- Dołączono
- 28 Wrz 2021
What would you say is the true and honest Scientifically proven method of regime change?Perhaps, but to what end ?
History has proven that's not how regime change are done.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
What would you say is the true and honest Scientifically proven method of regime change?Perhaps, but to what end ?
History has proven that's not how regime change are done.
ESLThe deterioration of Donald Trump's public image is not primarily attributable to the Iran conflict or tariffs. Rather, it is due to his explicit admissions of aligning with Israeli interests. He does not appear to be the overarching authority in this matter. Furthermore, Benjamin Netanyahu has inflicted more damage on Trump's reputation than any revelations contained within the Jeffrey Epstein files. Trump looks like he taking order from Netanyahu. With everything else he cared about looking like he was In charge. Trump doesn’t look like he’s top dog right now.
I give this dude no more than two days to live.
the plot twist is, the person you're replying it is "just saying anything at this point"Let me be quite honest, i think he's just saying anything at this point. I seriously doubt he'll do anything. Or is this another baseless article like armageddon?
Bombings will continue until my boy DJT gets his Peace Prize.Perhaps, but to what end ?
You know it just feels like I've seen this movie before...By the end of this week, Iran won't have any missiles left. If we bomb Khamenei's son in funeral () plus this, i'd consider it victory.
You know it just feels like I've seen this movie before...
Well, seems like he did.Did Trump say he might have forced Israel's hand in striking Iran first?
"Why is it a problem that the insane death cult be allowed to have nukes?"Tehran vows to strike European countries if they join Iran war. These people are genuinely suicidal.
You must be thrilled to see your old unit being reactivated then.McNamara's Morons live on.
Iraqi freedom took a year and half and was able to utilize higher levels of existing regional deployments (due to commitments to SA & Kuwait to be ready to contain Saddam should he start shit).You'll know an American invasion is going to happen if & only if there are massive ground force movements toward Iran, similar to those preceding the invasion of Iraq - movements which would be impossible to hide, which would doubtless take more months, and which pointedly have not happened anytime during the buildup to this air campaign vs. Iran. (Keep in mind the Iraq invasion took nearly 500k US troops, and 2003 Iraq was significantly weaker than 1991 Iraq or - in theory, at least - 2026 Iran.) Until & unless that happens, you can safely chalk this one up to Democrat fearmongering.
There is no Russian equal. There is no equal, period. The Su-57 has the cross section of a leer jet and a massive IR tailpipe picture because Russia is having trouble producing an engine to the design specs. They thus have a temporary engine installed in all their Su-57s that requires a metal grating be installed over the intakes to direct airflow, cover the forward IR signature, and hold the engines in place because they aren't the same dimensions as the intended engine. This utterly wrecks the stealth geometry and radar returns.The only Russian equal would be an SU-57 of which they only have 30 non-prototypes.
From a guy who has flown with them:Japan and Korea are formidable on paper but have zero combat experience, same goes for China.
1) Not disputing the Su-34 is a decent performer; shitty Russian avionics asside its a very competent fighter-bomber.Russia has quite a few good aircraft. SU-34s hold only 1000 KG fewer than an F-15EX, 12k vs 13k, actually having a bomber fleet makes them one of two airforces on the earth with a track record of pulling off such operations. Most of the Sukhois can and have beaten up on aircraft they are supposed to beating up on, a Sukhoi has never been killed by anything other than another Sukhoi until the Indians ruined that record in their last spat with Pakistan. Russia's issue is that they don't produce anywhere near enough aircraft for overwhelming first strikes. They've been very casualty adverse over Ukraine, which isn't a bad thing, but it's largely motivated by only making 2 SU-34s a month, as much of their production capacity is spent keeping their current air fleet afloat.
there is no Kilo nuke sub. Kilos are D/E and lack the ability to have launch tubes. The best you have is the 636.3/Improved Kilo II, which has an lengthened upper forward torpedo room that can launch a specially-packaged Kalibr missile varient. There is no (official) nuke warhead for the Kalibr and given the tight clearances it'd be a hell of a job to develop one the Kilo could launch. They also cannot launch their Kalibers while fully submerged.According to Wikipdia only one of their 3 Kilo class subs is on patrol. The other 2 are in refit.
Did they sink the Russian built Kilo nuke sub?
Everyone is getting to kill a few final muslims before retirement.
tl;dr: they thought the Iraqi Shia terrorist orgs would do some performative launches and they wouldn't be a significant threat + gives the Iraqi government the opportunity to do something about it (yes yes I know, fucking lol. But you have to give them the opportunity). now anything launching missiles/drones and chewing up interceptors is a target.It's odd that these strikes only began 2 days after the Iraqi militias have been launching constant missiles & drones towards American bases, it seems linked to the fact that they're now also picking on the Kurds, which Trump wants to assist in overthrowing the regime.
This nigger should be hung for treason.Haven't had time to watch this shit minute by minute, but Hakeem Jeffries (sounds awful sand nigger-ish to me) is up there saying "Oh we're gonna vote to make em stop".
Wouldn't that make any Iranian regime resistance hold out all the fiercer, hoping the vote passes in their favor?
Its even better than that.My memory isn't great but IIRC the whole story goes that muhammad realized his wife was nowhere to be seen and panicked. Until he saw a guy riding a horse and behind him was aisha who was stranded and saved by the guy. let's say that it led to people making rumors that she fucked him since apparently the whole journey took a day before she arrived to where muhammad was. This unsurprisingly led to muhammad accusing her of adultery and distancing himself from her, only to "suddenly" get a revelation from allah That made it so that you needed four witnesses for adultery. And thus he reunited with her. you know, totally not him trying to pretend he didn't get cucked by a guy whose dick ACTUALLY WORKED.
Jesus christ. Fucking sand niggers destroy everything, including the F-15's perfect Air to Air record. It was already bad enough we had to caveat with "never shot down air to air" Now we have to add in some gay bullshit like "undefeated in air-to-air combat against an opponent (please don't ask about friendly fire)"Wyświetl załącznik 8649306
A Kuwati F/A-18 shot down the three F-15s. It's now the only fighter to ever shoot down a F-15.
The F-4 (and the unending service-life extending varients, it I think we got to H) was one of the world most numerous combat aircraft ever build with varients in service to most of the globe. Its very likely they were able to secure parts, and what parts they couldn't get on blackmarket deals.... it started design in the 50s, I would imagine Iran could make the parts even under sanctions.anyway the Shah managed to secure like 78 of these back in the day and SOMEHOW the Iranians have kept a handful of them combat worthy (as in they can carry combat loads and take off, not that they would win) and they are the ONLY nation left on earth that has such airframes in such condition and sadly they will likey end up like these absurdly beauitful f-4 phantoms and f-5 tigers that Israel also destroyed
that 50,000 are all POGs tho.The US has 50,000 troops and more forces and fighters entering the region.
We tried to arm the Kurds in Iraq AND Syria to we are convinced this meta will work eventually
The main thing I enjoy about the Trump admin is the blatant honesty about the fucked up shit. Sure it's not a great idea to fund terrorists, but at least he's honest about it.
Kurds were not the ones blowing up IEDs in Iraq. They were the opposite. The only time the US had problems with the Kurds is when we tried to keep them from genociding the Sunnis. When ISIS tried to enter Kurdistan they got utterly raped.The Kurds are worthless.
They may take an Iraqi-style deal where they get their own special Kurd area. I forget the details of the Iranian kurds and their ethnic interplay and how reasonable they are.All five are historically anti-monarchy and anti-Islamist secessionists.
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: DO NOT DO THIS UNLESS YOU WANT GOVERNMENT DOCTORS FINGERING YOUR ASSHOLE FOR 6+ MONTHS
@WiskeyJack has it covered.I have a theory on part of why Russia and Iran managed to function as paper tigers for so long.
It's the Pentagon's fault.
Exactly this. Wanton Sovietoid and Chicom cope is repeated like it resembles reality to make sure defense budgets are approved.I didn't realize people hadn't figured that out yet. I thought it was pretty well known we use rigged wargames to justify infinite R&D dollars for Raytheon.
Adding to this, the export F-16s usually have different avionics/radar/weapons integration packages for different countries, and sometimes different engines, but its the same airframe.The USAF/ANG's F-16s routinely get upgraded and updated through various service life extension programs to match the newest blocks being produced for export. The USAF announced a few years ago that the F-16 is going to stay in service until the damn 2040's. Do you think they're just going to keep flying them with the same engines, radars, and FCS in them from the 80s and 90s?
they have a hate boner for anyone who isn't the specific flavor of pedoworship they are and the right ancesories.Muzzies have a hateboner for literally everyone who is not them. It serves us to prop up Israel as a hate-sink for these neanderthals. Pay them to zip the Mohammedan savages, and we won't have to.
Its Vault 11 all over again.
Uhhh, this you nigga saying that Iran has aUhhh, this you nigga?
If they are flying those big bitches around then Iran really has zero control over their air. They are to big and slow to operate anywhere near contested air space.
Not wholly true. The US ran B-52s (and lost a number) over vietname and we didn't have supremacy just superiority. The B-52 operates at almost the edge of space, the distance involved means that only dedicated inceptor systems can actually reach it even if they can see it. The B-52 also usually carries counter measures and usually ECM pods.All you need to know is that they're big enough and slow enough that if they're running roughshod, it means saying we have total air superiority is an understatement.
Iran has allies who fit that description and might help. Just like Ukraine did. Are you going to sink a Russian supply convey crossing the Caspian after feeding Ukraine heavy weapons for four years? Putin's reasons for invading are identical: to stop state-sponsored terrorists (AZOV) killing Russian citizens. Agree or disagree it's just as valid as what's happening in Iran. It's a shame Trump didn't walk away from that one like he said he would. Then he'd have an argument.To be fair, Russia also has an actual aerospace industry that churns out big boy missiles by the hundred each month. They average shooting about 3-4 a day, slightly more now that they've gotten their production up to about 150 per month.
Iran does not have this luxury. All of their launchers are ground based. Russia could also lob missiles from behind total air supremacy over their homeland from aircraft. It's doubtful that Iran can fly any sorties without getting hunted down.
Russia ghosted them immediately as this started and has their own shit to worry about.Iran has allies who fit that description and might help.
Colored revolutions, but that didn't work out a few months ago. So its just drone rain until they all quit i guess.What would you say is the true and honest Scientifically proven method of regime change?
The goal is not democracy, it's to fuck with the Democrat's funding base and enact the Jew's fake Bibilical prophecies of Armageddon and Gog and Magog.btw someone remind me how did toppling Saddam go? is Iraq a bastion of peace now? The Kurds surely rose up and established a stable modern country yes?
Iran controls the striat of Hormuz! 20% global oil! Its over! Iran dominance forever.Our favorite C̶C̶P̶ ̶F̶u̶n̶d̶e̶d̶ ̶S̶h̶i̶l̶l̶ based truther has come out with a new video on the current conflict. He’s probably trying to make it look bad for the USA due to his vested interest and funding, plus trying to downplay or cover for the failure of the Chinese weapon systems.
Back in May of 2024 he predicted that the invasion would be done via a ground force by the USA, and it would fail immediately due to the home terrain advantage the Iranians have and hatred for the USA.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jIS2eB-rGv0
AHHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAIran has allies who fit that description and might help. Just like Ukraine did. Are you going to sink a Russian supply convey crossing the Caspian after feeding Ukraine heavy weapons for four years? Putin's reasons for invading are identical: to stop state-sponsored terrorists (AZOV) killing Russian citizens. Agree or disagree it's just as valid as what's happening in Iran. It's a shame Trump didn't walk away from that one like he said he would. Then he'd have an argument.
Colored revolutions, but that didn't work out a few months ago. So its just drone rain until they all quit i guess.
if you just keep bombing groups of prospective sand popes when they gather in high-profile public spaces, eventually they will A: stop trying to elect sand popes, or B: run out of sand popes to try to electPerhaps, but to what end ?
History has proven that's not how regime change are done.
I don't think people understand national elections in the United States. Moderates intentionally vote for whatever maintains the status quo regardless of anything going on. However, they also make sure to prevent 1 party from continuously winning elections and taking over. When a new president is getting elected after the 2nd term of the previous guy, moderates will elect the other party's guy and give that party control over the House and Senate. Then they moderate that party in the first midterm election by voting against it for Reps and Senators. Then they'll re-elect the same president to preserve the status quo and the cycle continues. Its all about preventing either party from having long-term dominance while also keeping the status quo going.If foreign policy affected elections, we would crown HW Bush as eternal president.
Tldr but you're wrong. The economy, stupid!I don't think people understand national elections in the United States. Moderates intentionally vote for whatever maintains the status quo regardless of anything going on. However, they also make sure to prevent 1 party from continuously winning elections and taking over. When a new president is getting elected after the 2nd term of the previous guy, moderates will elect the other party's guy and give that party control over the House and Senate. Then they moderate that party in the first midterm election by voting against it for Reps and Senators. Then they'll re-elect the same president to preserve the status quo and the cycle continues. Its all about preventing either party from having long-term dominance while also keeping the status quo going.
So George H. W. Bush was lucky to get elected due to non-moderate voters overpowering moderates but the moderates made sure he'd be 1-party president in order to stop the Republican party from staying in power much longer. They then replaced Clinton with GWB and replaced him with Obama. Its all about keeping everything in balance.
Bro worry about your cooking or something. The people begged us for help, Iran practically declared war on us in the 70s and we didn't do shit, we have a massive amount of bombs and weapons of war, and no plans on trying to turn Iran into the West. We can kill off the hardliners until they stop spawning and leave the rest to the iranian people and the Arab nations who are aligned with us. If it works great. If not oh well are military got some more experiencePerhaps, but to what end ?
History has proven that's not how regime change are done.