David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms

[WarJams]

lmao, this is the second time today he has shat himself onto another state's docket crying about totally separate cases in Delaware. He always just puts what is chapping his ass at that exact moment right into the filings, usually with the most tortured metaphor you've ever read, just so you know that he is really, totally, definitely not-mad about it.

 

[teriyakiburns]

I'm baffled by the cheeseburger remark. Why not hot dogs?

He already ate them.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

Acerthorn to the 4th circuit

'What they knew I meant' they didn't know because 1) They're not psychic* 2) You're fucking nuts. 90% of the time you don't even know what you meant.

*Imagine being psychic and looking inside his head. There is not enough bleach in the world.

 

[Harvey Danger]

The Defendants are completely missing the point. This is nothing more than an argument for semantics.

Arguments over semantics? In my legal system? It's more likely than you think!

The important thing is (A) I was deprived of a valuable benefit (leave to proceed in forma pauperis)

A privilege, not a benefit, and definitely not a right. Your receipt or deprivation thereof is not unconstitutional.

(B) that I would otherwise have qualified for,

Citation needed. Oh wait, we have a whole report and recommendation on that topic. Tough shit.

(C) in retaliation for me exercising my First Amendment rights.

Saying it a hundred times still doesn't make it true.

It's not worth Hardin chasing down, but I bet there's relevant law somewhere stating that recording a private conversation is not a First Amendment right. Talking to a clerk may be about public business, but since it's not on the record it is not inherently public. Publishing that recording to Youtube gets closer, but the source of it obviously messes up any automatic presumption of 1A protections. ETA: filing a complaint about the clerk is also not a 1A issue.

Not worth fighting a pig in his sty over it, but it would be worth an interesting discussion in a more serious lawsuit.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Saying it a hundred times still doesn't make it true.

It's not worth Hardin chasing down, but I bet there's relevant law somewhere stating that recording a private conversation is not a First Amendment right. Talking to a clerk may be about public business, but since it's not on the record it is not inherently public. Publishing that recording to Youtube gets closer, but the source of it obviously messes up any automatic presumption of 1A protections. ETA: filing a complaint about the clerk is also not a 1A issue.

Not worth fighting a pig in his sty over it, but it would be worth an interesting discussion in a more serious lawsuit.

Every Judge he raised this argument against explained to him that courts have a right to set their own rules, and he is obliged to obey them.

 

[Sneed Force One]

This case is so retarded I've actually forgotten what his claims are.

 

[DavidS877]

This case is so retarded I've actually forgotten what his claims are.

Claims?
Where we're going we don't need claims.
(And where we're going better be upholding the IFP denial and then if Stabby does pay then dismissal for some other good reason.)

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This case is so retarded I've actually forgotten what his claims are.

Some guy stole Acerthorn's video. Acerthorn DMCA'd Null. Null complied and removed the video. Null publically said "hey, you can't steal videos from people. If you post something it has to be transformative per federal law". The person posted a transformative copy. Acer DMCA'd Null again. Null rejected it stating it's fair use. Acer sued Null arguing that his "hey, don't steal post" was contributory infringement (citing Greer v moon 10th circuit) and that Null's comments regarding Acer's previous litigation were defamatory

 

[Adr1anD]

This case is so retarded I've actually forgotten what his claims are.

Waaa, you let your users post my video with commentary, this is not fair use (because I said so), I'll sue ya! You also posted my DMCA even though I told you not to!


Ninja'd.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

The real reason there is a lawsuit vs Jersh is 2 fold

Jersh called Mr Stabby a fat useless retard, who sues everyone he meets. Which as you would guess pissed off the fat tub of greasy lard to no end. And Mr Stabby is dirt poor and sees the legal system as his get rich quick scheme so any excuse to sue is a good excuse.

 

[mindlessobserver]

This case is so retarded I've actually forgotten what his claims are.

He has not made any claims. Its important to remember that this case is still at the stage of whether or not Stabby is allowed to make claims for free. The district court has told him no, and he has appealed to the 4th circuit.

The case posture at this time is Stebbins was denied IFP, and cannot file. Which means no complaint is before the court. Which means the complaint has not even been served yet and null is under no obligation to litigate. This lawsuit does not exist. Until Stebbins pays the southern district of west virginia the filing fee, there is no lawsuit, and null doesn't have to respond to anything.

That is the legal posture of the case right now. There is no case until stebbins pays for it. And since Stebbins refuses to pay for it, this case is quite literally not real and both the court and the defense has no obligation to pretend that it is real. As far as the court is concerned, Stebbins' dispute is simply a hallucination of his own mind, and its on him to try and convince the court otherwise. The court also has no statutory obligation to entertain Stebbins delusion that his case exists, and they have made this abundantly clear to the retard.

There is no case. There is no spoon. Do not try and make sense of Stebbins' filings. That is impossible. There is no spoon. Then you will see that it is not the spoon that bends, but you. By not challenging the case, rather, the existence of the case itself. The 4th circuit will see you now.

 

[DragoonSierra]

Is he literally saying that everyone should have read his mind?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Is he literally saying that everyone should have read his mind?

That would be at best a very short read. Not a novel. More like the world's most disturbing and disturbed picture book. "See Stabby Run"

 

[DragoonSierra]

That would be at best a very short read. Not a novel. More like the world's most disturbing and disturbed picture book. "See Stabby Run"

I imagine it would still be labrynthian due to his Asbergers.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I imagine it would still be labrynthian due to his Asbergers.

More like that Escher stair painting where nothing make sense and everything depends on where your standing at that exact moment.

 

[moocow]

*Imagine being psychic and looking inside his head. There is not enough bleach in the world.

I imagine it would still be labrynthian due to his Asbergers.

More like that Escher stair painting where nothing make sense and everything depends on where your standing at that exact moment.

I'm reminded of the rather interesting idea that the old sci-fi show Babylon 5 had about telepathically engaging with an insane or otherwise broken mind. In-universe, telepaths exist, are carefully trained and regulated, and even allowed to engage in private enterprise using their talents. When a criminal is sentenced to "death by personality" -- telepathically erasing his mind and personality and somehow installing a new one (no, nobody explained how that worked) -- they have to be "scanned" by a licensed telepath first so they can be re-scanned afterward to "compare" the minds to make sure the nutjob is actually gone.

In a retarded extension of our modern fetish for exaggerating the protection of criminals' rights over those of the victim, there was much dialogue expended on how no matter what she found in his mind, it couldn't be used against him (he was convicted of "this" crime, but somehow that wasn't enough to justify getting evidence from him about others ... even in fiction our laws are fucking retarded sometimes). Fucked up notion.

But I liked how they presented the act itself (the criminal is conscious and takes the opportunity to fuck with her mentally as much as possible as she "explores," and she discovers -- naturally -- that the dude had killed hundreds of victims, and of course none of that information could be used to charge him for more crimes, give answers to mourning loved ones, etc., because again, "fuck the victims when the criminal's rights conflict") she tried to explain it to a friend from her perspective (one of the few times he wasn't actively hitting on her):

Michael Garibaldi: Are you okay?
Talia Winters: No, not really. In the past five years, I've scanned minds that were so different that at times I was afraid I wouldn't find my way back out. At least those minds held more humanity than what I saw a few hours ago. The things that live inside us, Mr. Garibaldi. Terrible things. Terrible. You said earlier, that you would bet good money he had killed before. You would not have lost.

I imagine Stubbins' crazy-ass mind would be a twisted knot of rage, hatred, contempt, arrogance and endless confusion. Like the Ashtray Maze from the 2019 game Control, without the awesome music to go with it. And probably a lot more fog.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The decision referenced in this letter can be found here:

N

😵‍💫 Skitzocow Opublikuj w wątku „David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid"

8 Cze 2026

Stebbins' vexatious litigant status in the Northern District of California has been AFFIRMED by the Ninth Circuit. It's over, Stebbins bros...

Stebbins was already subject to the filing restrictions the order imposed, so this does not change his ability to file cases. However, it does finalize the issue and prevent him from claiming the Northern California vexatious litigant designation will likely be overturned on appeal, which he has repeatedly claimed since the original order.

Stebbins already requested rehearing and en banc review (also attached), which obviously will not happen.

• Nick G

Reakcje: x 17 x 6 x 4 x 2 x 3 x 1

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Such a refreshing change when courts get something right.
Now let's hope this court follows suit and sanctions Stabby.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Curiously, Mr. Stebbins did not mention this recent precedent in his own June 6, 2026 Reply Brief before this Court. Appellees hope that was an oversight rather than a lack of candor.

I've never seen a clearer example of false hope.

The Ninth Circuit joins the Eighth Circuit in affirming the imposition of prefiling restrictions against Mr. Stebbins... This Court would do well to follow in their footsteps.

 

[DavidS877]

In the 4th Circuit Mandamus case, which was denied. Mr. Hardin has filed for costs that Stebbins should owe.

Snicker.
(Costs, not attorney's fees, which will likely be a motion at the end of the case.)