💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
They’re both bi. Or, more accurately, they simply want orifices to fill and be filled. They cannot think beyond the *zap* an orgasm or drug high gives them. They live for those lit-up synapses, whatever ones are left. It’s a fleshly pursuit and nothing more. They’re going to depend on their son and turn him into their minder and crutch, if he isn’t fully there already.

Nick and Kayla are stunningly unremarkable in every way. Low IQ, low impulse white trash behavior leaving a trail of broken children in their wake.

There’s nothing here worth an award.
 
I see the LOLCOW of the Year Award as quite similar to the Raspberry Awards(aka The Razzies).

That started off slow and gained increasing societal prominence and LOLCOW of the Year can follow a similar path, in my view.

This Award already dominates the sektur, as long as it can be pure and unvarnished by Jannie Insanity, the popularity of this Award will just increase year after year.

But it has to be treated the right way.
Take the path of least resistance and not care. It's just that simple. Everyone can see what's going on. Instead of causing a stint and alienating people we can just watch.

Seriously sometimes this thread exhibits the same DSP dentractor ways. Balldo's Gate was 100% right on this one.

If we sperg out, are we any better than those who still claim (as in they actually believe this, not tongue-and-cheek) the polls were rigged and timing and blah blah blah?
It's such an obvious case of whoever wins or loses, we win. Say the golden calf wins, who cares? Most would think he only won because the rules were changed, and he would win against who? Say he loses, who cares? The response is "tolja".
Now if we're going to act like petulant children and the child doser wins, it's once again janny interference. If he loses which I am 100% certain that he will, it's "even janny interference didn't get him to win".
For the first year, the golden calf honestly should have been in the new cow polls, like literally any other new cow. He would have dominated.

Once again it was the easiest to just include skelly for the last time and let him gracefully LOSE the three-peat because he's a washed child dosing faggot. Time to put this child dosing criminal down. I don't think I'll even vote for him. I'm voting for Maldavious Figtree.
The Gunt subforum didn't collectively seethe when a random nobody fat transvestite who was astroturfed by a brick-faced chinky tranny stole the title.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
How would he get into uni being home-schooled by Raketts. Unless he goes to Arizona State Uni or Dr Nick Riviera's Hollywood Upstairs Medical College

https://youtu.be/_c2LnVE2tWo

There are highschool transcripts from private school they attend and even in absence of that, standardised testing can substitute for diploma credentials in the United States, as I have been told by Americans who do micro-schooling.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
There are highschool transcripts from private school they attend and even in absence of that, standardised testing can substitute for diploma credentials in the United States, as I have been told by Americans who do micro-schooling.
But this is Cracketts. His kids will need 3 years of professional schooling just to unlearn all the bullshiat that came out of Nick and Kayla's mouths. Neither is equipped to teach anything.
 
Take the path of least resistance and not care. It's just that simple. Everyone can see what's going on. Instead of causing a stint and alienating people we can just watch.

Seriously sometimes this thread exhibits the same DSP dentractor ways. Balldo's Gate was 100% right on this one.

If we sperg out, are we any better than those who still claim (as in they actually believe this, not tongue-and-cheek) the polls were rigged and timing and blah blah blah?
It's such an obvious case of whoever wins or loses, we win. Say the golden calf wins, who cares? Most would think he only won because the rules were changed, and he would win against who? Say he loses, who cares? The response is "tolja".
Now if we're going to act like petulant children and the child doser wins, it's once again janny interference. If he loses which I am 100% certain that he will, it's "even janny interference didn't get him to win".
For the first year, the golden calf honestly should have been in the new cow polls, like literally any other new cow. He would have dominated.

Once again it was the easiest to just include skelly for the last time and let him gracefully LOSE the three-peat because he's a washed child dosing faggot. Time to put this child dosing criminal down. I don't think I'll even vote for him. I'm voting for Maldavious Figtree.
The Gunt subforum didn't collectively seethe when a random nobody fat transvestite who was astroturfed by a brick-faced chinky tranny stole the title.
I think LOLCOW of the Year is such a great idea, that I want it to be the best it can be.

To not defend the concept when it appears to being needlessly messed with, doesn't sit right with me.

If I didn't care about it, then obviously not saying anything about it would be easy.
 
But this is Cracketts. His kids will need 3 years of professional schooling just to unlearn all the bullshiat that came out of Nick and Kayla's mouths. Neither is equipped to teach anything.

Fortunately, children are generally resilient and capable of throwing off their parent's ideology (for good or ill). This is not to say that poor parents are not an obstacle to a successful life, but rather than outgrowth of parental constraints is a part of normal development on the way to independence. I would be more worried if their self-sufficiency were actively handicapped or sabotaged by the kind of 'parentification' evinced by the KCHCSS transcripts where the son was referenced in a supervisory role of parental drug use.

Lolcows especially seem to have rebellious children--Destiny is one that many would know, but there are others--so I have some hope, but in the end we have to watch and see.

Mum and Dad Rekieta seemed to have at least given Nick the opportunity to become independent by sending him to uni and law school, so hopefully the rest will also get that chance and be able to stand or fall on their own merits.
 
I'm used to this thread moving at 100 pages a day and somehow at less than 10 a day I am still getting the same information of his daily spiral looped endlessly in self medicated torment and cuckoldry.
Rekieta is hiding from the public as much as he can due to bad news. He is trying to work out how to spin, lie and deceive about it. When he re-emerges it could be an all time classic.
 
Pretty sure the kids' personal narrative of overcoming drug addicted, neglectful, chokeslamming parents, and one who was even dosed within said environment, will compensate in some ways the shitty academic record they'll have. It's all in how you sell yourself.
Packaging your childhood abuse and neglect to be part of how you market yourself is in itself fucked up and extends the trauma.

It sometimes takes my breath away how casually Nick and Kayla have taken the sacred responsibility of raising five innocent children. I pray Celeste Rekieta funds a generous trust to cover their future lifetime of therapy.
 
Packaging your childhood abuse and neglect to be part of how you market yourself is in itself fucked up and extends the trauma.
It's not fucked up. It's being transparent. If a college wants to know your backstory in an application you might as well play up the sympathy points as much as possible if you actually come from a background of hardship. I'm not saying they should tell this to everyone they meet.
 
It's not fucked up. It's being transparent. If a college wants to know your backstory in an application you might as well play up the sympathy points as much as possible if you actually come from a background of hardship. I'm not saying they should tell this to everyone they meet.
What I am telling you is that it’s not a harmless or wise course for the vast majority of people, especially kids or young adults whose brains are still developing. Disclosing traumatic experiences to random people with whom they have no established bond of trust is the fastest way for such a person to aggravate the existing trauma.
 
What I am telling you is that it’s not a harmless or wise course for the vast majority of people, especially kids or young adults whose brains are still developing. Disclosing traumatic experiences to random people with whom they have no established bond of trust is the fastest way for such a person to aggravate the existing trauma.
What's the alternative then? Getting college admission applications rejected because they were home schooled unless they have amazing SAT scores? And not disclose a history that any reasonably good background checker can uncover regardless given Nick is a public figure? If they play to the sympathetic tendencies of liberals towards disadvantaged people and that makes the difference for entrance into a good college then it makes that much easier for them to avoid or minimize contact with Nick for the rest of their lives. Seems like that'd be a good thing... Probably the only possible advantage because after college most employers won't give a shit about hardships.
Not to mention given the mid law school Nick went to, those kids probably aren't on track towards getting outstanding test scores so I don't see the advantage of keeping quiet about it on an application which while possibly not confidential isn't public information without request.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole