💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Listening to the MATI stream and Null talking about liars brains lighting up had me thinking.

Constant lying can be developed as a defense/survival mechanism in childhood, often in the face of abusive parents, having to keep them happy. This will extend into things like lying about performance at school and elsewhere.

Quite often, with intergenerational trauma, abuse is repeated from parent to child, creating a cycle that mostly goes unbroken.

In my specualted opinion, I imagine Nick is carrying out behaivours that are present in his parents, which would explain why some of Kaylas family were some of the people to report their behaivour.

Considering a lot of his energy is being focused on making his image look great in the midst of all this, I imagine his family has always had a level of having to have a certainimage. We know Nick became a lawyer because it'd make his grandad happy.

I strongly believe the reaction we're seeing from Nick currently, is due to how he's been brought up to manage his image when it comes to others crossed with a defence mechanism of lying that he developed to deal with some abuse that happened in his childhood.

The only thing I wonder is if his childhood lead to the development of a narcissistic personality or if it was there from the start.
 
You can hate someone to the core and still talk to them civilly
Practicing lawyers often do this. They can also actually like someone and still go balls to the wall murder monkey on them, then have a beer with them after they punch out for the day.
But I thought Barnes was just quasi famous for being Wesley Snipes' lawyer (Wesley Snipes lost, went to federal prison & lost every appeal).
He was guilty as sin and had zero chance of beating the misdemeanor charges but he won on the serious felony that could have sent him away for much, much longer.

Barnes actually did a good job on that and I'm not saying that because I like him, because I don't.
It was shown to be part of an art piece from the Master Bedroom.
Even if that's true, that's some edgyboi edgelord edge shit right there. Sounds like something you'd get at Hot Topic (where he got his gay belt).
These are just the lyrics of Marilyn Manson's Irresponsible Hate Anthem

And it's still kino.
Not many people have written a line on the level of "I wasn't born with enough middle fingers."
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
BTW, am I just crazy, or did the Balldoguards in Sean's chat the other night seem more organized than usual?

Between things like that, and the all the people alleging that this is some grand government conspiracy (which Null is dutifully compiling a record of), it seems to me he's leaning heavily on sycophantic weirdos to get "the message" out.

I guess it would make sense, given the government is watching him closer than anybody. An attempt at plausible deniability, and all that. It's kinda funny though.

Is he though? I guess on Rumble .. for whatever that's worth. But I thought Barnes was just quasi famous for being Wesley Snipes' lawyer (Wesley Snipes lost, went to federal prison & lost every appeal). Didn't know Barnes did much else except ambulance chase politicians on trial.
It seems to me he's at least about as popular as Nick was, at Nick's peak. Viva too.

I think it's just one of those things where they say things people want to hear. Government bad, etc.

Catching up on MATI from yesterday.

and the "You have a(n) _____ Avatar" shit is such a fucking faggot way of dealing with something someone says.
It's not even true in the vast majority of cases.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Working on a way to archive them, but Nick clicked ❤️ on a handful of Instagram comments speculating there was some wrongdoing by the police.
That last screencap is such damning evidence for rumor mongering.... "I haven't said anything publicly, but I have talked to people privately, and I suggest you talk to them" and then those people suggest corruption and conspiracy....
 
That last screencap is such damning evidence for rumor mongering.... "I haven't said anything publicly, but I have talked to people privately, and I suggest you talk to them" and then those people suggest corruption and conspiracy....
He explicitly said in the Interview with Chrissie "Go watch Barnes."

There is a narrative he wants people to believe but, in most cases, he doesn't want to tell it himself.
 
Maybe late, but this is another clip of barnes explicitly talking about how the search warrant substantiated him in claiming that Nick's situation was caused by political corruption, personal motivations and "first amendment retaliation animus". He also implies that an honest judge would have never signed the warrant. Which would all further support the idea that the search is a matter of public interest.

 
In my specualted opinion, I imagine Nick is carrying out behaivours that are present in his parents, which would explain why some of Kaylas family were some of the people to report their behaivour.

Nick's parents are weirdos at the very least. They claimed that Nick and Kayla were not on any drugs at all, making it kind of hard to take literally anything they say seriously. There's something not quite right going on there, but I have no idea what it is.
 
It seems to me if a reasonable trained law enforcement officer saw that stream, including the way Nick was acting, and with white powder on Nick's nose, they would conclude there is likely coke in that house and he is on it. A judge would feel similarly.
I doubt there's good case law out there, but it's not really a strong argument that it being a livestream makes it unique. If a police officer were watching a house from a public street, saw someone walk out in public view acting erratically, could hear them speaking erratically, and saw them with suspicious residue on their nose, that could be combined with other observations and investigations to add up to probable cause. How is watching the livestream any different than watching someone on a public street? Absent digital manipulation, which nobody has claimed, it's just a non sequitur designed to appeal to people who don't know enough about the topic to think deeply.
 
Maybe late, but this is another clip of barnes explicitly talking about how the search warrant substantiated him in claiming that Nick's situation was caused by political corruption, personal motivations and "first amendment retaliation animus". He also implies that an honest judge would have never signed the warrant. Which would all further support the idea that the search is a matter of public interest.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=UEHqZJqHBeA:1073
And this fat puffed-up bullfrog based that on including the deranged cokestream, because apparently ducking out on stream, returning with a white powder obviously on your nose and raving and screaming like a lunatic, with strange new energy, is total First Amendment activity, not obvious cocaine abuse.

And even if you entirely excised the cokestream part of the affidavit, there would already have been probable cause, from the information from mandatory reporters from multiple sources that Nick was dropping off his keeeeeds filthy, stinking, in unwashed clothes, hungry, and begging for food, while appearing to be under the influence.
 
Gnomestar should get niggercrater on lolcowlive. Imagine boogie and Nick bullshitting each other for two hours
 
Screenshot_20240810_115509_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20240530_122333_Brave.jpg
Oui oui, we.

I know I'm a few days late.
 
If a police officer were watching a house from a public street, saw someone walk out in public view acting erratically, could hear them speaking erratically, and saw them with suspicious residue on their nose, that could be combined with other observations and investigations to add up to probable cause.
It was. The cokestrem wasn't the only thing they relied on. The warrant application makes clear they came at this from multiple angles. Particularly the observations of staff at Nick's old church.

However, I really think the cokestream might have been enough in-and-of itself. It was that blatant.

Barnes is full of shit. I don't think he's stupid so much as I think he's willfully dishonest.

He was guilty as sin and had zero chance of beating the misdemeanor charges but he won on the serious felony that could have sent him away for much, much longer.

Barnes actually did a good job on that and I'm not saying that because I like him, because I don't.
Yeah, until you get to the part where Barnes (according to himself) bailed on Snipes because he didn't want to be associated with the sentence handed down for the misdemeanor convictions. @Musashi's Son pointed that out from this Hollywood Reporter article.


Maybe Snipes was dumb, but because of things like that I don't think Barnes cares as much about representing his clients as he cares about his reputation. That doesn't bode well for Nick.
 
I might have some questions about warrant and process if the house was more spotless than operating room and there was no drugs at all including alcohol in the house... But the totality and findings... Even if it was slightly wrong it is mandatory step to fight it to some level, but arguing that you could win is insanity...
 
Yeah, until you get to the part where Barnes (according to himself) bailed on Snipes because he didn't want to be associated with the sentence handed down for the misdemeanor convictions. @Musashi's Son pointed that out from this Hollywood Reporter article.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ho...ws/fired-wesley-snipes-lawyers-big-62843/amp/
I also have criticized his conduct after the case. Repeatedly. I do not believe a lawyer should trash-talk a client after the fact even when it does not directly violate ethical rules.

I'm just saying he actually did do a good job at the trial phase.
 
Rekieta is fine with challenging and talking about the drug thing and the bodycam footage etc. but has anybody confronted him on livestream about letting Aaron have sex multiple times with his WIFE ? That's the one thing I have not heard him talk about yet, I would like to hear if there is some CRAZY story how that actually did not happen at all
 
I might have some questions about warrant and process if the house was more spotless than operating room and there was no drugs at all including alcohol in the house... But the totality and findings... Even if it was slightly wrong it is mandatory step to fight it to some level, but arguing that you could win is insanity...
Ya think?

It's an uphill battle to argue there existed no probable cause when the cops find the very items that they were looking to find as described in the warrant.

What? Did they just make a super fucking lucky guess there was dope at Casa de Balldo?

Rekieta is fine with challenging and talking about the drug thing and the bodycam footage etc. but has anybody confronted him on livestream about letting Aaron have sex multiple times with his WIFE ?
He's just gonna lie and claim the only people they sleep with are each other.

It's pointless.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole