Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

Israel is the opposite due to the embedded Ashkenazi deep state that's slowly being killed
You say it like it's a bad thing?


(I fully support the mixing of Jewish Diaspora group so we can return to one true Judaism)

Well, if I just wish the ashkenazim would reconnect with our diaspora European Roots, the fact that the hasidics are the only ones who use Yiddish And refuse to continue ashkenazic a cultural traditions is a shonda. If the Sephardic and everyone else continue to at least keep up some of their traditional regional jewish practices then we should to. What I'm saying is that I'm annoyed that the only people I have to practice Yiddish with literally believe in crap My ancestors in the shtle didn't even believe in.

(Fellow jews dm me if you want to hear the rest of my kvetching)


Macron: Any international coalition in Hormuz will require coordination with the Iranians

I'm telling you the euros are so afraid of upsetting their loud minorities they will freeze themselves into irrelevance.
 
That's a sympathetic position but it's more complicated than that. As just a single example, at some point in the lifecycle of the product you produce some amount of human labor is involved. Humans eat food. Producing food either requires fertilizer or feed that itself requires fertilizer. Fertilizer (and its inputs) are being heavily affected by the reduced shipping. The indirect impact of fuels on the global economy (via, for example its impact on transportation prices) is similar. There are innumerable other such indirect factors.
The key stress factors always involve global supply, but it is not so simple, I agree with you. Who controls where you can drop and ship off too.
Can bypass perfectly fine ports, to land in a better place for taxes/law/commodities to backtrack to later, and do it all again. Politicians win again.
The reduced shipping, is because they cant get the iranian trannies on Kharg anymore.
 
Joe Kent ragequits his sinceure job because of Joo sperging. Great job dumbass. He also essentially says "stop being mean to Iran" in his resignation letter.


No wonder he lost both congressional runs.
“Should we constantly counter signal and slow roll the agenda of our Party’s Leader?”

Or

“Should we engage in the same tribalism as the Dems, and allow the party to maintain its size or even expand?”


Republicans are retarded. I get wanting to have principles and shit, but why get into the game at a national level if you’re not willing to play ball?
 
Just hallow out the NATO dude. Why even keep troops in EU at this point.
Because Russia. No seriously, nato only exists because the Soviet Union did. However any argument of NATOs potential irrelevance went out the window when Russia formally invaded Ukraine. The difference is that the Russians have zero occupational goals and would instead rather see the ex Soviet member states have a Russian aligned government similar to Belarus, while leading an economic union that can compete with the EU and a foreign policy influence on par with what the Soviets once had.

If Russia did not invade Ukraine, we would be having a very real conversation about the relevance of NATO and how it stands.

I once again will quote. Joe Biden: " there is no moral center in Europe without the United States"
 
The funny thing is that even a symbolic action to help in the straight or even just show support would’ve gone down much better than this. This middle finger will definitely be remembered.

There’s almost three years left of Trump’s presidency. He's a petty man who holds grudges. Europe better hope nothing happens during those three years.
 
Asking other nations to contribute when they don't actually need to is going to backfire massively on the nations that decline to help, moreso for those that are using it as an opportunity to be smug.

What Trump is really asking these nations is: are you a serious player that is worth America's time?

The way Japan has declined can be worked with. Germany just fucked themselves over even further, like they do.
As usual, you guys don't need to fill out an apology form for me. Just play Chrono Trigger this year.
 
Joe Kent ragequits his sinceure job because of Joo sperging. Great job dumbass. He also essentially says "stop being mean to Iran" in his resignation letter.


No wonder he lost both congressional runs.
Well, someone pointed out that he tried hitting up Nick Fuentes at the peak of Nick's glowing after J6th. Which tanked his run as well.

So his judgement isn't the best.
 
video of the U.S.S Gerald Ford doing flight ops showing its bridge

half if not more of the entire bridge is brown/black and or a woman
Wyświetl załącznik 8712312Wyświetl załącznik 8712313Wyświetl załącznik 8712317Wyświetl załącznik 8712320Wyświetl załącznik 8712323Wyświetl załącznik 8712336
Wyświetl załącznik 8712325


when did we turn into the Somali navy with UN advisors?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jMj3bysgrgk
Weird how they are not showing the damage from the missile hit.
 
(Fellow jews dm me if you want to hear the rest of my kvetching)
There's generally such a strong sequestering of right-wing perspectives (as opposed to Leftist, internationalist ones) due to language and information access that that this is the first time I'm hearing of this.
Why not kvetch publicly to enlighten people on this?
 
I did not say America would ever be militarily defeated by Iran, especially not at this point, what they can do rendering strategic failures by holding down Hormuz for so long it actually starts fucking up the economy for real, or even the current IRGC regime just barely surviving would be a victory for the people in charge.
The straight is not an effective lever against America. It hurts the US much less than it hurts other nations including Iran's own allies. Even if it managed to fuck up the American economy that wouldn't stop the attack or change its logistics in anyway. The US already owns all the bombs and planes it's using no new purchases are required. The millitary decisions are made from an insulated command structure that is not effected by the economy.
 
“Should we constantly counter signal and slow roll the agenda of our Party’s Leader?”

Or

“Should we engage in the same tribalism as the Dems, and allow the party to maintain its size or even expand?”


Republicans are retarded. I get wanting to have principles and shit, but why get into the game at a national level if you’re not willing to play ball?
Because domestically the United States is a multi-party system wearing the coat of a two-party system. What redditors and the europores don't understand, is that why the United States has two parties, they're effectively broken down into the two major ideologies of the United States: you either support a strong federal government and a weak state government or you support a strong state government and a weak federal government. This has been The stance since the beginning of the country with the Federalists and Anti-Federalists (*cough cough* John Adams and Thomas Jefferson *cough cough*). However, if you peel away those two major tents, what you see is many little coalitions and factions. For example, the Republican party is everything from retard groypers to dipshit isolationists, to full on neocons, to RINOs. Well, the Democratic party is everything from literal DSA Communists, to DINOs (democratic in name only), to whatever Chuck Schumer is. The real question, when it comes to which party is it going to come on top? Is which party can coalition build the best. And right now for the past 20 years, the issue has been that the Democrats cannot coalition build. The Republicans are very good at it. Once an official strategy is built, everyone basically falls into lockstep, whoever is their whip is very good at couring favors.

In many ways that's why BB is probably one of the best politicians globally and definitely the last 20 years. The man knows how to coalition build. That's also how Trump is so popular. He's highly divisive but behind the scenes. He knows how to coalition build. He knows how to scratch people's backs and to make sure that his back is scratched.

The problem is that this leads to political atrophy and you see this in Israel all the time. Where the opposition party just exists in order to get the winning party out (the Israeli left and the Israeli opposition parties are basically dead because they've spent the past 30 years focusing on one thing, that being showing that Bibi leaves; this meant that when the one time Likud couldn't win a majority. The replacement party was made up of a coalition that included far left parties coalition with far right religious Arabs/muslims and religious Jews), so if they do come into power they don't have any goals. They can't focus on anything so they flounder. In Israel that led to riots within the Arab sector and a real concern of national unity between the Arab society and the Jewish society because basic governance couldn't be agreed upon. In the United States you end up with the Biden administration. Where Joe biden's foreign policy if left alone probably wouldn't have been that bad. However, because the Democratic party couldn't whip its coalition parties into shape. They were undercutting the Biden administration at every turn thus making it incompetent.

The clearest example this is Israel. After October 7th, the Democrats couldn't keep their coalition parties in shape to shut the fuck up about Israel and the Palestinians and thus the undercut Biden foreign policy. However, under the Trump administration, the Israelis and the Trump administration do have disagreements. However, we don't really hear about it because the Republicans are able to keep it internal and under wraps. That's why people like Tucker Carlson and fuentes get thrown out. Their stupidity threatens the Republican party's unified coalition messaging.

This is why Biden won in 2020. The Trump administration and the Republican party couldn't deal with the fact that they had state representatives counter-signaling the national leadership over covid. Compare that to the Biden administration which had a clear definable goal and objective.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that to be a successful coalition you have to allow arguing but they cannot become public. The Democrats love to make their arguments public, there and it is safer for the Republican party to jettison anyone who insists on bringing internal arguments to the public Forefront.
 
Iran can keep the Straits closed indefinitely. Trump demanding that the Europeans send some frigates and minesweepers to face down thousands of Iranian drones and missiles while the 2 carrier groups cower 1000kms from the coast, is particularly hilarious (I assume he's trolling).
The logistics of their coastal drones and boats can't be maintained, especially if the US (or "allies") occupies some key islands and coastal areas. IMO the straits will be open within a week or two, one way or another.
TLDR Iran has already won the war, short of Israel launching some nukes it's baked in.
The Islamist government may survive somehow, but that's not exactly winning.
Mike Johnson calls the guy who quit because of Iran a fucking retard who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Lol, Jew Johnson endorsed Kent in his second failed congressional run.
10242024_1234_175111.webp
Kent lost twice by about 1% - 3% to a Democrat feminist party drone in Washington's 3rd district. (local news coverage video)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The funny thing is that even a symbolic action to help in the straight or even just show support would’ve gone down much better than this. This middle finger will definitely be remembered.

There’s almost three years left of Trump’s presidency. He's a petty man who holds grudges. Europe better hope nothing happens during those three years.
They're basically leveraging the sum of all outcomes and picking the least decisive of them.

There are basically 2 (technically 3 but lol at this point) scenarios of what could happen next:

1) US stays in the AO and continues ops against Iran indefinitely
2) US takes its win, and metaphorically "packs up and goes home"; i.e. suspends offensive combat ops.
3) Iran ass-pulls a 4th quarter win and somehow pulls off a major hit on a carrier or offs a CENTCOM commander or something

If scenario 1 happens, the Euros are basically betting that the US will eventually get control of the strait, because of the US fails to then it hurts them more than it hurts us.

If scenario 2 happens, they are basically betting that a butthurt and defeated Iran stops tard-raging in the strait and traffic resumes as normal.

If scenario 3 happens, they are hoping that Iran doesn't hold a grudge on them and/or start upping the cost of doing business in the strait.

History tells them that Scenario 1 is assumedly the most likely, if so all they risk is pissing off a forthcoming lame duck Trump.
Even if scenario 2 goes down, the regime is likely going to be so starved for profit that they'd stop the tard-raging, at least for countries which didn't help the US and publicly disavowed Israel or whatever.

It's not a bad gamble, per se, it's just kinda risky should the US fuck off and Iran fail to stop shooting suicide drones at everything that moves.
 
There's generally such a strong sequestering of right-wing perspectives (as opposed to Leftist, internationalist ones) due to language and information access that that this is the first time I'm hearing of this.
Why not kvetch publicly to enlighten people on this?
I would love to see a Jewish explaining Jewish things Thread here, but I'm sure it would be a shitshow because some niggers wouldn't be able to behave.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole