Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms
In re: David Stebbins
26-1398— Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Docket No.
26-1398
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
6 Kwi 2026
Terminated
26 Maj 2026
Last Filing
9 Cze 2026
Parties (2)
Parties
In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 20)
#
Date
Description
Filing
20
9 Cze 2026
BILL OF COSTS by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon. Date and method of service: 06/10/2026 ecf. [1001995048] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 06/10/2026 05:04 PM]
JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Petition denied. Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Entered on Docket Date: 05/27/2026. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985492] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:11 AM]
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to dismiss appeal [15]; denying Motion to strike [14]; denying Motion to reconsider [10]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus [2] Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001985489] [26-1398] CH [Entered: 05/27/2026 11:09 AM]
RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion to dismiss appeal [15]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001972939] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:58 AM]
RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM]
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joshua Moon. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001987301] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:52 AM]
RULE 46 NOTICE issued to Matthew Hardin for Joshua Moon for filing of disclosure form. Requested document due 06/15/2026. [1001987249] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/29/2026 10:19 AM]
We all know the Gobbler has anger issues so the more Hardin can trigger those rages the more retarded filings Stabby issues and the more he pushes the limits of the courts patience.
It's 4d legal chess.
Plus I'd imagine being a lawyer is pretty boring, teasing the were-turkey is at least amusing.
He's taking the situation seriously. If Nulls legal shenanigans have proven anything, its that sometimes the court system decides to take the insane ramblings and try to interpret them into something legally precedential. Reiterating Stabby's past legal history is to get on record that the district court decision wasn't the SDWV bullying a poor retard who doesn't understand how to accurately plead his case. Its also to head off the possibility of the 4th circuit entertaining this nonsense if only so they can make a precedential ruling on the issue that can be cited elsewhere. Circuit courts do this from time to time. The decision is already predetermined but they force the parties to shuck and jive anyway so they can put that decision on the record.
*edit* the issue for Hardin is he is relying on persuasive arguments made in other jurisdictons. Like the 11th circuit, 9th circuit and the State of Arkansas. Stebbins is raising "novel" issues in the 4th circuit. Which carries the risk that the 4th circuit may want to swing a bat at those issues. So you can't drop the game face, even if your game face is wearing a clown nose.
Style nitpick: I wish he'd stop cluttering up the zingers and just say "thrice-declared", because it's true. Force the retard to complain, multiple times, that the 3rd doesn't count because it's under appeal; don't become repetitive yourself.
I think the only thing I think I would have liked to see Hardin add is how that other judge in California explicitly ordered him to cease recording and harassing clerks, and he still has failed to get the message.
sidalphas lawyer is trying out a novel legal strategy of giving stabby everything he wants and waiting to see what he does with it, so at this point theyre about to begin discovery. he also doesnt seem to give much of a shit about the case. its pretty sad to watch
sidalphas lawyer is trying out a novel legal strategy of giving stabby everything he wants and waiting to see what he does with it, so at this point theyre about to begin discovery. he also doesnt seem to give much of a shit about the case. its pretty sad to watch
Tldr: The court may not have declared me a vexatious litigant by denying ifp, BUT I SURE FELT THAT WAY! He stole my rights! HE MADE ME INTO A CHEESEBURGER! - Acerthorn to the 4th circuit
If only there was something in 28 USC 1915 (e)(2) that would explain why the district court might deny him IFP.
Citation needed. In theory, maybe the 21 day clock hasn't attached due to the motions being filed not being part of the motions that start the clock, but if you're trying to claim that then you better back it up.
Magistrate Judge Tinsley removed himself for a "conflict" which could be anything. Maybe he's going to take a vacation, maybe he'd rather work on other cases, maybe he made a KiwiFarms account and realized we were right. Looking at his calendar he seems to be doing exclusively criminal cases now. Looking at Court Listener it's almost exclusively criminal and civil rights cases.
