Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Twrx]

The specific landlord I'm thinking of not only cut immense slack on rent at a time I was in dire straits, but also was a dude who wrote cookbooks and would also bring over huge batches of his latest recipes. He would pretend it was asking for "opinions" but we both knew it was an incredible act of charity and he was just pretending to spare my dignity.

You also probably weren't routinely late, nor constantly plight sperging to dude all the time.

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

I think this passage from Chapter 1 of "Why I Sued Taylor Swift," which can be found included in ECF 415, is pretty relevant to what's going on now.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

I don't think it's possible for the Bowtie Morons to not concede that Hardin is completely correct in ECF 485 without actually reaching the threshold for removal from the bench.

It absolutely is, but as others have said, I think they're waiting for the 10th to give them a reason to dismiss with prejudice.

If you follow the District of Utah at all, many cases come out of there that in some way, shape, or form heavily favor LDS interests.

If you're interested, the Mormon Mafia are showing their ankles in the current Bricks and Minifigs case.

Hardin's recent filings are a joy to behold. It's just a shame the judges will never read them, they might learn something.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Time for some more Mormon sperging I PROMISE IS ON TOPIC THIS TIME!!!

Joseph Smith, as mayor of Nauvoo, infamously declared local newspaper the Nauvoo Expositor a "public nuisance" (for exposing polygamy) and had their printing press destroyed. This directly led to Joseph Smith's arrest and assassination in Carthage Jail.

Russell's use of the term "public nuisance" is invoking the death of Joseph Smith to send a coded message to the Mormon judges, "My cause is righteous as the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph Smith, kiwifarms is wicked as the Nauvoo Expositor. We Mormons destroyed the free press for our faith once, we can do it again."

 

[AnOminous]

Russell's use of the term "public nuisance" is invoking the death of Joseph Smith to send a coded message to the Mormon judges, "My cause is righteous as the martyrdom of the Prophet Joseph Smith, kiwifarms is wicked as the Nauvoo Expositor. We Mormons destroyed the free press for our faith once, we can do it again."

Isn't Russhole himself pretty much the definition of a public nuisance? Isn't he literally convicted of it?

You also probably weren't routinely late, nor constantly plight sperging to dude all the time.

Right, I always paid up. And he knew I would. And his dishes were always awesome.

 

[Sintharia]

ECF 481 as Images.

The entire argument here is effectively that case law is irrelevant because those cases are not THIS case. Absolutely insane. And it's horrible to realize that the judges are as likely to affirm Greer's argument as they are to deny it.

Wyświetl załącznik 9178432

Random.txt when?

 

[Null]

You were probably also an actual tenant, and not a guest who somehow inherited the place because the actual tenant left without paying.

NO ONE CARES!!!!!

do you guys need a sewing circle DM chain or something? what the fuck is this? this thread is 1700 fucking pages long, shut up, JESUS

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

A month ago he says:

is this a serious discussion? just don't fucking read it.

Now he says:

NO ONE CARES!!!!!

do you guys need a sewing circle DM chain or something? what the fuck is this? this thread is 1700 fucking pages long, shut up, JESUS

I'll end up with whiplash at this rate.

 

[Null]

A month ago he says:



Now he says:



I'll end up with whiplash at this rate.

dude it wouldn't be such a problem if it ever ended but it never ends, this conversation about landlords has been going on several days. i wish people could just mind themselves.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

dude it wouldn't be such a problem if it ever ended but it never ends, this conversation about landlords has been going on several days. i wish people could just mind themselves.

I am sure we will keep this in mind henceforth.

 

[AnOminous]

The entire argument here is effectively that case law is irrelevant because those cases are not THIS case. Absolutely insane. And it's horrible to realize that the judges are as likely to affirm Greer's argument as they are to deny it.

I have really low expectations of the Tenth Circus, but even so, I still expect somehow to be disappointed.

 

[Pee Cola]

I have really low expectations of the Tenth Circus, but even so, I still expect somehow to be disappointed.

If the defendant was anyone other than The Internet's Nigger™, the 10th would most likely take the L and accept SCOTUS' ruling.

Given the combination of Null's unique status and the the (((early life))) of at least one of the judges who handed down the original ruling, I expect the 10th to pull out some 6D chess moves to uphold their original ruling without attracting the wrath of SCOTUS.

 

[Your Girlfriend's Dad]

without attracting the wrath of SCOTUS.

That'll be pretty hard to do, considering it's going to go to SCOTUS if that decision is appealed, no?

 

[Pee Cola]

That'll be pretty hard to do, considering it's going to go to SCOTUS if that decision is appealed, no?

Not if the 10th uses its power of time travel to uphold its decision prior to Cox and Hikma, thus tricking SCOTUS into thinking that the citations in Hardin's filings are AI hallucinations.

Meanwhile, back in this marginally less ludicrous timeline, I could see the 10th upholding their decision and forcing Null to take the appeal all the way to SCOTUS, on account of the process being the punishment.

It's not like any of the judges would be risking their jobs over it. Realistically, even if SCOTUS expressed righteous indignation at how the 10th is going out of their way to obstruct natural justice, from what I can tell the worst thing that could realistically happen to the judges in question is censure. That's about as effective as rolling up a newspaper and booping the snoot of a puppy that's just left a gigantic dog's egg on the rug.

 

[The Garden]

ECF 486

Wyświetl załącznik 9179858

I would just like to point out that Gree listed 14 years of schooling in his IFP request. He either included everything other than elementary school, or he's saying he took 14 years to earn a 2 year "degree". Either way, he's telling the court from the word go that he is unbelievably stupid.

 

[AnOminous]

That'll be pretty hard to do, considering it's going to go to SCOTUS if that decision is appealed, no?

And they can simply decline to hear it last time, even though the original moronic Tenth Circus opinion was flatly in contradiction of existing law even at the time.

Odds are slightly better than last time, because two decisions came down unanimously in support of our general position and this specific case was cited by parties in both cases. Plus Null and Lolcow LLC were amici. It would almost be a provocation basically simply to disregard two unanimous and recent SCOTUS decisions while pretending they aren't. There's also the fact that the whole point of SCOTUS is to ensure some level of uniformity between federal courts. That said, despite having made very clear statements in Heller/McDonald (recognizing the Second Amendment as an actual fundamental right and not some abstract principle), they have more or less refused actually to enforce these opinions despite numerous states and even federal courts flagrantly ignoring them.

 

[DavidS877]

I would just like to point out that Gree listed 14 years of schooling in his IFP request. He either included everything other than elementary school, or he's saying he took 14 years to earn a 2 year "degree". Either way, he's telling the court from the word go that he is unbelievably stupid.

That seems like a normal number, 12 years as a child 1st through 12th and then a 2 year certification.

 

[The Garden]

That seems like a normal number, 12 years as a child 1st through 12th and then a 2 year certification.

Except it took him 5 years to get the 2 year degree. And I've never seen one of those questions include anything before high school graduation.

 

[Stella d'Oro]

He's also enrolled at UNLV, but I'm not sure if we found out how long he's been enrolled there. We know he's been in contact with some form of social services since moving to Nevada 6? years ago (assuming what he's stated in the Viatron lawsuit is true, big IF) so it's possible he enrolled in classes around the same time? There's no way he's taking a full course load so he could very well have been enrolled for 5/6 years and still hasn't earned his degree. Maybe if he spent his student loans on tuition instead of a car he could take more classes (again, assuming he's not lying).

This is why it's so important to unseal ECF 1. Every single one of his IFP applications is different and likely full of lies. The numbers make absolutely no sense to me, either. The perfectly round numbers (no hourly worker earns a perfectly round number) and the amounts allocated to certain expense categories. It all reads like it was either 1. hastily thrown together without regard to accuracy, or 2. outright fabrication designed to sneak in just under the threshold, or both.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He's also enrolled at UNLV, but I'm not sure if we found out how long he's been enrolled there.

Since Spring 2025

Apropos of nothing; a result came in for something I had someone look into.

Wyświetl załącznik 8484281