😵‍💫 Skitzocow Gina Marie Fournier / ginafournier1 - "RAPED BY JESUS", serial harasser, banned from the internet

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku GS 281
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Technically, since she is formally diagnosed with multiple mental illnesses, she could receive disability benefit. This would be useful to her in her dire situation. However, she will not claim those benefits because it requires accepting the veracity of the labels. She clearly hopes to go on to publish her story and I imagine she feels hypocritical to claim injustice against her by the mental health system, then acquiesce their diagnoses.
The OCC witch-hunt saga is much murkier, but her claims of malpractice from the hospital are true. They can't give her the Michigan equivalent of a 5150, because she now constantly refutes any and all accusations that she is suicidal (hence the paranoia over 'suicide swatting'). She says her colourfully violent language reflects an 'artistic' rage with no true intentions. These days, they take such denials on word alone.
As for her inability to care for her basic needs, a large part of that, again, is due to her lack of running water, etc. Her homes have been one by one condemned because she cannot afford basic living needs. So it would be a tenuous case to commit her on those grounds. Especially now that she is evicted.
This thread is depressing. It's really sad. Information from her website, videos, facebook, etc.
 
Here's the description from this video. According to this, Gina owed income taxes (probably state income taxes, maybe also federal?) and the state recently was able to take the money out of her account to pay what she owed. Of course she's slotted this into her overarching delusion of persecution.
If the state took money out of her account, it was most likely for a state tax debt. The IRS would be the entity that would seize money from an account to satisfy a federal tax debt.

If the state has levied against her bank account, that generally means the state has already contacted Gina with the amount due, how it was calculated and instructions on what to do next:
  • Pay the balance in full,
  • Apply for an installment agreement to pay the amount with monthly payments,
  • Send a disagreement to the balance due with specific information to support the disagreement.
For the tax debt to result in a levy means that Gina has either let all previous notices go unanswered, or she's sending them back with frivolous claims stating her disagreement. Also, the state sends one last letter stating they intend to pursue levy action if the tax debt isn't paid within x number of days. This is sort of a "last chance before we start pursuing collections" notice that most people take seriously enough to work with the state (or the IRS for a federal tax debt) to avoid the levies, collection actions, or garnishments that will come next.

Edit: her current financial situation. Apologies for the poor quality, it was blurry on her site. But transcribed for ease: she'd basically bought a bunch of food and essentials, had $2752.85 left in her bank account. All of that was drained per 'legal processing fee'. Leaving her balance at $0.00.
That legal processing fee is probably for the aforementioned bank levy. Not only will the state or IRS seize the entire balance if necessary to satisfy a tax debt in full or part, but the bank also assesses its own fee for having to deal with the levy and the time spent processing it. In this case, it looks like the bank charged $75 to process the levy with the remaining $2700+ going towards her state tax debt.
 
Question for Americans. For how long after your dismissal is your employer permitted to monitor your online behaviour or have any kind of mitigation in your life? From reviewing more of Gina's exhaustive documentation, it appears that the police officer Terry McCauley, who is an associate with OCC, was reviewing her facebook posts two years after she was suspended (and fired) from her job. He called for a 'wellness check' (in Gina's words, suicide swat) not only on 2/22/2013, but again on 6/9/2014. By this point, she had even changed address and doesn't live at all within his area of jurisdiction. Is this something that's normal there? Asking as a Eurofag.
(reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehqL5R7-atI )
There's no real confusion over the other 'suicide swat' accounts, which seem to be just people making reports after hearing her 'crying'.
 
Question for Americans. For how long after your dismissal is your employer permitted to monitor your online behaviour or have any kind of mitigation in your life? From reviewing more of Gina's exhaustive documentation, it appears that the police officer Terry McCauley, who is an associate with OCC, was reviewing her facebook posts two years after she was suspended (and fired) from her job. He called for a 'wellness check' (in Gina's words, suicide swat) not only on 2/22/2013, but again on 6/9/2014. By this point, she had even changed address and doesn't live at all within his area of jurisdiction. Is this something that's normal there? Asking as a Eurofag.
(reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehqL5R7-atI )
There's no real confusion over the other 'suicide swat' accounts, which seem to be just people making reports after hearing her 'crying'.

That seems really off to me. I've never seen any business give too much of a shit once they aren't their problem anymore.
 
For how long after your dismissal is your employer permitted to monitor your online behaviour or have any kind of mitigation in your life?
I imagine the general rule would be the most employers would probably cut ties upon dismissal.

However, Gina appears to be an exception to this.

If I recall from the OP, she has either tagged or mentioned past and present employers and people in her life in her social media posts. Tagging would alert them that Gina continues to mention them. And if anyone happens to check her social media, they can see anyone she mentions in her public posts.

Also, from the OP, she made a plea bargain where she pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated stalking. It wouldn't be unusual for whomever Gina was attempting to stalk to want to keep tabs on her to know if she's still obsessed with them or behaving in a way that her behavior towards or against them could escalate.
 
I imagine the general rule would be the most employers would probably cut ties upon dismissal.

However, Gina appears to be an exception to this.

If I recall from the OP, she has either tagged or mentioned past and present employers and people in her life in her social media posts. Tagging would alert them that Gina continues to mention them. And if anyone happens to check her social media, they can see anyone she mentions in her public posts.

Also, from the OP, she made a plea bargain where she pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated stalking. It wouldn't be unusual for whomever Gina was attempting to stalk to want to keep tabs on her to know if she's still obsessed with them or behaving in a way that her behavior towards or against them could escalate.
Your chronology of events isn't entirely correct (I don't blame you, it's a huge mess).

She was arrested and charged for aggravated stalking in 2017, this 'suicide swat' was in 2014. Further, she did not plead guilty to it (though she was found guilty of it). She does constantly namedrop her former employers, i.e. William MacQueen and other OCC / Delta College staff. The person that 'suicide swatted' her was not the person she stalked. She was allegedly stalking her neighbour, but a 'school cop' made the phone call (regarding suicide, not stalking) 3 years prior.

Ref, 2017 stalking arrest
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A compromise would be bringing her in on a 5150 but I don't know if Michigan has an equivalent.

Well here is the part of me that despises these types of interventions at the cost of her (and ultimately our) civil liberties.

I wasn't quite sure what to make of the information given: it is so chaotic.

But from your summary, it sounds like they got it under control. The community and its officials have some sort of balance and she IS under surveillance.

I am not a huge fan of force-feeding people's medications. It is probably hard to do without indisputable justifications because it is a violation of many of her civil rights and other kinds of rights that I can't interpret.

Just speculation on my part.

Maybe they are holding out until that critical moment comes.

Who knows. I just feel bad for this person.
Not sure if this has been answered, but upon research, Michigan seems to have a "Kevin's Law", but an article written about it deemed it a failure. Won't go into too much detail, as I'm busy with life.
I imagine the general rule would be the most employers would probably cut ties upon dismissal.

However, Gina appears to be an exception to this.

If I recall from the OP, she has either tagged or mentioned past and present employers and people in her life in her social media posts. Tagging would alert them that Gina continues to mention them. And if anyone happens to check her social media, they can see anyone she mentions in her public posts.

Also, from the OP, she made a plea bargain where she pleaded guilty to attempted aggravated stalking. It wouldn't be unusual for whomever Gina was attempting to stalk to want to keep tabs on her to know if she's still obsessed with them or behaving in a way that her behavior towards or against them could escalate.
She used to have Twitter, but both of her accounts have disappeared. Along with almost all but 7 videos on YouTube being taken down on her channel.
She is not in control of her senses and her behavior.

This is about as funny as a kidney stone, high blood pressure or epilepsy.

Maybe law enforcement is not "enlightened" over there, but this woman's brain is diseased.

Just like end-stage kidney failure leads to death, end-stage brain failure ends in suicide, accidents, violence or dying of exposure to the elements.

I am surprised that Law Enforcement is not afraid of being sued if this woman wanders out into the cold and freezes to death. Or what if she finally gouges a child's eyes out, thinking he is the Christ child. Considering the abundance of calls that have come in...
I don't think the police there are incompetent per se, but more or less tired of her and/or focusing on actual police things. I'm not sure.

How about a shot of Benadryl and Ativan in the butt cheek, for starters.

I get that, how it is not illegal to be crazy. But if you are as crazy as she is, chances are, you are violating numerous ordinances.

They usually hold until you are deemed no longer a danger to self or others.

I am just having trouble understanding why a hallucinating, ranting and drooling menace seems to keep falling through the safety net.
Like keeping a needle from falling through the sewer drain or something.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Not sure what encouraged her to purge her youtube channel. It's strange that she said she has nothing but her welfare mobile data package and has no internet service yet has been using almost all the usual sites etc.
I was suspicious about that, too. But I suppose whatever broken old phone she has can use the data to use social medias. About YouTube, it could also be possible that someone saw her videos and reported them for some reason. Maybe, just maybe YouTube's reporting feature wasn't broken. Who knows. I no longer use Facebook, so I cannot keep tabs on if her pages/profiles are still active. Seems like everything's been wiped. She needs some serious help. I'm quite surprised she has not been homeless ever. Who would sell to this lady?
 
Seems like everything's been wiped. She needs some serious help. I'm quite surprised she has not been homeless ever. Who would sell to this lady?
She has also removed her instagram, but her blog is still up and I believe this is a new post. https://ginafournierauthor.com/white-boy-jesus-put-a-hatchet-in-your-pussy/

Gina's blog post powiedział(a):
There is a website called Kiwi Farms, which engages in human rights violations. I am a target.

I can't speak for anybody else on this website, but I feel nothing but sadness and remorse for what has happened to Gina. Her story is not remotely humorous. Even through her poeticism, there is truth in places that I think many can relate to (i.e. the cruelty and hypocrisy of the mental health system).
Incidentally, Gina, if you are reading this, there is nothing that Kiwi Farms can or will do to further harm you.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
... Kiwi Farms... further harm you.
Kiwi Farms has never at any point in time done a single thing to harm this woman.
We observe her through her own media which she willing and voluntarily put into the public realm to be observed.
She herself is her own worst enemy.

She is clearly schizophrenic with paranoia on the level of John Bulla. If she refuses to take the medications which would help her, then for the good of community, she should be permanently committed.
 
Kiwi Farms has never at any point in time done a single thing to harm this woman.
We observe her through her own media which she willing and voluntarily put into the public realm to be observed.
She herself is her own worst enemy.

She is clearly schizophrenic with paranoia on the level of John Bulla. If she refuses to take the medications which would help her, then for the good of community, she should be permanently committed.
I don't understand why you rated my post with 'disagree' when you essentially have said the same thing as me. I didn't say Kiwi Farms would harm her.
 
Sorry for late reply.

I assume she was teaching while not in a psychotic break?
If she was, we didn't know. She acted totally normal and just up and vanished one day.

What was the course?

English 112

@delta depression:

Does she rant in class like she does in her (now-deleted) videos?

Not at all she was very soft speaking and hippie like.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole