- Dołączono
- 4 Lip 2024
this archive, which is linked in the op, no longer existsArchive of this morning’s catastrophe can be found here:
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
this archive, which is linked in the op, no longer existsArchive of this morning’s catastrophe can be found here:
Delusions of grandeur?What's the inverse of impostor syndrome?
Such an effective graphic it even works on ODD maniacs.skull and bones means don't ingest.
They told me they did it, they told me it was gone, those hoes were holding out on me!Nick just implied he didn't know the coke was in his house.
Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.He's exactly the kind of shit-for-brains who tries to insist on an Alford. I hope the prosecution refuses any deal that doesn't involve admission of guilt.
"Possession crimes require the intent to possess the drug"
I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.
He's only a slightly more practicing lawyer than Rekieta so I would take his legal opinions with only a mildly smaller boulder of salt than Rekieta's.I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.
Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.
Pretty easy to demonstrate if he'd just consent to it's release.Nick says that @Null is being lied to about the bodycam footage. Let's see how this ages:
6229291-798f9c66ac706627e22b6d3a1fbd617b.mov
It's one thing him and Boogie have in common... neither of them can tell the truth about anything, ever.He's flat out lying. Lying to you face.
Got you coveredI would like to put in a request with management of this forum to add Mrs. Chrissie Mayr to the list of Noseguards and Balldo(tm) washers list. I personally feel she has finally earned it.
For a so-called lawyer, he sure seems to lack all the brains of one. Every single thing he says and does, are quite the opposite of what a real lawyer would do.Balldo is acting exactly like an angry seething cuck thats guilty as sin would do.
Hey Andrew, I challenge you to go over how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea.I remember LEGUL MINDSET talking about how Nick torched any chance he had at an Alford plea. I'll try and find it.
I appreciate you and your services.Got you covered
"I didn't say that."Nick just implied he didn't know the coke was in his house. He's really going to try and pin this all on someone else.
EDIT:
nick-chrissie-1.mp4
Rando law firm Google result:Is an Alford plea allowed in MN? I'm also sure CPS will not look kindly on an Alford/no contest plea.
I think Nick might be better off with the other kind of plea mentioned in this snippet.In Minnesota, an Alford plea is designed to allow somebody charged with a crime to plead guilty to the charge but at the same time allows that person to actually deny that they committed the crime. At the same time, the Defendant must also acknowledge that they recognize that the Government likely has sufficient evidence to get a conviction based upon that evidence if the case went to trial. However, it is important to remember that it is still a conviction. This is different than a Norgaard plea, which we have written about previously, in which a Defendant pleads guilty does not claim innocence but simply can’t remember what happened because they were drunk, high, or had some trauma or amnesia so that can’t remember the events.
Come to think of it, even the law firm article reads like it was written by an AI and perhaps was, but it's right despite its shoddy language.Does the Constitution require judges to refuse to accept Alford pleas?
The Constitution never allows a judge to accept an Alford plea. The defense of insanity is successful in a majority of cases where the defendant uses such a defense. The rules of evidence always apply.
Hes has never liedHe's flat out lying. Lying to you face.
Dan Mullen - allegedly taking the same “kids can take care of themselves” stance. will need to verify
He's so fucking cooked holy shit!a "battle of the experts" over the efficacy of hair follicle testing in and of itself.