💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.
He likes to say that you should go through the warrant and see how each fact runs into the next. Paired with the talk during the Barnes stream about how investigators/government officials will work to get information without having it go into the discoverable record, Nick might believe the government is withholding pieces of information that were used in the warrant because he doesn't see how they got from step 1 to step 2 without supplemental information.
 
He likes to say that you should go through the warrant and see how each fact runs into the next. Paired with the talk during the Barnes stream about how investigators/government officials will work to get information without having it go into the discoverable record, Nick might believe the government is withholding pieces of information that were used in the warrant because he doesn't see how they got from step 1 to step 2 without supplemental information.
It's gibberish though. That isn't how probable cause works. You just need enough that the judge can determine that it is likely that a search will reveal evidence of a crime. While the facial validity is not determined by whether the search actually did reveal evidence of a crime, well, look at it, they found a fuckton of cocaine, shocking absolutely nobody.

They don't have to lay out their entire case in the search warrant, and it would be absolutely stupid to do that anyway.

Barnes is a fucking idiot.
 
This cunt has done the "Dear John" stream where he betrayed a confidence for literally no reason other than he was assblasted, and now he's done the same with Jersh, but in an extremely bizarre way where he himself was the one doing the "shower call" and somehow thinks disclosing the DMs that completely confirm Jersh's summary of them is an own. I'm completely baffled at what logic made this coke-addled faggot think that was somehow a win.
The DMs reminded me of the old "I AM SILLY" meme:
1b4.png

Only with Balldo having unhinged walls of text and Josh having the rational, succinct replies. I hope for his sake he's not sober, since if this is his baseline, he's well and truly fucked his brain permanently.

It was hilarious when he was complaining the Josh was being "myopic" and didn't think about how other people perceive things, while using weasel wording and trying to shift blame in real time. Narcissistic bullshit completely fails when receipts exist.
 
Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.
You are right they presented a load of nonsense. No use for getting the warrant thrown out or Reiketa's case.

It will be sweet if it is actually useful as evidence that a 'respected' lawyer with an audience was spreading rumours about corruption around the search that were seen by another lawyer and repeated as valid.
 
Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face?
Sorta, and weakly. Barnes opined at one point that you can't establish probable cause based on law enforcement monitoring of a livestream. In this case, the cokestream.

Which I am pretty sure is absolute bullshit. He cited absolutely no case law in support of that position. I don't see how "Internet surveillance" would be much different than physical surveillance.

It seems to me if a reasonable trained law enforcement officer saw that stream, including the way Nick was acting, and with white powder on Nick's nose, they would conclude there is likely coke in that house and he is on it. A judge would feel similarly.

And indeed there was fucking coke in that house.

At the end of the day though...

That's just hand-wavy defense lawyer bullshit to take your mind off the pile of cocaine they found in his bedroom.
Correct.

Barnes has bad facts, so he's gonna make up bullshit law.

And people who don't know any better will believe it because "he's a lawyer."
 
Which I am pretty sure is absolute bullshit. He cited absolutely no case law in support of that position. I don't see how "Internet surveillance" would be much different than physical surveillance.
There's actually a pretty big difference, in that you generally actually need probable cause even to engage in physical surveillance.

If some stupid motherfucker is publicly broadcasting their own criminal behavior, like Nick was, ANYONE can watch it, with or without cause.

Fun fact: even the police are allowed to watch YouTube.

Also there's the fact they ALREADY had probable cause even before the deranged cokestream. The cokestream was just lagniappe.
 
This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.
Okay, points for unironically using foppish popinjay in a sentence. I've been looking my whole adult life for just such an opportunity, but it's never worked out.

"What did you call me?"
"Foppish popinjay. I called you a foppish popinjay. It felt right at the time. I mean, look at you. Who wears their hair in a pompadour nowadays? And what's with the purple-blue tuxedo with the frilly cummerbund? I haven't seen one of those since prom night 1979. And those shoes, man. Don't even get me started on the shoes."
"The gauntlet is thrown, sir. You are no gentleman. I shall see in you in the field."
"Whatevs, man. Whatevs..."
 
There's actually a pretty big difference, in that you generally actually need probable cause even to engage in physical surveillance.
I'm talking about passive surveillance. A cop can watch you on a public street without a warrant. A cop can watch you on a public livestream without a warrant. Neither is like phone tapping, or otherwise invasive surveillance.

Nick was so brazen in his behavior, they didn't need a warrant to gather together the evidence that established the probable cause the nigger has coke. They only needed the warrant at the very end to go get that coke and arrest his dumb ass.

And they did.
 
It doesn't have to be a direct statement, it just has to be a rumor that exists. Chrissy obviously seems under the impression that the evidence may be planted.

Someone else sent another clip from the Chrissy video I've added.

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.
Camelot. Starts with alleging government only looking for W.

Rekieta then describes in detail the plan to get his kids back (what he claimed he didn't know).

Here he admits that he talks shit about police/prosecutors
 
Balldo having unhinged walls of text and Josh having the rational, succinct replies.
Imagine being a fully grown adult and being unable to have an adult conversation that doesn’t make you look like a manipulative sociopath, Nick’s parents likely fell for this charade countless times, mommy and daddy always ready to help their piece of shit kid out of messes he himself got into.
You can hate someone to the core and still talk to them civilly
 
Then the hotel suit with that couple I assume it was aaron and april. Then he took a limo to his own event and was clearly high and wanted to take off his shirt.
A few corrections or at least notes, all from Camelot331 on stream:
  • Nick and Kayla stayed in a suite with Camelot, at least for the first part of the Vegas trip. I don't know if they were there the whole time.
  • If Nick and Kayla stayed with anyone else (besides Camelot and the hookers), I don't believe that's been documented. They did have multiple people over at the "Playboy" Airbnb in Nashville, including at least Branca and Valhalla the jannie.
  • It was on this Vegas trip Camelot learned of Nick's five figure ($20k?) / month coke habit.
  • Nick and Camelot also went out to pick up prostitutes.
  • Not from Camelot but notes on timeline: the Vegas trip predated the Qover. Vegas trip was March '23, Nashville either August or September. The qomedy show that launched the qover was in October of that year. Aaron and April didn't meet the Rekieta junkies irl until the comedy show.

I was sharing a suite with Coomy for 1-2 nights, then he got his own place.

The Playboy AirBnB was in Nashville and he had Branca and ValhallaAwaits there for a party with others (for whom he did a pole dance) over. Unclear if they stayed the night...

I've always assumed somebody confused .22 with .223 or wrote/read something wrong on a report. An AR-15 fires .223 (5.56NATO). The bullet diameters are the same but the .223 cartridge is much longer/powerful for those who don't know.

It was shown to be part of an art piece from the Master Bedroom.

Okay, so I've got three big things so far. Keep in mind I am specifically exploring rumors regarding activity of the police officers which could be clarified by bodycam footage.
  • Yellow Flashs's messages where he denies owning a .22 firearm,.
  • Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
  • Chrissy Mayr's clip where Rekieta says "you don't know what a cop brings into your house either", then backtracks it on confrontation.
Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?

Sweep and the other CPS agent (Emily something) arrived after the warrant was executed and the home breached to help place the children. Sweep's testimony is that she arrived somewhere in the middle of the police search as they were 'locating and opening safes'.

Mine is his ass with the bottle sticking out of it.

I can understand why he might not appreciate that, but calling it loli would be a weird cope.

I think it is a paedo-adjacent slur that he has picked up.

Mine is Japanese, but that is as close as it gets...
 
Imagine being a fully grown adult and being unable to have an adult conversation that doesn’t make you look like a manipulative sociopath, Nick’s parents likely fell for this charade countless times, mommy and daddy always ready to help their piece of shit kid out of messes he himself got into.
You can hate someone to the core and still talk to them civilly
Forget about manipulative sociopath, how about just not looking like a scorned ex girlfriend trying to explain why it's your fault she can't talk to you, meanwhile incessantly talking to you.
This smug little faggot typed paragraph after paragraph of repetitive attempts to insult & goes onto complain about being summarized. It's for the brevity, Cracket. Because you talk too much and say little or nothing.

I still don't understand how Barnes became so trusted and respected.
Is he though? I guess on Rumble .. for whatever that's worth. But I thought Barnes was just quasi famous for being Wesley Snipes' lawyer (Wesley Snipes lost, went to federal prison & lost every appeal). Didn't know Barnes did much else except ambulance chase politicians on trial.
 
There is nothing I would like more than for everyone in this thread to be 100% wrong and for Nick to simply be going through a rough patch from which he bounces back and starts acting sane and stable again. He really did bring something of value back in the day and it's a crying shame that he ruined it the way he did. I'm not going to say it's impossible for this entire thing to be a wake up call for him(losing custody of his kids reminds him not to take them for granted and to actually take care of them) but at this point I think the common sentiment is that we'll believe it when we see it.
I still rewatch some of his old streams. He was great back in the day. He needs to repent tho and turn away from his sin for anything truly good to happen for him.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole