Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

>IMPLYING powiedział(a):

There's generally such a strong sequestering of right-wing perspectives (as opposed to Leftist, internationalist ones) due to language and information access that that this is the first time I'm hearing of this.
Why not kvetch publicly to enlighten people on this?

Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Unironically I don't want to give retards more ammunition to scream and yell about shit. They don't really understand.

JeanRob1 powiedział(a):

I would love to see a Jewish explaining Jewish things Thread here, but I'm sure it would be a shitshow because some niggers wouldn't be able to behave.

Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

That's why you're right on the money. Whenever I have theological questions or I ask the theological debate or something like that. I end up going to the Catholic thread because at least those people know how to have a civil conversation. And Catholics are generally very knowledgeable about their books (while I disagree with them on core elements, in my experience learned Catholics do not come to these conclusions that they have because they read some bullshit on /pol/ or because their Minister who got ordained off the side of a cookie jar decided to preach about his insane theories on jewish banking), And are very upfront about the fuck ups that the church has done.


Also, to have a proper conversation, judaism requires a lot of historical context to understand. I will be the first one to publicly state that I do not know everything and for example @Catch The Rainbow it's far more knowledgeable than I am in a lot of areas.


But if we were to talk about Jewish theologic understanding you have to understand how the talmud works and what it is. This means jettison all the preconceptions that you learned on 4chan and /pol/ and actually understanding what you're reading (this is why many Jews actually liked Charlie Kirk because even even though we disagree completely with the Divinity of Jesus Christ, Charlie Kirk at least knew what he was talking about. He could argue and support his support his arguments) (now I and every other Jew disagree with the conclusions that Charlie Kirk came to in regards to the conclusions that he made that supported his Christian faith, I cannot argue with the fact that the guy knew what he was reading).


But unless Josh is willing to give us Jews moderating status for that thread or something. It will turn into a shit show. I and I imagine other Jews are not against answering questions, but you can see even in this thread here. How many retards come in here spouting bullshit unironically, and just end up repeating the shit they learned in their brown majdjas. Also, rabbi's are effectively just lawyers. That's why so many rabbis have different opinions. They're basically lawyers. They study a particular area of rabbinic law and they become experts in that area of a law. And if you even issue in regards to that area of rabbinic law, you go and get their opinion. This is similar to the Catholics where if you have an issue pertaining to some area of Catholic law, you go to a particular part of the church that is an expert in that area. The difference is that because we don't have the third Temple, we cannot create the Sanhedrin (which is basically the Jewish version of the supreme Court) which means we cannot come up with definitive rulings, and because we don't have the cohenim appoint the Sanhedrin and thus we also can't have what is equivalent to our executive branch (this would be King David and the davinic line), to execute the rulings of Sanhedrin (hence why the temple is very important). So what Judaism basically has become is a nation without a land, and without a government, trying to keep the traditions alive when we did have a nation for when we are able to re-establish the nation that we once had (hence why Israel is very important).


I'll give you a very quick example of what I'm talking about. This is an argument that I've had on the farms. The talmud which is nothing more than legal oral arguments, defines a legal man and a legal woman at 13 for a man and 12 and a day for a woman (there are some counter arguments that do talk about signs of puberty also. Defining what a man and a woman are but that's a section I don't know well enough). Now according to groypers and /pol/tards and people on this website who should know better. This means that Judaism supports pedophilia. However, later on in the talmud it states that if a if a father were to "sell" his daughter to an older man that it is a kin to him selling her into prostitution and thus should not be allowed and should be discouraged. So looking at this we're presented with a couple basic facts. The first is is that there has to be some legal definition of what an adult is, this is no different than the age of consent/majority being 18, except you know these laws were written to thousands of years ago so they made it a puberty and they just made it 13. However, they're not exactly " selling" in the traditional sense, a woman has the right to decline the sale, but also it's done in order to ensure that the husband is legally required to care for and provide for the wife. These laws/judicial rulings also mean While technically you can marry a 12-year-old if you're 58. In reality it's impossible. The 12-year-old is in no place to consent and thus cannot agree to the marriage (to agree to the marriage, there is a mental understanding. It's a whole other set of laws). And it's important to remember that Judaism you can't pick and choose. Many people confuse Judaism with Islam and how it works.

In Islam you can marry a 9-year-old and it's allowed because Muhammad did, and the belief is that Muhammad was a perfect person and thus did nothing wrong. In Judaism, every single patriarch and matriarch is flawed in some way. Even Moses (hence why Moses wasn't allowed to come into the land of Israel).

Whereas in Judaism I cannot marry a 12-year-old because it would violate 12 other laws. And in Christianity (basically anything that's not a Protestant sect) I cannot marry a 12-year-old because it violates 12 other laws, in Islam those laws really don't exist.

But guess what I'm saying is that I'm more than willing to have these conversations. It's just incredibly long and complicated and there's a certain level of maturity that I think many people on this website are more than capable of, but there's also a lot of fucking retards who will shit this place up because when they hear the word Jew they I don't know have a mental breakdown. Also a lot of what Jews do is incredibly silly outside looking in, and a lot of the more stereotypical stuff is very traditional, but there's really no difference between what the Jews are doing and what many Catholics do in terms of traditions (and to be honest, many Muslims too. But that's a a whole other argument. I'm not going to get into it now).

All in all if you want to learn or you want to see these conversations, you got to come in with an open mind. And get ready for the most pedantic shit you've ever seen.


Basically if you want a thread full of Ben Shapiro's and kirks I'm all for it. But what I'm not for is the billionth fucking groyper talking about "muh uss Liberty" or some made up talmudic quotes that he read online. And Josh is going to have to give us moderating powers over that thread because the fucking goyium cannot behave.


Last point and this is more of a personal thing, for a "neo-nazi hell site" I've had more genuine and constructive conversations regarding Judaism and Israel than I have ever had on any other website, that includes Reddit, or any discord group, or 4chan or wherever. And I have personally in real life countered people who claim that this website is full of white supremacist Nazis, so I'd be down to have conversations with people but there has to be a way to keep the brown people out.