Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
And people are watching Sarah's follower count in preparation for what's to come:
[MEDIA=twitter]642441449217245184[/MEDIA][MEDIA=twitter]642445546997870592[/MEDIA]
![]()
I meaaaannnn.... seriously?
He's been accused of pedophilia pretty consistently. The dogfucking thing was him quoting someone else. Furthermore, he's filed DMCA takedowns on the logs, thereby legally asserting ownership.
He's been accused of pedophilia pretty consistently. The dogfucking thing was him quoting someone else. Furthermore, he's filed DMCA takedowns on the logs, thereby legally asserting ownership.
Is anyone else making a list of Nyberg's most vocal supporters for further investigation?
>implying sadism is less deviant than pedophilia
"Revealing picture"![]()
"underage teenager" ,"woman" kek
It sure as shit is.Beyond the pedo thing (and I don't mean to diminish that, I just don't have all those facts), if she was posting pirated things for financial gain; well that's criminal in the US [17USC506(a) / 18USC2319]
Pathetic and disgusting.
None of these creeps would think twice about denouncing the Roman Catholic Church for shielding pedophiles, meanwhile, they vociferously defend an ardent, proselytizing pedophile who aggressively promoted pedophilia for years.
Man maybe if Nick Bate had thrown in with anti gamergate folks I wonder how much different his story would have turned out.
If someone is accused of being a pedophile that's a serious accusation, one would think when faced with such an accusation people could think more critically then gamergate/anti-gamergate. If someone that shared my politics was accused I think I would want to find out everything and old evidence/came from gamergate wouldn't be enough for me to just dismiss it and go shithouse crazy defending the accused. Wouldn't they be better serving Sarah by trying to get her side of the story and finding evidence to support her rather than just ranting loudly into the twittersphere about dumb internet politics.
One would think that the safety of a child would be at least slightly more important than internet politics.
Nah dude. They're like the weasels in your avatar.
Undeniable Evidence = Doesn't matter! Keep charging!
Narrative is Falling Apart = Keep charging! Bite him harder! Scream louder!
Ruining Their Reputation by Associating With A Pedophile = No one stops until he is dead! If you do, I'll kill you myself!
Meanwhile, everyone else is just flinging that article around like a club going 'Seriously, why won't you guys give up? It's just getting pathetic now.'
Somehow anti-GG will spin this while simultaneously astroturfing CP onto 8chan.Actually, considering how damaging the Nyberg lynchpin is to Anti-GG as a whole? It makes perfect sense that they'd defend it:
Katherine Cross supports Sarah Nyberg.
Katherine Cross is FemFreq's mouthpiece.
Feminist Frequency is paid by Intel for consulting purposes.
Ergo, Feminist Frequency ergo supports Pedophiles.
Thusly, Intel, via FemFreq, supports Pedophiles.
That right there's being loaded into email barrages by GG supporters en masse. And it's irony served cold. I love it.
Actually, considering how damaging the Nyberg lynchpin is to Anti-GG as a whole? It makes perfect sense that they'd defend it:
Katherine Cross supports Sarah Nyberg.
Katherine Cross is FemFreq's mouthpiece.
Feminist Frequency is paid by Intel for consulting purposes.
Ergo, Feminist Frequency ergo supports Pedophiles.
Thusly, Intel, via FemFreq, supports Pedophiles.
That right there's being loaded into email barrages by GG supporters en masse. And it's irony served cold. I love it.
Actually, I don't think even they're stupid enough to try that.Somehow anti-GG will spin this while simultaneously astroturfing CP onto 8chan.