Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
It all reads like it was either 1. hastily thrown together without regard to accuracy, or 2. outright fabrication designed to sneak in just under the threshold, or both.
This is because Russhole is a complete liar, not even above forging documents completely (like the Hof letter).
 
This is because Russhole is a complete liar, not even above forging documents completely (like the Hof letter).
You're not thinking like Russ. He didn't forge it. They owed him that letter. He just took out a loan against it.

Winnemucca owed him a foreclosed property for a brothel.
Josh owes him a settlement.
he's owed numerous apartments.
His former employers owe him numerous ADA settlement and recommendation letters.
"America's Got Talent" owes him talent.
Taylor Swift owes him blowjobs and music royalties
His sister owes him a family
The Mormon church owes him rent.
God owes him a coke and a smile.

Just like Rekieta, he's just leveraging the debt equity he already has built up, not forging stuff.
 
You're not thinking like Russ. He didn't forge it. They owed him that letter. He just took out a loan against it.

Winnemucca owed him a foreclosed property for a brothel.
Josh owes him a settlement.
he's owed numerous apartments.
His former employers owe him numerous ADA settlement and recommendation letters.
"America's Got Talent" owes him talent.
Taylor Swift owes him blowjobs and music royalties
His sister owes him a family
The Mormon church owes him rent.
God owes him a coke and a smile.

Just like Rekieta, he's just leveraging the debt equity he already has built up, not forging stuff.
You forgot that Hardin owes him neutrality.
 
That's about as effective as rolling up a newspaper and booping the snoot of a puppy that's just left a gigantic dog's egg on the rug.
Disagree. The dog learns from it.

the amounts allocated to certain expense categories. It all reads like it was either 1. hastily thrown together without regard to accuracy, or 2. outright fabrication designed to sneak in just under the threshold, or both.
There's no way on God's green earth that this fucker has ever spent $100 a month on clothes and $50 on laundry and dry cleaning. We know he washes his suits in the bathtub.
I'm appalled to learn that IFP is awarded without recourse to pay stubs, tax returns and and bank statements. Many years ago a UK relative qualified for their equivalent (Legal Aid? Assistance?) and he had to turn in all of this and more, about the only thing they didn't demand was a bone marrow sample. He was on SSI/disability so had a very trackable income, god help anyone who didn't.
 
I'm appalled to learn that IFP is awarded without recourse to pay stubs, tax returns and and bank statements.
Tax returns and Paystubs don't mean shit, I could make $100k last year, lose my job and be absolutely broke this year

Bank statements are meaningless if you get paid in cash or check and use check cashing places.
 
Is there a estimate somewhere on how much fucking taxpayer money was spent on this shit by now?
I mean, I guess the bright side of the judges doing fuck and all with the case is that they've put near minimal billable hours into it. On the other hand, it'd be even fewer if they'd take any of the offramps that Hardin has given them.
 
And a corrupt bow-tied idiot doesn't even allow the other side to look at his perjury.
The corrupt bow tied idiot also said Rule 18 doesn't apply. Sure, Alphabet corporation is hosting and publishing the issue at hand. But we don't need to bring the party that is allegedly publishing the works at issue into a lawsuit about the published works, even though the entire lawsuit is about the works being published by Alphabet and not Lolcow. No. Lolcow is vicariously liable for Alphabet Corporations infringement. But somehow Alphabet corporation is not directly liable.

I would be fascinated to hear the explanation for this on appeal. How Lolcow is Vicariously liable for Alphabet corporations direct infringement, and yet Alphabet corporation does not need to answer to the direct infringement by their google drive subsidiary, that is central to Greers own claims of vicarious liability. that causes liability by a third party due to their actions. WILD. The Rule 18 denial really needs to be banged on about. The District of Utah held that that a defendant is vicariously liable in a case where the direct infringer is NOT liable. How the fuck does that work?

But I forget, the bow tied idiots never assumed their idiocy would be subject to appeal.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The corrupt bow tied idiot also said Rule 18 doesn't apply. Sure, Alphabet corporation is hosting and publishing the issue at hand. But we don't need to bring the party that is allegedly publishing the works at issue into a lawsuit about the published works, even though the entire lawsuit is about the works being published by Alphabet and not Lolcow. No. Lolcow is vicariously liable for Alphabet Corporations infringement. But somehow Alphabet corporation is not directly liable.

I would be fascinated to hear the explanation for this on appeal. How Lolcow is Vicariously liable for Alphabet corporations direct infringement, and yet Alphabet corporation does not need to answer to the direct infringement by their google drive subsidiary, that is central to Greers own claims of vicarious liability. that causes liability by a third party due to their actions. WILD. The Rule 18 denial really needs to be banged on about. The District of Utah held that that a defendant is vicariously liable in a case where the direct infringer is NOT liable. How the fuck does that work?

But I forget, the bow tied idiots never assumed their idiocy would be subject to appeal.
I mean...they'd have to know about it to be directly liable...
 
How Lolcow is Vicariously liable for Alphabet corporations direct infringement, and yet Alphabet corporation does not need to answer to the direct infringement by their google drive subsidiary, that is central to Greers own claims of vicarious liability. that causes liability by a third party due to their actions. WILD.
It's the same way Taylor Swift is liable for the actions of her agents (leading to Russell suing her instead of her agents).
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole