Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I can never seem to find a non-biased source about which gender is at a disadvantage in the classroom. The ones that say that girls are generally have the conclusion along the lines of "boys are either dominant troublemakers or know-it-all show offs, which keeps the teacher's attention away from the girls." The ones that say the boys are at a disadvantage say things like "boys are assumed to be troublemakers and always interpreted to be the perpetrator of classroom problems, which messes with their self esteem."

I mean, generally boys are punished more in classrooms and more severely, and that continues all the way to high school level. As a whole, I've seen several people claim that boys learn differently than girls and that current educational systems are designed to cater to the latter. But who knows with how biased all these studies are.
 
I can never seem to find a non-biased source about which gender is at a disadvantage in the classroom. The ones that say that girls are generally have the conclusion along the lines of "boys are either dominant troublemakers or know-it-all show offs, which keeps the teacher's attention away from the girls." The ones that say the boys are at a disadvantage say things like "boys are assumed to be troublemakers and always interpreted to be the perpetrator of classroom problems, which messes with their self esteem."

I mean, generally boys are punished more in classrooms and more severely, and that continues all the way to high school level. As a whole, I've seen several people claim that boys learn differently than girls and that current educational systems are designed to cater to the latter. But who knows with how biased all these studies are.
If you want my completely unscientific perspective, I'd say that preteen girls are (broadly) more responsive to authority and more cognizant of what is expected of them, so they tend to fall in line in the classroom. This advantage seems to disappear quickly around puberty, but by then, behaviors have become habits, which is generally beneficial for girls and not so much for boys.
 
If you want my completely unscientific perspective, I'd say that preteen girls are (broadly) more responsive to authority and more cognizant of what is expected of them, so they tend to fall in line in the classroom. This advantage seems to disappear quickly around puberty, but by then, behaviors have become habits, which is generally beneficial for girls and not so much for boys.
Well, my unscientific observation is that a lot of teachers automatically assume that boys are at fault for everything wrong in the classroom, and this enables a lot of bad behavior because if you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, a lot of people will just do. And if they decide not to act out because they're going to get yelled at anyway, they retreat inward and become less involved in order to stay out of trouble.

The school system we have isn't exactly the best environment for boys a lot of the time. It doesn't help that very few male teachers are at the primary level.
 
...while boys and girls were equally intelligent, male intelligence was evolutionarily engineered for hunting, fighting, and scouting... things that were all well and good, but not really desirable skills in the 21st century. Girls's brains, on the other hand, were engineered for communication, creativity and collaboration, which wouldn't you know it just happened to be the skills that allowed them to succeed in school. So it's not that the teachers or their curriculums were discriminatory... it's just that girls were naturally more capable of dealing with such things because that's how their brains were wired.
So girls have an inherent advantage, which the current system caters to at he expense of others? Isn't that privelege? Did the guy really lack the self-awareness to notice what he was saying?
Oh, wait, of course he did.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
93C9BML.png


Only tumblrinas would get upset and offended over the opinions of others on Social Media. Also homophobia apparently covers transphobia now? Also you are a social justice warrior/activist AND an ignorant asshole.

I'm having fun reading their conversations, it's like watching a nature show about a rare breed of animal isolated on an island:

KHvVqWC.png
q4BvLTQ.png
1owWCH1.png

Also congrats on Bruce Jenner doing shit he feels like doing, but people shouldn't be dancing in the streets over it, he's a human, not a god.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
About Bruce Jenner, what makes him so special? Because I live under a Steam library and anime, I just recently heard about this. So some guy makes his switch to female Kamina levels of over-the-top from what I can tell, and suddenly he's on top of the world. Really, I seriously wanna know what sets him apart from other trans people.

Unrelated, but I'm seriously thinking of Tumblr partly to give SJWs a piece of my mind. Please talk me out of this.

Unrelated again, but because I have nothing interesting to contribute here, I decided to look through the 'Fuck No Tumblr SJWs' blog, and found this http://fucknotumblrsjw.tumblr.com/post/6353421380/lets-talk-about-a-little-thing-called-etymology
 
@TheRedRanger: See, it's not privilege if it's women. Women inherently have no privilege and men inherently have privilege. If you don't understand this you've been brainwashed by the patriarchy.
Yeah:
Women doing worse --> they're fucked by the PATRIARCHY
Men doing worse --> they're fucked by the PATRIARCHY AND THEY DESERVE IT!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
About Bruce Jenner, what makes him so special? Because I live under a Steam library and anime, I just recently heard about this. So some guy makes his switch to female Kamina levels of over-the-top from what I can tell, and suddenly he's on top of the world. Really, I seriously wanna know what sets him apart from other trans people.

Unrelated, but I'm seriously thinking of Tumblr partly to give SJWs a piece of my mind. Please talk me out of this.

Unrelated again, but because I have nothing interesting to contribute here, I decided to look through the 'Fuck No Tumblr SJWs' blog, and found this http://fucknotumblrsjw.tumblr.com/post/6353421380/lets-talk-about-a-little-thing-called-etymology


public celebrity. was an olympic gold medalist and was on the kardashian show
 
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
 
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
great, now they're acting like chris-chan, interrupting other people's time with bullshit.
how long before SJWs show up to random things with signs?
 
I read about a SJW who was at an event where Dr. Richard Dawkins spoke. It started talking about how it was raped, which is totally relevant to what he discusses right? Dawkins responded with "nobody gives a fuck, we're talking about atheism and biology, quit wasting everybody's time." They're disowning him, which means I really like Dawkins.
SJWs are like the communist party under Stalin in so many ways. If you're not a sycophant, you're a detractor. And detractors are counter-revolutionary. We all know what happens to them, don't we?
Unless you are being a good SJW and following all (ALL!) SJW tenants, then surely you must be working against the greater good. Perhaps it is time for you to spend a few years in a gulag to remind you how privileged you are, you cis, het, man!
Dawkins is not a good SJW. He thinks for himself and does not include everyone assigned "oppressed" by the Politburo... I mean Tumblr.

Not to mention Dawkins is an Evolutionary biologist. Evolution suggests that some creatures are better suited than others. Perhaps the same applies to humanity. Maybe we are not, as SJWs like to say, all the same.
That, dear Kiwis, is a very, very dangerous thought.
 
I always love how these people do those little conversations that totally really happened, like they think what they're saying is so incisive and witty that it really reads more like a brilliant TV script than just something they wish happened.
 
Not even *pre-op.
Transition is noted as a serious process one of which is because it makes that person irreversibly sterile forever. Otherwise you're A) Enslaving trans women and forcing them to basically live as men for breeding stock you transphobic cunt. or B) Human race is gonna die out. You cunt.
Do they really become sterile? I'm assuming the same isn't also true of transmen because of that man* who was on Oprah for being pregnant.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole