2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Pence is still the President of the Senate until January 20th. He counts the Electoral Votes.

House votes by State Delegation, not individual congressman. Republicans control the most delegations. Even if Republicans lose the run-off, that means 50-50 split in the Senate which means, with Pence as tiebreaker, Republicans could get re-elected
He's probably accounting for RINOs when it comes to the Senate. That being said, this is mostly based on the Electoral Count Act due to the Constitution not being clear on how Congress counting votes works if the election is contested aside from it going to a contingent election. So you can expect leftists to shill the Electoral Count Act for the next few weeks despite it being mocked by legal historians ever since it was introduced for being an absolute mess that doesn't really help clear up the process at all. Everyone should read that pdf I linked, he goes into it from a neutral perspective and it'll be very insightful now that we've reached this point. Personally, I think the least chaotic solution would be a contingent election, it's the only remedy listed in the Constitution for something like this.
 
I usually go outside every few hours to feed my dog so maybe I will. Still doesn't change the fact the dems will take the senate and pedos will run rampant for the next 4 years.
"a-a-and trump will put gay people a-a-and mexicans in concentration camps!"
Have you no sense of irony?
 
Well, by this argument, yes! See, you had literally years to correct these potential problems, which would have happened in every election leading up to this one. That's laches.

But you could try to argue that enough fraud happened here that the results should be overturned. This case would argue that ballots treated this way are totally invalid on an arcane technicality regarding putting a zip code or the state's two letters in, and could then use that to try to find via handwriting differences enough of these potentially fraudulent ballots to throw enough suspicion.
baker v nelson happened in 1971, obergefell and its proponents had 44 years to contest nelson. why wait so long for something that happened in every year prior to 2015?

i guess because its not an election with orange bad man they cant apply laches.

its only an archane technicality because upholding it as the law states would let drumpdt win.

there is no authority for clerks to modify the witness line.
Speaking of, how many of these ballots are you alleging exist? 400? 4000? 4? Oh, right, "I dunno." "Maybe a whole lot." Yeah, real solid grounds to throw out 200k which predominantly went to your opponent.
Adding in a state or a zip code is such a minor item that of course no-one would fucking record it, particularly given that this conflict between the WEC guidelines and a specific reading of legislation wasn't brought up until now. And by this court's ruling, STILL isn't an issue, because the court wasn't issuing a judgment on the correct interpretation of that legislation. It's not that you failed to prove there were a ton of fraudulent ballots with this case; you failed to prove that they could even be called fraudulent.
the state cant present numbers in contrast because it doesnt know either. it acknowledges the actions happened, so we know more than 0. like everything else you allege about this election there's no evidence for the state to present either. they could easily present numbers if tgey have them.

sounds like the state fucked up but admitting it means trump wins.

And why wasn't this a problem when Trump won the state in 2016; why didn't you handle it then, when the republicans purposefully mixed ballots because courts would be hesitant to throw those out?

In other words, yes, you lost fair and square and on every single challenge to that idea thusfar.

trump won? what harm came to him? trump lost? he had 9 years to contest somehow.

again the states havent provided evidence trump lost fairly. are you aware of az,'s fed only ballot without citizenship test exists?

e: ballots that dont conform to election laws are improper and casting them is fraud
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
There is no doubt that the GOP Representatives will definitely file objections to the result itself, but the question is: Will they have at least 1 Senator to help them out?

Ironically, any senator that has any aspirations of being President(namely Cruz) will join in, knowing that the Senate won't vote against electors, and thus assure they'll never have a fair shot at the presidency.
 
"a-a-and trump will put gay people a-a-and mexicans in concentration camps!"
Have you no sense of irony?
"TRUMP WILL KILL ALL THE LATINX AND WILL BE LITERALLY HITLER! WE ARE THE RESISTANCE THAT WILL STOP HIM FROM MAKING AMERICA INTO A HANDMAIDEN'S TALE!" - Statement seen as laughable from the doomers 4 years ago

"BIDEN WILL FORCE ALL OUR SONS INTO BEING TRANNIES, PEDOPHILIA WILL BE LEGALIZED, AND WE'LL BE PUT INTO RE-EDUCATION CAMPS TO WORSHIP BLACK PEOPLE! CIVIL WAR 2 NOW!" - Statement seen as logical from the doomers today
 
He's probably accounting for RINOs when it comes to the Senate.
Senate votes for the Vice President. Pence is their guy. I'm not saying that RINOs won't cuck out, but I find it less likely than if the Senate voted for the President and the Representatives for the Vice President.
Everyone should read that pdf I linked, he goes into it from a neutral perspective and it'll be very insightful now that we've reached this point.
That PDF is oddly prescient
 
"BIDEN WILL FORCE ALL OUR SONS INTO BEING TRANNIES, PEDOPHILIA WILL BE LEGALIZED, AND WE'LL BE PUT INTO RE-EDUCATION CAMPS TO WORSHIP BLACK PEOPLE! CIVIL WAR 2 NOW!" - Statement seen as logical from the doomers today
To be honest, if you read nothing but @CatParty articles, you easily come to the conclusion that's what's going to happen.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole