💬 Off-Topic Ex-AF Political Discussion

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
That means a significant portion of the population is going to have to donate to them. People barely tithe. How will you convince the population to donate? Or would you like them to raise taxes? Do you want the raising of taxes?
Once funding for the DoD has been slashed to $70 billion per year, there will be ample funding for social programs.
 
Once funding for the DoD has been slashed to $70 billion per year, there will be ample funding for social programs.
You do realize that thinking is quite leftist, correct? The United States has a lot of fingers in pies around the world and does a lot of defense for a significant portion of many nations. Who is going to pick up the slack when it comes to those things? Which nation/s would it be?
 
You do realize that thinking is quite leftist, correct? The United States has a lot of fingers in pies around the world and does a lot of defense for a significant portion of many nations. Who is going to pick up the slack when it comes to those things? Which nation/s would it be?
The Defense Department budget must be cut by 90%. The ill-gotten gains must be redistributed to the People. I am talking about left-wing economic populism combined with right-wing social traditionalism. It is a winning formula. It is the coalition that sings to the hearts of the youth.
 
The Defense Department budget must be cut by 90%. The ill-gotten gains must be redistributed to the People. I am talking about left-wing economic populism combined with right-wing social traditionalism. It is a winning formula. It is the coalition that sings to the hearts of the youth.
Again, who is going to pick up the slack if the US isn't doing it?
 

Keith Woods did a little survey of the (warring) factions on the online (far) right. He identifies:
  • America First
  • America, Second (anti Nick Fuentes AF, people disillusioned with Fuentes)
  • Ethnonationalists
  • American 3P (TRS, NJP, Patriot Front)
  • AmRen/Vdare
  • 3P Ideologues
  • Racist Liberals
  • Populists (broad category: Sargon, PJW, anti-CRT movement, post-Left)
  • Post-NRx Christians
  • BAPists
  • Paleoprogressives (Richard Spencer and co.)
  • Pagans
  • Blackpilled Accelerationists
  • Schizos
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5VgqovWGTNk
Keith Woods did a little survey of the (warring) factions on the online (far) right. He identifies:
  • America First
  • America, Second (anti Nick Fuentes AF, people disillusioned with Fuentes)
  • Ethnonationalists
  • American 3P (TRS, NJP, Patriot Front)
  • AmRen/Vdare
  • 3P Ideologues
  • Racist Liberals
  • Populists (broad category: Sargon, PJW, anti-CRT movement, post-Left)
  • Post-NRx Christians
  • BAPists
  • Paleoprogressives (Richard Spencer and co.)
  • Pagans
  • Blackpilled Accelerationists
  • Schizos
There's a lot of padding there, most of those could just be included in the 'Schizos' category. The cult of an e-celeb is typically more akin to a neurosis than a meaningful political category.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5VgqovWGTNk
Keith Woods did a little survey of the (warring) factions on the online (far) right. He identifies:
  • America First
  • America, Second (anti Nick Fuentes AF, people disillusioned with Fuentes)
  • Ethnonationalists
  • American 3P (TRS, NJP, Patriot Front)
  • AmRen/Vdare
  • 3P Ideologues
  • Racist Liberals
  • Populists (broad category: Sargon, PJW, anti-CRT movement, post-Left)
  • Post-NRx Christians
  • BAPists
  • Paleoprogressives (Richard Spencer and co.)
  • Pagans
  • Blackpilled Accelerationists
  • Schizos
I think that this is accurate. Of the groups listed I think that the ones with the most staying power are the Post-NRx, Pagans, and Populists. America, Second is gonna die out due to its association with Fuentes no matter how much they try to distance themselves from him.
 
Keith Woods did a little survey of the (warring) factions on the online (far) right. He identifies:
  • America First 🢂 AN IDEOLOGICALLY- INCOHERENT, MULTIRACIAL (NIGGERS, JEWS, ETC) TEEN BOY HOMO CLUB FULL OF PSEUDO-CHRISTIANS AND FOUL-MOUTHED "GAMERS"
  • America, Second (anti Nick Fuentes AF, people disillusioned with Fuentes) 🢂UNITING TO DESTROY THE RIDICULOUS CLOWN SHOW AND ITS RINGMASTER NICHOLAS J. FUENTES
  • Ethnonationalists 🢂 A FANCY TERM FOR PRO-WHITE ADVOCATES
  • American 3P (TRS, NJP, Patriot Front) 🢂 JUST ANOTHER COLLECTION OF FRINGE GROUPS
  • AmRen/Vdare 🢂 RUN BY ELDERLY MEN WHO NEVER ONCE CAME UP WITH ANY PLAN WHATSOEVER TO RESTORE WHITE AMERICA
  • 3P Ideologues 🢂 JUST SOME "IDEOLOGUES" NOBODY GIVES A FUCK ABOUT
  • Racist Liberals 🢂 KIND OF LIKE THE OPPOSITE OF FAGGOT CONSERVATIVES
  • Populists (broad category: Sargon, PJW, anti-CRT movement, post-Left) 🢂 IN OTHER WORDS, WEIRDOS
  • Post-NRx Christians 🢂 JUST ANOTHER FUCKED-UP OFFSHOOT OF TRADITIONAL CHRISTIANS
  • BAPists 🢂"BRONZE AGE PERVERTS" IS REASON ENOUGH TO BRUSH THEM ASIDE
  • Paleoprogressives (Richard Spencer and co.) 🢂 BORED RICH KID EXCEPT HE'S NOW IN HIS 40'S WHO'S DESPERATE TO STAY RELEVANT
  • Pagans 🢂 WORSHIPPERS OF THE WHITE EQUIVALENT OF JUNGLE VOODOO-GODS
  • Blackpilled Accelerationists 🢂 LIKE THE NEW ZEALAND MUSLIM SHOOTER & THE BUFFALO, NEW YORK SUPERMARKET NIGGER SLAUGHTERIZER
  • Schizos 🢂JUST GLANCE AROUND, YOU'LL SEE ONE

