Sarah Nyberg / Srhbutts Internet Defense Force - It's Okay To be a Pedo As Long As He's Trans/Anti-GG

"from a decade go"

And the whole Bill Cosby thing seems to be from the 70's so I guess by SJW logic, Linda Ridgeway is a liar because 'that happened years ago!'.

Time doesn't immediately mean innocence, guys.
 
The info brought to the surface is mostly shit in the logs, but there is a few new things, and these are sort of important.

First, like @AnOminous said, there's establishment here. Nyberg defends pedophilia with such vehemence and such aggression that it's abundantly clear that she's waist-deep. Essentially, you're looking at an Anontalk scenario here, where anything shy of outright explicit CP is being defended by the FFShrine logs, and in this being a case of them openly sharing child nudity, there's no longer any question as to Nyberg's involvement. Any defense of "She was just joking around" dies when she distributed.

Second, and this is critical: Nyberg's involvement seems to be following the Nick Bate paradigm, wherein action is only taken after extensive investigation, where Dana's parents knew about Nyberg, but not to the degree. I am very interested in seeing what happens after this.

In fact, dear Izzy's been nice enough to oblige:


And people are watching Sarah's follower count in preparation for what's to come:


Meanwhile, Anti-GG elements are continuing to try to flood CP onto 8chan as the mods have gone out of their way to add CAPTCHA to prevent bot floods. We'll see what happens.

EDIT: Milo's AMA on KIA recently revealed that this will not be the last time he covers Nyberg.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I find it very telling that "Alice's" parents didn't let Sick Nick the Second around her alone. He must have been full on creeping on her at that point. I wonder if he's actually abused any kids at this point himself, or limits himself to child pornography.
 
And people are watching Sarah's follower count in preparation for what's to come:

[MEDIA=twitter]642441449217245184[/MEDIA][MEDIA=twitter]642445546997870592[/MEDIA]

I don't know what would be funnier, if it goes down or up!

They are really tying themselves to the mast here aren't they.
 
1442006946680.jpg

I meaaaannnn.... seriously?

>implying sadism is less deviant than pedophilia
 

If this blows up in Pless's stupid face I'll give Milo a fucking medal.

He's been accused of pedophilia pretty consistently. The dogfucking thing was him quoting someone else. Furthermore, he's filed DMCA takedowns on the logs, thereby legally asserting ownership.

Is anyone else making a list of Nyberg's most vocal supporters for further investigation?

Actually, ED is doing that now whilst quietly lining up all of the most vociferous of Nyberg's supporters for further digging.

Watch your ass, Izzy: You're next.

>implying sadism is less deviant than pedophilia

They're hardly mutually exclusive. See also: Jay Geis.

ADDENDUM: I'd like to remind everyone that as bad as these are, these are the public chat-logs. According to Roph, the private logs of Nyberg's make these look clean by comparison.
 
1442004395867.jpg

"underage teenager" ,"woman" kek
"Revealing picture"
Okay.
Photo of some dude's hairy chest (that he took and uploaded himself) that doesn't even reach the nipples = BAD AND REVEALING
Sharing photos (likely taken without permission) of their 8 year old cousin's crotch to share with a bunch of pedophiles = ABSOLUTELY OKAY!!

There is absolutely no helping these people.
 
Holy fucking shit. I knew some of the noise, but didn't realize the full thing.

Beyond the pedo thing (and I don't mean to diminish that, I just don't have all those facts), if she was posting pirated things for financial gain; well that's criminal in the US [17USC506(a) / 18USC2319]


EDIT : sorry if that's already been brought up. Just wanted to address that up because some folks aren't aware of the diff between civil and criminal.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Pathetic and disgusting.

None of these creeps would think twice about denouncing the Roman Catholic Church for shielding pedophiles, meanwhile, they vociferously defend an ardent, proselytizing pedophile who aggressively promoted pedophilia for years.
 
Pathetic and disgusting.

None of these creeps would think twice about denouncing the Roman Catholic Church for shielding pedophiles, meanwhile, they vociferously defend an ardent, proselytizing pedophile who aggressively promoted pedophilia for years.

With how stubborn all these people are being, it's strange. Do you think maybe Butts has some dirt on them? Like, if they roll on Butts, then Butts will release something like private, CP-filled, Skype chats they have had with all of them? 'Cause really, nothing less than utter social destruction should keep someone from even THINKING of defending a pedo.

Why can't people have 'normal' fucked-up fetishes anymore? It's all kiddie diddlers now, when back in the good ol' days the shocking reveals of this kind of stuff were more fun. You had shit like people being eaten, or turning into wetsuits, or...Well, you know. Furry drawings you can't unsee. Now it's just depressing 'cause there is a real life kid out there who is fucked up for life because of this perv.
 
Man maybe if Nick Bate had thrown in with anti gamergate folks I wonder how much different his story would have turned out.

If someone is accused of being a pedophile that's a serious accusation, one would think when faced with such an accusation people could think more critically then gamergate/anti-gamergate. If someone that shared my politics was accused I think I would want to find out everything and old evidence/came from gamergate wouldn't be enough for me to just dismiss it and go shithouse crazy defending the accused. Wouldn't they be better serving Sarah by trying to get her side of the story and finding evidence to support her rather than just ranting loudly into the twittersphere about dumb internet politics.

One would think that the safety of a child would be at least slightly more important than internet politics.
 
Man maybe if Nick Bate had thrown in with anti gamergate folks I wonder how much different his story would have turned out.

If someone is accused of being a pedophile that's a serious accusation, one would think when faced with such an accusation people could think more critically then gamergate/anti-gamergate. If someone that shared my politics was accused I think I would want to find out everything and old evidence/came from gamergate wouldn't be enough for me to just dismiss it and go shithouse crazy defending the accused. Wouldn't they be better serving Sarah by trying to get her side of the story and finding evidence to support her rather than just ranting loudly into the twittersphere about dumb internet politics.

One would think that the safety of a child would be at least slightly more important than internet politics.

Nah dude. They're like the weasels in your avatar.
Undeniable Evidence = Doesn't matter! Keep charging!
Narrative is Falling Apart = Keep charging! Bite him harder! Scream louder!
Ruining Their Reputation by Associating With A Pedophile = No one stops until he is dead! If you do, I'll kill you myself!
Meanwhile, everyone else is just flinging that article around like a club going 'Seriously, why won't you guys give up? It's just getting pathetic now.'
 
Nah dude. They're like the weasels in your avatar.
Undeniable Evidence = Doesn't matter! Keep charging!
Narrative is Falling Apart = Keep charging! Bite him harder! Scream louder!
Ruining Their Reputation by Associating With A Pedophile = No one stops until he is dead! If you do, I'll kill you myself!
Meanwhile, everyone else is just flinging that article around like a club going 'Seriously, why won't you guys give up? It's just getting pathetic now.'

Actually, considering how damaging the Nyberg lynchpin is to Anti-GG as a whole? It makes perfect sense that they'd defend it:

Katherine Cross supports Sarah Nyberg.
Katherine Cross is FemFreq's mouthpiece.
Feminist Frequency is paid by Intel for consulting purposes.
Ergo, Feminist Frequency ergo supports Pedophiles.
Thusly, Intel, via FemFreq, supports Pedophiles.

That right there's being loaded into email barrages by GG supporters en masse. And it's irony served cold. I love it.
 
Actually, considering how damaging the Nyberg lynchpin is to Anti-GG as a whole? It makes perfect sense that they'd defend it:

Katherine Cross supports Sarah Nyberg.
Katherine Cross is FemFreq's mouthpiece.
Feminist Frequency is paid by Intel for consulting purposes.
Ergo, Feminist Frequency ergo supports Pedophiles.
Thusly, Intel, via FemFreq, supports Pedophiles.

That right there's being loaded into email barrages by GG supporters en masse. And it's irony served cold. I love it.
Somehow anti-GG will spin this while simultaneously astroturfing CP onto 8chan.
 
Actually, considering how damaging the Nyberg lynchpin is to Anti-GG as a whole? It makes perfect sense that they'd defend it:

Katherine Cross supports Sarah Nyberg.
Katherine Cross is FemFreq's mouthpiece.
Feminist Frequency is paid by Intel for consulting purposes.
Ergo, Feminist Frequency ergo supports Pedophiles.
Thusly, Intel, via FemFreq, supports Pedophiles.

That right there's being loaded into email barrages by GG supporters en masse. And it's irony served cold. I love it.

Are all these bastards who are AGG top brass also completely sick fucks by total coincidence? Next thing we know, it's not just child porn but a whole network of illegal recreational drugs these psychopaths have been abusing, too. Certainly would explain a lot.

Somehow anti-GG will spin this while simultaneously astroturfing CP onto 8chan.
Actually, I don't think even they're stupid enough to try that.

Not after the one moron already attempted it, got caught by Hotwheels almost immediately, and the dumbass not only still tried to call the authorities on 8chan for having CP, but outright told the authorities he had saved all the cp on his computer for evidence.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole