💬 Off-Topic Ex-AF Political Discussion

[Land of Noz]

Well I mean it depends on what left wing ideas we are talking about. I mean taking care of the poor tends to be a left wing value and I don't think that Christianity has lost its luster in that regard.

That's only really applicable to Protestants. You rarely if ever see churches in Spain or Italy back inane left wing nonsense because as Catholics they actually have a fixed theological and moral system. You can't change Catholic doctrine, but any dumb fuck can say "God told me you guys are wrong" and that's how Protestantism functioned and why it tends to divide itself so much. Protestantism never was "based" and Catholicism still is "based". Based on what you might ask? Well, the truth of course.

I completely agree with you. But here's the thing. We're screwed either way. Like if we go full AF and prevent decent people from coming here all we will be left with is degenerates. And if these good people, and their children, are going to be poisoned by consumerism and liberalism anyway then we're just as screwed. It's quite simply our only chance.

Once again I fundamentally agree with you but I think it can be done. I mean speaking from a practical standpoint, what other options do we have at this point? I think that everyone in this thread should think about this. Time is running out and if we don't pull something out of our asses soon the West is fucked.

I actually disagree here. The only reason why smug atheists exist is because relatively speaking times are good. You don't need meaning when you can choke on your wealth. As soon as that changes, we will probably see some kind of a return to religiosity. Let's just hope that Christendom re-emerges rather than some new age bullshit.

What other options do we have? In theory it is really simple. Building the wall was a good idea, and it cost far less than what we just sent to Ukraine. The other main option is an immigration moratorium, which would actually make sense given the coming recession and economic downturn. We've done it before. After 1920 there were severe restrictions placed on immigration to the US. Things didn't open up again until the Hart-Cellar act of 65 which really opened the floodgates for non-european immigration. Even the 1920 law was very restrictive, it basically limited immigration to Anglos and Nordics, and not many of them were coming to the US by that point anyway. That's why most Italians you meet in the US have family that came here in the late 1800s or early 1900s.

I think the same thing needs to happen again, although I'd be okay with restricting immigration based on IQ or college degree or applicable skills. We've had like 100 million non-european immigrants come to the US in the past 60 years and our social fabric is feeling the weight of it. We need time as a country for these groups to coalesce and for American society to become unified again, even if that means current demographic trends continue. We likely won't be able to stop miscegenation and the fact that the poor outbreed the well to do, but that can be managed with proper rule of law and educational system. The one thing we could have control over is immigration, both legal and illegal. That should still be the main focus of people on the right. I mean just this year we have something like 250k-300k illegal immigrants coming across the border each month. That's basically enough people to be the equivalent of a new Chicago every single year. That's not sustainable

 

[Mayor Adam West]

What other options do we have? In theory it is really simple. Building the wall was a good idea, and it cost far less than what we just sent to Ukraine. The other main option is an immigration moratorium, which would actually make sense given the coming recession and economic downturn. We've done it before. After 1920 there were severe restrictions placed on immigration to the US. Things didn't open up again until the Hart-Cellar act of 65 which really opened the floodgates for non-european immigration. Even the 1920 law was very restrictive, it basically limited immigration to Anglos and Nordics, and not many of them were coming to the US by that point anyway. That's why most Italians you meet in the US have family that came here in the late 1800s or early 1900s.

I think the same thing needs to happen again, although I'd be okay with restricting immigration based on IQ or college degree or applicable skills. We've had like 100 million non-european immigrants come to the US in the past 60 years and our social fabric is feeling the weight of it. We need time as a country for these groups to coalesce and for American society to become unified again, even if that means current demographic trends continue. We likely won't be able to stop miscegenation and the fact that the poor outbreed the well to do, but that can be managed with proper rule of law and educational system. The one thing we could have control over is immigration, both legal and illegal. That should still be the main focus of people on the right. I mean just this year we have something like 250k-300k illegal immigrants coming across the border each month. That's basically enough people to be the equivalent of a new Chicago every single year. That's not sustainable

I agree it's not sustainable. However I would disagree with you on several key points. First off, do you really want to restrict immigration off college degrees and IQ? Seriously, we only let in those who are college educated? More people who have been brainwashed by the liberal lies. Now I get where you're coming from, you don't want people who will be a drain on the system, but why feed into a sick and decrepit system by providing it with more supporters?

What we really need is to restrict immigration on values. Only strong Christians should be let in the country. Be that Pablo from Mexico or Sheamus from Ireland. We need men and women of great moral strength, not intelligence. We have enough accountants and engineers as is. Besides, most of the jobs that immigrants take are jobs that citizens view as being beneath them.

The wall was an over simplistic solution to a complex problem, and you know it. Not everyone who enters the country illegally does it by walking from Mexico. Some overstay visas. Hell, iirc there are even tunnels between Mexico and the US. So just building the wall would do little unless other systems were put in place.

As for our social fabric, I think that while immigrants play a role in the current chaos said role is insignificant. Our social fabric is being torn apart by secularism and degeneracy upending traditional institutions, not Pablo working hard and going to church on Sunday. If you want to repair the damage done to our social fabric, you need to tackle the spread of godlessness and degeneracy present most acutely in white America. Specifically, white liberal America. Focusing on race plays into the hand of the godless capitalists. What good is a nation where the native citizenry reigns with degeneracy as its co-ruler? What made America great was not its white values, that's what is killing America. What made America great was its Christian values. The focus on any right wing movement shouldn't be race, but rather religion. That's like the only thing that could possibly unite the nation at this point.

 

[Michael Pemulis]

I agree it's not sustainable. However I would disagree with you on several key points. First off, do you really want to restrict immigration off college degrees and IQ? Seriously, we only let in those who are college educated? More people who have been brainwashed by the liberal lies. Now I get where you're coming from, you don't want people who will be a drain on the system, but why feed into a sick and decrepit system by providing it with more supporters?

What we really need is to restrict immigration on values. Only strong Christians should be let in the country. Be that Pablo from Mexico or Sheamus from Ireland. We need men and women of great moral strength, not intelligence. We have enough accountants and engineers as is. Besides, most of the jobs that immigrants take are jobs that citizens view as being beneath them.

The wall was an over simplistic solution to a complex problem, and you know it. Not everyone who enters the country illegally does it by walking from Mexico. Some overstay visas. Hell, iirc there are even tunnels between Mexico and the US. So just building the wall would do little unless other systems were put in place.

As for our social fabric, I think that while immigrants play a role in the current chaos said role is insignificant. Our social fabric is being torn apart by secularism and degeneracy upending traditional institutions, not Pablo working hard and going to church on Sunday. If you want to repair the damage done to our social fabric, you need to tackle the spread of godlessness and degeneracy present most acutely in white America. Specifically, white liberal America. Focusing on race plays into the hand of the godless capitalists. What good is a nation where the native citizenry reigns with degeneracy as its co-ruler? What made America great was not its white values, that's what is killing America. What made America great was its Christian values. The focus on any right wing movement shouldn't be race, but rather religion. That's like the only thing that could possibly unite the nation at this point.

This is all actual cope. America will never have a serious religious resurgence, it isn't built that way. And if we somehow did have one, it wouldn't be catholic (or "papist", as the people leading it would call you).

And if you really believe this shit, why not move to Mexico? Or any other country with a serious catholic majority. Apparently it's the only thing that matters.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

This is all actual cope. America will never have a serious religious resurgence, it isn't built that way. And if we somehow did have one, it wouldn't be catholic (or "papist", as the people leading it would call you).

Then America is doomed.

And if you really believe this shit, why not move to Mexico? Or any other country with a serious catholic majority. Apparently it's the only thing that matters.

I was thinking more so Poland but hey, could work.

 

[Michael Pemulis]

Then America is doomed.

No, we'll be fine. We'll always have problems (and cringe), but we're actually doing okay. Our best times have come when we put utopianism and zeal aside and address reality for what it is.

I was thinking more so Poland but hey, could work.

You really should cut down on the meme consumption.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

What other options do we have? In theory it is really simple. Building the wall was a good idea, and it cost far less than what we just sent to Ukraine. The other main option is an immigration moratorium, which would actually make sense given the coming recession and economic downturn. We've done it before. After 1920 there were severe restrictions placed on immigration to the US. Things didn't open up again until the Hart-Cellar act of 65 which really opened the floodgates for non-european immigration. Even the 1920 law was very restrictive, it basically limited immigration to Anglos and Nordics, and not many of them were coming to the US by that point anyway. That's why most Italians you meet in the US have family that came here in the late 1800s or early 1900s.

I think the same thing needs to happen again, although I'd be okay with restricting immigration based on IQ or college degree or applicable skills. We've had like 100 million non-european immigrants come to the US in the past 60 years and our social fabric is feeling the weight of it. We need time as a country for these groups to coalesce and for American society to become unified again, even if that means current demographic trends continue. We likely won't be able to stop miscegenation and the fact that the poor outbreed the well to do, but that can be managed with proper rule of law and educational system. The one thing we could have control over is immigration, both legal and illegal. That should still be the main focus of people on the right. I mean just this year we have something like 250k-300k illegal immigrants coming across the border each month. That's basically enough people to be the equivalent of a new Chicago every single year. That's not sustainable

1. Even if we did high IQ immigration, eventually we'd brain drain the entire world. This isn't sustainable. At a certain point you must be able to home grow talent. You can't be a IQ DNA meat grinder forever. This is the most important issue to fix and no it can't do done through education (that's cope). The great society was tried and failed.

2. High IQ immigration is fancy way of saying your children will be forced to compete with Chinese and Indians in business and engineering. This is still a problem. Furthermore do you enjoy living in Chinese or Indian communities? Most whites will still white flight from these areas because they don't feel like home. Why do you feel that you have a moral obligation to have open borders and to replace your people with foreigners? It's total insanity and that must be ended.

3. An immigration moratorium is too little, too late. When you have the ability to prevent these issues, you (and people like you) did nothing because it was easier. Now when faced with becoming a minority, you still take the weaker path. The position today must be to deport ILLEGAL ALIENS AND ANCHOR BABIES AND START REPATRIATING LEGAL NON WHITES. This is the only solution to diversity. Anything else will still cause politics to become a racial headcount and the system to eventually implode. If White Americans aren't willing to come together to save their nation then the US is fucked and we should leave to whiter European nations and try to save them instead.

 

[The ShekelMonster]

Dead on. You can find a lot of people writing all the way back from the 30's and 40's about how academia is being quietly flooded by extremists occupying everyday positions and using their influence to push changes they could never get from the outside. This slowly compounds into takeover of entire institutions without any alarms- think Bracton College from That Hideous Strength.
I see a metric fuckload of people complaining constantly about academia, but rather than jumping down into the trenches and fixing it the same way it broke, they just want to moan and whinge on twitter. Become a pillar of your community and then use your power to enact change

That’s because that’s fucking retarded, to be perfectly blunt. This idea that “muh left infiltrated muh institutions, so we just strap ourselves up by muh bootstraps and muh infiltrate back,” needs to be completely and utterly destroyed. Globo Homo Schlomo isn’t willing to be subverted. There are plenty of academics, like Frances Widdowson just recently in Canada, who have been “cancelled,” for tepidly speaking the truth about things such as the Gravocaust Slander. These institutions are not available to you to subvert, you moron, any more than big corporations are available to be subverted. And even if you could somehow keep your head down the entire time, how would you coordinate the magical day when you all tear off your masks and admit to the world that you’re secretly Le Based Pepe Enjoyers? It’s fucking stupid.

What you actually need to do is form a political party and run for office on destroying these institutions and delegitimize them every step of the way. Sneaks act like sneaks because they’re not popular. Populists shouldn’t act like second rate sneaks, they should actually do what’s popular.

Note, this is not an endorsement of the Manlet Cult in any way, shape, or form.

 

[Michael Pemulis]

That’s because that’s fucking retarded, to be perfectly blunt. This idea that “muh left infiltrated muh institutions, so we just strap ourselves up by muh bootstraps and muh infiltrate back,” needs to be completely and utterly destroyed. Globo Homo Schlomo isn’t willing to be subverted. There are plenty of academics, like Frances Widdowson just recently in Canada, who have been “cancelled,” for tepidly speaking the truth about things such as the Gravocaust Slander. These institutions are not available to you to subvert, you moron, any more than big corporations are available to be subverted. And even if you could somehow keep your head down the entire time, how would you coordinate the magical day when you all tear off your masks and admit to the world that you’re secretly Le Based Pepe Enjoyers? It’s fucking stupid.

What you actually need to do is form a political party and run for office on destroying these institutions and delegitimize them every step of the way. Sneaks act like sneaks because they’re not popular. Populists shouldn’t act like second rate sneaks, they should actually do what’s popular.

Note, this is not an endorsement of the Manlet Cult in any way, shape, or form.

There is another option: Genuinely change your views. Recognize that "globo homo" largely isn't this cartoonish Klaus Schwab shit, it's mostly a sincere worldview held by all sorts of different people. How could it not be? It's the majority view, by far. Nationalism and all these cringey forms of 'rightism' are the exception.

The issue is just that it's gotten out of hand, there is a subdivision of it that treats their tenets as religious orthodoxy rather than general good practice. George Floydism and tranny worship are quite new, and lots of liberals don't like it. America has always been founded on liberalism, which means that the system we had at any point in time was a liberal system and thus it would be permissible under it to promote some older American values.

I suggest that we distinguish the good parts of liberalism from this dystopian bullshit, become moderates and 'normal' conservatives, and help reasonable minds prevail.

 

[Top Skink]

That’s because that’s fucking retarded, to be perfectly blunt. This idea that “muh left infiltrated muh institutions, so we just strap ourselves up by muh bootstraps and muh infiltrate back,” needs to be completely and utterly destroyed. Globo Homo Schlomo isn’t willing to be subverted. There are plenty of academics, like Frances Widdowson just recently in Canada, who have been “cancelled,” for tepidly speaking the truth about things such as the Gravocaust Slander. These institutions are not available to you to subvert, you moron, any more than big corporations are available to be subverted. And even if you could somehow keep your head down the entire time, how would you coordinate the magical day when you all tear off your masks and admit to the world that you’re secretly Le Based Pepe Enjoyers? It’s fucking stupid.

What you actually need to do is form a political party and run for office on destroying these institutions and delegitimize them every step of the way. Sneaks act like sneaks because they’re not popular. Populists shouldn’t act like second rate sneaks, they should actually do what’s popular.

Note, this is not an endorsement of the Manlet Cult in any way, shape, or form.

"DUDE YOU CAN'T SUBVERT THESE INSTITUTIONS, I WENT IN AND TRIED TO TELL EVERYONE ABOUT HOW HITLER WAS COOL AND JEWS ARE EVIL LIZARDS THAT MADE UP THE HOLOCAUST AND THEY TOTALLY KICKED ME OUT WTF"

how retarded do you have to be to think your only options are literal holocaust denial or massively coordinated underground day of the roping?
The jumping into the trenches is exactly a revolt of normal people just acting normally. You're beyond a mongoloid if you think subversive means le sekrit coordinated night of long knives club, it means if you see a problem go try to fix it. The academia example is poignant since AF people are college kids that moan about how bad and pozzed it is constantly, but rather than taking earnest effort to make a positive impact they retreat to discord and jerk off to gay porn.
what's more, if you think the wide spread of modern ideology happened entirely because of super sekrit cabals of lizard jews and not just waves of well-meaning mistaken people pushing an ideology up, you oughta do a little more reading

 

[BoxerShorts47]

There is another option: Genuinely change your views. Recognize that "globo homo" largely isn't this cartoonish Klaus Schwab shit, it's mostly a sincere worldview held by all sorts of different people. How could it not be? It's the majority view, by far. Nativism and all these cringey forms of 'rightism' are the exception.

The issue is just that it's gotten out of hand, there is a subdivision of it that treats their tenets as religious orthodoxy rather than general good practice. George Floydism and tranny worship are quite new, and lots of liberals don't like it. America has always been founded on liberalism, which means that the system we had at any point in time was a liberal system and thus it would be permissible under it to promote some older American values.

I suggest that we distinguish the good parts of liberalism from this dystopian bullshit, become moderates and 'normal' conservatives, and help reasonable minds prevail.

1. If you're talking about original enlightenment era liberalism, then it would be closer to what we call libertarianism (low taxes, no govt welfare and state's right). This original form of liberalism died after the US Civil War and then the 2nd industrial revolution and we replaced with neo-liberalism (higher taxes, govt welfare, and equality/civil rights).

2. Neo-liberalism has metastasized into globalism. There is no difference between worshiping George Flyod and MLK. It's the same ideas repackaged for newer generations.

3. You can't go back in time. "Well the globalism/neo-liberalism of today is dystopian but the 1990s multiculturalism was swell." There are real problems like inequalities between whites and blacks in crime and income or militarized police and these problems must be addressed. There are 2 paths. 1) Status quo: blame white people; which is only path if you accept equality and civil rightd. 2) Race Realism - blacks have lower IQs and less impulse control and, without a police presence, they start killing. Neo-libs gave blacks freedom from slavery and citizenship against the will of most whites and now these problems exist and they can't explain the failures of their policies without conspiracy theories like white privilege or systemic racism. Or other problems like the IQ dropping each generation because the smartest women have fewer kids. Just like Liberalism replaced monarchy, race realism and eugenics will replace neo-liberalism. We're not going back in time and moderates are just people with their heads stuck in the sand.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

3. You can't go back in time. "Well the globalism/neo-liberalism of today is dystopian but the 1990s multiculturalism was swell." There are real problems like inequalities between whites and blacks in crime and income or militarized police and these problems must be addressed. There are 2 paths. 1) Status quo: blame white people; which is only path if you accept equality and civil rightd. 2) Race Realism - blacks have lower IQs and less impulse control and, without a police presence, they start killing. Neo-libs gave blacks freedom from slavery and citizenship against the will of most whites and now these problems exist and they can't explain the failures of their policies without conspiracy theories like white privilege or systemic racism. Or other problems like the IQ dropping each generation because the smartest women have fewer kids. Just like Liberalism replaced monarchy, race realism and eugenics will replace neo-liberalism. We're not going back in time and moderates are just people with their heads stuck in the sand.

Now I can’t speak for everyone here, but for me the appeal of AF when I first heard of them was I thought that they were seeking to build something different. Something separate from wignattery, liberalism, and conservatism. Something based off Christian values and Western ideals. Then Nick showed his true colors as both a racist and faggot.

I think the answer is that we have to embrace Christian values while taking an agnostic attitude towards race realism. Both for moral reasons and political reasons. At the end of the day the only thing that could justify treating blacks as inferiors is if Evola was right about them having an inferior soul, but that runs counter to Christian heterodoxy. Not to mention the fact that it’s political suicide to embrace race realism. We must accept what we have lost, racial and cultural homogeneity, and work earnestly to resuscitate the bedrock of the West: Christendom. A multiracial society is unavoidable and it is workable among brothers in Christ.

 

[Michael Pemulis]

Now I can’t speak for everyone here, but for me the appeal of AF when I first heard of them was I thought that they were seeking to build something different. Something separate from wignattery, liberalism, and conservatism. Something based off Christian values and Western ideals. Then Nick showed his true colors as both a racist and faggot.

I think the answer is that we have to embrace Christian values while taking an agnostic attitude towards race realism. Both for moral reasons and political reasons. At the end of the day the only thing that could justify treating blacks as inferiors is if Evola was right about them having an inferior soul, but that runs counter to Christian heterodoxy. Not to mention the fact that it’s political suicide to embrace race realism. We must accept what we have lost, racial and cultural homogeneity, and work earnestly to resuscitate the bedrock of the West: Christendom. A multiracial society is unavoidable and it is workable among brothers in Christ.

What do you even mean by this? You never seem to say anything about what these christian values actually are, how they are differentiated from other sets of values, how they are implemented, and how they benefit society. I think you just like saying this because it sounds nice, like it exempts you from the moral responsibilities of heavy issues like this. It's almost on the level of saying "Wouldn't it be nice if we all started being nice to each other? That's my solution"

And obviously you know this will never happen, so you don't have to own up to it. It's a distant fantasy that you are free to imagine however you want.

 

[The ShekelMonster]

"DUDE YOU CAN'T SUBVERT THESE INSTITUTIONS, I WENT IN AND TRIED TO TELL EVERYONE ABOUT HOW HITLER WAS COOL AND JEWS ARE EVIL LIZARDS THAT MADE UP THE HOLOCAUST AND THEY TOTALLY KICKED ME OUT WTF"

how retarded do you have to be to think your only options are literal holocaust denial or massively coordinated underground day of the roping?

How retarded do you have to be to think that Frances Widdowson, a literal Marxist centrist getting fired despite having tenure for saying true things about a slander is "LITERAL HOLOCAUST DENIAL"? I guess she should have just tactically hidden her power level, and gone along with 100% of Globo Homo Schlomo instead of just 95%. I literally said that the solution is to form political parties and go after these people, so what's yours, faggot? Other than strawmanning me as showing up with a sign at the UBC Social Justice Institute and screaming about wooden doors. I mean actually explain to the crowd what "muh subverting," plan is, beyond direct political legislation.

As for the other commenter, the reason why the mass murder propagandists who lied us into Iraq are not being censored, but in fact promoted while we are censored is not because "muh well meaning people with mistaken beliefs." The reason why we have more deaths from opiates than from WWI, WW2, Korea, and every war since combined is not because of "muh well meaning people." Larry Fink and Blackrock control $12 Trillion worth in assets. Zionist jews like Harvey Weinstein run Hollywood. Every single congressman supports Israel and jew nationalism, and every single one, including the Republicans, recently condemned White Nationalism. Child trannies, outsourcing, endless wars, and outright thieving aren't things that sprouted out of the ether of good intentions. Politics isn't run by clueless and naively ideological people, and your pretenses of reasonableness as you pretend otherwise are annoying.

 

[Black Light Red Panic]

I was a former ex-groyper. I can attest to the cum detective stories because I myself was one of his elite cum hunters. Simon is partially lying, he too worked the same couches as me. It's curious that Nick doesn't mentioned finding any cumm definitively because I was beating off post- regularly on Jarns couches for the former half of 2021.

 

[Mayor Adam West]

I was a former ex-groyper. I can attest to the cum detective stories because I myself was one of his elite cum hunters.

Thank you for your service sir. o7

What do you even mean by this? You never seem to say anything about what these christian values actually are, how they are differentiated from other sets of values, how they are implemented, and how they benefit society. I think you just like saying this because it sounds nice, like it exempts you from the moral responsibilities of heavy issues like this. It's almost on the level of saying "Wouldn't it be nice if we all started being nice to each other? That's my solution"

Do you really wanna hear that spiel?

And obviously you know this will never happen, so you don't have to own up to it. It's a distant fantasy that you are free to imagine however you want.

Crazier things have happened

 

[Michael Pemulis]

Do you really wanna hear that spiel?

Usually we get it whether or not we want to hear it. Kind of dubious that you're holding back now.

 

[Black Light Red Panic]

I have formally masturbated to the point of ejaculation 1,121 times in the service of Nick Fuentes, however, only 207 of those dedicated loads resulted in ejaculation (as opposed to a failed or ruined orgasm). This got worse and worse in the short time I was FWB with Sasha Foxx. I can still hear the DNB remixes when I close my eyes . . .

 

[Land of Noz]

How retarded do you have to be to think that Frances Widdowson, a literal Marxist centrist getting fired despite having tenure for saying true things about a slander is "LITERAL HOLOCAUST DENIAL"? I guess she should have just tactically hidden her power level, and gone along with 100% of Globo Homo Schlomo instead of just 95%. I literally said that the solution is to form political parties and go after these people, so what's yours, faggot? Other than strawmanning me as showing up with a sign at the UBC Social Justice Institute and screaming about wooden doors. I mean actually explain to the crowd what "muh subverting," plan is, beyond direct political legislation.

As for the other commenter, the reason why the mass murder propagandists who lied us into Iraq are not being censored, but in fact promoted while we are censored is not because "muh well meaning people with mistaken beliefs." The reason why we have more deaths from opiates than from WWI, WW2, Korea, and every war since combined is not because of "muh well meaning people." Larry Fink and Blackrock control $12 Trillion worth in assets. Zionist jews like Harvey Weinstein run Hollywood. Every single congressman supports Israel and jew nationalism, and every single one, including the Republicans, recently condemned White Nationalism. Child trannies, outsourcing, endless wars, and outright thieving aren't things that sprouted out of the ether of good intentions. Politics isn't run by clueless and naively ideological people, and your pretenses of reasonableness as you pretend otherwise are annoying.

My guess when he read your post he thought "Gravocaust denial" meant holocaust denial. I assume you're talking about the allegations of Indian mass graves near Canadian schools or churches. Regardless, how did this professor get fired if she had tenure? I thought that was the whole point of tenure, that you couldn't be fired for having challenging views. I mean, Kevin MacDonald taught for the University of California up until 2014 and only left because he retired (https://daily49er.com/news/2014/04/14/controversial-psychology-professor-to-retire-in-the-fall/). How were they even able to fire that professor?

 

[LeChampion1992]

I support America first in principal. (Like no Foreign forever wars, no mass migration, preserve the mostly Caucasian majority of the united states.)
One of the issues I had with America first is Nick Fuentes and many of the groypers at best were contrarian often just for its sake and at worst took the anti American line without thinking it through.

I mean I'm far right but I will take pragmatic position's on foreign policy. Ie be the madman in the room if it means America is safer. My problem is the groyper movement turned into nick Fuentes and Kami to a lesser degree butt buddy conference.

That being said nick destroying Charlie Kirk and some of his debates have been helpful.

 

[Black Light Red Panic]

One of the corgiest things Nick had us do (there were 7 of us in total, Simon is the only one of us whose identities even inside the movement has been internally revealed. Nick had us enter into deprivation tanks and edge for 17 hours a day during which we'd be drowned in light and Gwen Stefani DNB remixes. This was unlock our latent white girl anima energies to better detect cum. We underwent Sandpaper Therapy to remove our facial features (Simon is wearing a latex mask resembling a human face).

Unfortunately my AF-branded Blacklight was destroyed during my escape from his news tower.

EDIT: It's true.