link to the actual law against structuring is here. It's still a bit annoying and links to other sections, which turns into a rabbithole of law research; not sure if a better source is available that clearly defines structuring in an understandable way.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 21 Kwi 2013
Sorry, my bad. Their initials both start with K and H and both are creationists. Though Ken Hamm is a neanderthal looking mother fucker.
- Dołączono
- 12 Cze 2020
It is now fixed in the OP!
Fixed as well. Thanks, mate.
Holy shit, Kent is Gator. Le epic oldfag rulecucked flagger.Kent was the OG flaggot.Never forget.
Autopsy
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 19 Wrz 2017
The OP is underselling it: a thesis like this typically leads to full remediation and an extra year of coursework.
I'm not overly familiar with education degrees, but thesis statements of theology are expected to be the author's seminal work (the field is not practiced exclusively through published papers, in this sense it has more in common with polisci,) and the average award is 300 or so pages of tight, academic prose, usually relating to critical analysis of either church history or liturgical doctrine.
This guy's "thesis", eh, not so much. He begins by summarizing basic history and theogony as part of his introduction, this is usually page stuffer material, and he continues to do so for forty four pages. That's not actually very long by thesis standards, but keep in mind in this case that's nearly half of the entire paper- and at no point in any of this unironic summary of highschool material does he bother to establish a need for his research, or any sort of evidence that his argument is pressing or necessary, indeed, he doesn't even state his argument. Come page forty-five, he's finally ready to start:
At least when he was pretending to be academic it read like a publication of some kind and not an article off the Onion, but the second he's free to editorialize the flood gates slam open and stay open. I'm keeping as far away from his actual "argument" as I can, this is just a select sample of the glaring nonsense and egocentric writing displayed. It's hardly the only issue with this paper, of course, the least funny and most damning one is probably the fact that it is entirely uncited. All of the quotes, blocks of text copypasted from wikipedia or journals, and paraphrased plagiarism from better papers, not a single citation.
I look forward to the case and I hope by some miracle he decides to dust his lawyer and represent himself instead. The statement and proceedings would be absolutely hilarious.
I'm not overly familiar with education degrees, but thesis statements of theology are expected to be the author's seminal work (the field is not practiced exclusively through published papers, in this sense it has more in common with polisci,) and the average award is 300 or so pages of tight, academic prose, usually relating to critical analysis of either church history or liturgical doctrine.
This guy's "thesis", eh, not so much. He begins by summarizing basic history and theogony as part of his introduction, this is usually page stuffer material, and he continues to do so for forty four pages. That's not actually very long by thesis standards, but keep in mind in this case that's nearly half of the entire paper- and at no point in any of this unironic summary of highschool material does he bother to establish a need for his research, or any sort of evidence that his argument is pressing or necessary, indeed, he doesn't even state his argument. Come page forty-five, he's finally ready to start:
Good fucking God.
At least when he was pretending to be academic it read like a publication of some kind and not an article off the Onion, but the second he's free to editorialize the flood gates slam open and stay open. I'm keeping as far away from his actual "argument" as I can, this is just a select sample of the glaring nonsense and egocentric writing displayed. It's hardly the only issue with this paper, of course, the least funny and most damning one is probably the fact that it is entirely uncited. All of the quotes, blocks of text copypasted from wikipedia or journals, and paraphrased plagiarism from better papers, not a single citation.
I look forward to the case and I hope by some miracle he decides to dust his lawyer and represent himself instead. The statement and proceedings would be absolutely hilarious.
- Dołączono
- 23 Lip 2019
I want to say he's been representing himself this whole time.
My grandfather was a lawyer. He was fond of the saying "The man who represents himself has a fool for a client."
Hovind is also the type of person that he would slowly wind up over the course of a night at a bar to get to know all of his crazy.
- Dołączono
- 10 Paź 2017
- Dołączono
- 14 Sie 2017
The crazy Kent documenter has closeup photos of the Monroe Journal article on his website. Here they are.
- Dołączono
- 12 Cze 2020
Kent claims that the family is totally fine with this. Watch this disgusting clip of Hovind admitting he texted the boy's father to try and appease him (probably trying to convince him not to sue), saying "kids do dumb things", and then claiming that the family (which has five kids. The boy that drowned was a twin to another boy) wants to come back:
- Dołączono
- 2 Sty 2017
Frankly, I'm amazed he didn't claim the boy was demonically-possessed and that the blessed lake exorcised him, sending his soul to heaven.
The man's a total lunatic.
- Status