GUNT DANCING - TRANPARENT BACKGROUND - ANIMATED - VERSION 222.gif
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5VgqovWGTNk
Keith Woods did a little survey of the (warring) factions on the online (far) right. He identifies:
  • America First
  • America, Second (anti Nick Fuentes AF, people disillusioned with Fuentes)
  • Ethnonationalists
  • American 3P (TRS, NJP, Patriot Front)
  • AmRen/Vdare
  • 3P Ideologues
  • Racist Liberals
  • Populists (broad category: Sargon, PJW, anti-CRT movement, post-Left)
  • Post-NRx Christians
  • BAPists
  • Paleoprogressives (Richard Spencer and co.)
  • Pagans
  • Blackpilled Accelerationists
  • Schizos
Honestly While I see nick Fuentes tanking a movement and "becoming a Richard Spencer 2.0". I think that a lot more of the sane people that did associate with America first will probably find a way to broker s truce if not a alliance with conservative inc.
There's a lot of padding there, most of those could just be included in the 'Schizos' category. The cult of an e-celeb is typically more akin to a neurosis than a meaningful political category.
I would say most of these guys are grifters before being "schizos". I've met some real schizos online. Most of the right wing schizos are nothing compared to some of the legit right wing schizos on telegram.
 
I saw bits of Keith’s video. He didn’t distinguish between the Nietzchean atheist larper wing-Brahmin and the Apollonians(as well as other Nietzche focused dissident right Twitter accounts) and the European Union will save the White race Spencer toadies. Which I see as a major distinction.

How much of that is “real” vs online factions is always of course up for debate.

I’d say though AF is the largest and least esoteric dissident right faction-for this reason it’s useful as a vehicle into the mainstream of conservative politics.
 
I saw bits of Keith’s video. He didn’t distinguish between the Nietzchean atheist larper wing-Brahmin and the Apollonians(as well as other Nietzche focused dissident right Twitter accounts) and the European Union will save the White race Spencer toadies. Which I see as a major distinction.

How much of that is “real” vs online factions is always of course up for debate.

I’d say though AF is the largest and least esoteric dissident right faction-for this reason it’s useful as a vehicle into the mainstream of conservative politics.

I think a lot of the online distinctions are relatively fake. These online personalities need to be seen as very different from one another so they can keep a core group of fans/paypigs that will send them money via superchats or other means. If there was only one movement and one defined leader, all the money would go to that singular leader instead of being spread among others
 
I think a lot of the online distinctions are relatively fake. These online personalities need to be seen as very different from one another so they can keep a core group of fans/paypigs that will send them money via superchats or other means. If there was only one movement and one defined leader, all the money would go to that singular leader instead of being spread among others
It took you 8 years to figure this out.
 
I think a lot of the online distinctions are relatively fake. These online personalities need to be seen as very different from one another so they can keep a core group of fans/paypigs that will send them money via superchats or other means. If there was only one movement and one defined leader, all the money would go to that singular leader instead of being spread among others
This happens in every community. A good irl example is churches. Many churches have speakers and communities that are different enough to have a supportive group that gives them money
 
I just got finished giving the nastiest sloppy toppy to Nick Fuentes personal Orgasm Denial Therapist. I told him about this site in between deep-fryng his massive throbbing hard nigger cock. Yes, I did. I sucked the cum RIGHT OUT. STUFFED A FAT THUMB RIGHT UP HIS TIGHT LITTLE NIGGER ASSHOLE.

Apparently Nick hasn't actually ejaculated in almost 2 years so his cum hunting may be directly linked to some kind of ennui.
 

Curtis Yarvin critiques Nick Fuentes' antagonistic style of politics, antagonistic dissident politics in general, and also points out Nick stole and perverted the 'Groyper' concept as well as the concept of 'cozy'. This is from 2020.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole