in other words, there is no remedy for violations in this election where the violations occured because orange man bad. sure builds the case that democrats purposefully mixed ballots because the courts would be hesistent to throw them out.
the only remedy is to throw out everything because the democrats didnt seperate anything, didnt record anything the first go around.
Well, by this argument, yes! See, you had
literally years to correct these potential problems, which
would have happened in every election leading up to this one. That's laches.
But you
could try to argue that enough fraud happened here that the results should be overturned. This case would argue that ballots treated this way are totally invalid on an arcane technicality regarding
putting a zip code or the state's two letters in, and could then use that to try to find via handwriting differences enough of these potentially fraudulent ballots to throw enough suspicion.
Speaking of, how many of these ballots are you alleging exist? 400? 4000? 4? Oh, right, "I dunno." "Maybe a whole lot." Yeah, real solid grounds to throw out 200k which predominantly went to your opponent.
Adding in a state or a zip code is such a minor item that of course no-one would fucking record it, particularly given that this conflict between the WEC guidelines and a specific reading of legislation wasn't brought up until now. And by this court's ruling, STILL isn't an issue, because the court wasn't issuing a judgment on the correct interpretation of that legislation. It's not that you failed to prove there were a ton of fraudulent ballots with this case;
you failed to prove that they could even be called fraudulent.
And why wasn't this a problem when Trump won the state in 2016; why didn't you handle it then, when the republicans purposefully mixed ballots because courts would be hesitant to throw those out?
In other words, yes, you lost fair and square and on every single challenge to that idea thusfar.
