Sarah Nyberg / Srhbutts Internet Defense Force - It's Okay To be a Pedo As Long As He's Trans/Anti-GG


I am so fucking confused by people trying to excuse it by saying "oh they were just acting edgy".
I'm just going to assume they haven't read any of the logs and just think it was Butts saying "edgy" stuff once or twice like "I'm gonna rape all the childrens lel" and "I LOVE LITTLE GIRLS THEY MAKE ME FEEL SO GOOD".
There's a big difference between someone saying stuff like that to stir people up versus -years- of someone saying their underage cousin is hot and sharing crotch shots of 8 year olds in a chatroom.

The mental gymnastics, criminey.
 
*FULL DAMAGE CONTROL MODE*.....*ENGAGED*
1441995833752.png
 
I guess that person doesn't realize that Butts' family is talking to Milo willingly, and if asking his family questions is tantamount to harassment just makes it look like he has a history he's trying to hide.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]642397904259256321[/MEDIA]
I am so fucking confused by people trying to excuse it by saying "oh they were just acting edgy".

If Milo is being even remotely truthful, the victim's family confirms that like Nick Bate, Sarah Butts was not just being "edgy." There is an actual victim.

If anything, people have been mildly disappointed at Milo's past articles, like that on Randi Harper, being oversold and then not being particularly new information. However, they did more or less confirm and vetted information that was previously out there.

If this article is the same, it will confirm, vetted by lawyers, that it is simply a true statement that Sarah Butts is not merely an outspoken pedophile, but an actual sexually predatory pedophile with at least one victim.
 
Yeah, I get where you were going but that kind of accessory after the fact thing doesn't quite apply here. I believe the element of accessory after the fact not met is that you have to show that the purported accessory had actual knowledge of the felony, not merely suspicion. I'm also frankly rather unsure that the acts undertaken would constitute prohibited acts... the WebCite thing is close but I don't think it's good enough given the circumstances that the evidence is already widespread. If that's criminal I think it'd more be the separate offense of obstruction rather than something that would result in attaching liability for felonies Butts may have committed in the past.

Apparently, the logs being on Web Cite is strong evidence that the logs came from ffshrine as opposed to being faked. And Izzy just tried to destroy that evidence...
 
Why is Milo humoring Nyberg by using feminine pronouns? For all I can tell, Nyberg is just a weird effeminate guy with long hair but fully functional members and a "carpet of virility".

I guess that the reason is so he can avoid complaints of "transmisogyny" that Nyberg's supporters would've thrown and created a distraction to the whole idea.
 
Why is Milo humoring Nyberg by using feminine pronouns? For all I can tell, Nyberg is just a weird effeminate guy with long hair but fully functional members and a "carpet of virility".

I guess that the reason is so he can avoid complaints of "transmisogyny" that Nyberg's supporters would've thrown and created a distraction to the whole idea.
That's exactly the reason I'm sure, to not give them any excuses. I've seen so many people just disregard a post or article because the writer used "incorrect" pronouns.

Not that those sort of people would read and listen to Milo's articles to start with, but still...
 
Why is Milo humoring Nyberg by using feminine pronouns? For all I can tell, Nyberg is just a weird effeminate guy with long hair but fully functional members and a "carpet of virility".

Probably because of a little habit SJWs have.
They like to nitpick. Find one little thing off, out of your entire argument, and use that to invalidate the entire thing.
If he hadn't used the 'proper' pronouns, every single rebuttal to the article would have been something along the lines of "He didn't use her proper pronouns! Milo is a transphobe! I don't listen to transphobes!" And it would cause a whole bunch of extra trouble.
 
Thanks Mr. Yiannpoullos, I will now proceed to sprinkle this salt over my breakfast now! It seems they have decided to sink with the captain of the pedo ship.
1441997458373.png

"Im pressing all buttons but nothing is happening"
1442004289745-1.png

You are still a pedo enabler, though.
1442004473592-0.jpg

"Hey guys plz don't click the article, because... you might form your own opinion!"
1442004395867.jpg

"underage teenager" ,"woman" kek
1442005540683.png

Hahahahahaha
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I want to hurl. While most of the big name anti's are wisely ignoring the Breitbomb, that asshole Arthur Chu is doubling down on white knighting Pedobutts.
 
I can imagine the shitstorm that Briebart could create if Twitter suspends Milo because of this. Feels desperate to call him to get suspended when anyone can link that article (and specially now that is featured). The right wing machine is used to this stuff before SJWs took their marketing courses.
 
I can imagine the shitstorm that Briebart could create if Twitter suspends Milo because of this. Feels desperate to call him to get suspended when anyone can link that article (and specially now that is featured). The right wing machine is used to this stuff before SJWs took their marketing courses.

This is one of those cases where I really hope they succeed at their Twitter campaign and blow up the scandal about this child molester permanently into the mainstream, completely ruining this guy's life.

It would be such epic fail.
 
I can imagine the shitstorm that Briebart could create if Twitter suspends Milo because of this. Feels desperate to call him to get suspended when anyone can link that article (and specially now that is featured). The right wing machine is used to this stuff before SJWs took their marketing courses.
Yeah, I don't think Twitter is likely to get involved. They should know better.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]642397904259256321[/MEDIA]

Maybe this Tegiminis guy could provide us with a few logs of what "edgy" stuff he was saying in his youth. Who knows, maybe he was "trolling" around by sharing and jerking off to pictures of underage girls too (but only as a joke ofcourse! he wasn't serious when he was jerking off to underage girls, he was just being "edgy")
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole