SD Teachers "Dash for Cash" for spending money on classroom supplies

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Luckily for the kids Tom is the child molester equivalent of a bottom feeder, not a predator.

Who knows how many kids have been saved by his incompetence and laziness.
Yeah, I don’t believe he’s an immediate threat, for the simple reason that child molesters rely on power and trust. You just have to look at this goggle-eyed loon to know that there’s something up with him. No child is going to trust this bizarre-looking, stinking old man and no parent would leave their kids with him.
 
Reminder that Tom has advocated for trans kids to have unsupervised visits with "trans elders" in the community and that schools should facilitate this.

This, as part of his campaign to get age of consent laws lowered... Because somehow, according to Tom, that "helps" LGTBQ teenagers from "unsupportive" families.

How it "helps" them other than by helping predators recruit them into sex-work, I'm not sure.
 
This, as part of his campaign to get age of consent laws lowered... Because somehow, according to Tom, that "helps" LGTBQ teenagers from "unsupportive" families.

How it "helps" them other than by helping predators recruit them into sex-work, I'm not sure.
I don't know, Buck. I hear it's lucrative. Clearly it's helping them get their best foot forward financially in this cruel, cold, cishet world. Don't deny them that. Don't be a bigot.
 
Nothing predatory about that at all, no sir....



Says the self confessed garbage eating, dog molesting pedophile who says he’s a woman
Luckily for the kids Tom is the child molester equivalent of a bottom feeder, not a predator.

Who knows how many kids have been saved by his incompetence and laziness.
I don't know, Buck. I hear it's lucrative. Clearly it's helping them get their best foot forward financially in this cruel, cold, cishet world. Don't deny them that. Don't be a bigot.
This, as part of his campaign to get age of consent laws lowered... Because somehow, according to Tom, that "helps" LGTBQ teenagers from "unsupportive" families.

How it "helps" them other than by helping predators recruit them into sex-work, I'm not sure.

Nothing true about any of that shit either. It's just more delusional blather from a toilet full of toxic transphobic talking turds. More stupid please, fan boys.
 
Oh that’s interesting. So what is your actual reason for wanting to lower the age of consent?
I have given it to you three times; ancient cultural norms, current cultural norms and to enable gender non-conforming teens the ability to get emancipated from abusive families before they're driven to suicide.
You're really gross, man. Oh, and racist. And misogynistic. Hmmm... and perverted, obscene, dense, unscrupulous, delusional, retarded, pedophilic, and finally self absorbed.
Please let it be noted that the statement you describe as that is a line that came out of your broken brain, fan boy.
 
... enable gender non-conforming teens the ability to get emancipated from abusive families before they're driven to suicide.

I literally just listed this as one of his [decidedly twisted] reasons for championing lowering age of consent laws; in response he claims there was "nothing true" about my comment, then he comes back and says the exact same thing he'd just said wasn't true.

I don't know what's beyond "out of touch with reality", but whatever it is, he's on his way - if not already there.

It bears pointing out - again - that the irredeemable mental defective has been told numerous times by @Tragi-Chan et al that "age of consent" laws have nothing whatsoever to do with contracts and that, as I told him, legal "emancipation" does not mean that a minor can "consent" to otherwise illegal activity - like engaging in sexual acts with adults - outside of CA's peculiar minor-marriage statute.
 
Nothing true about any of that shit either. It's just more delusional blather from a toilet full of toxic transphobic talking turds. More stupid please, fan boys.
I mean, yeah, our sources are filled with delusional blather. They’re from the videos you make. The reason we call you a delusional, dirty, dog molesting pedo is because you, yourself, have told us that in your videos. Do you need us to look those videos up and post them here?
 
Nothing true about any of that shit either. It's just more delusional blather from a toilet full of toxic transphobic talking turds. More stupid please, fan boys.
That's very aggressive, Miss Tommie. Not warranted either. I'm obviously not one of those damn dirty trolls, I'm just trying to understand, if only you'd explain. Where exactly are people getting these ideas? I'd also like to know your personal thoughts on this subject, since the ones I've been catching wind of are clearly incorrect.
 
I have given it to you three times; ancient cultural norms, current cultural norms and to enable gender non-conforming teens the ability to get emancipated from abusive families before they're driven to suicide.
No, you just said that emancipation of gender non-conforming teens wasn’t the reason. Make up your mind.

However, the fact that you remember telling me this three times is also interesting. Because you often change your story and I’ve given you the benefit of the doubt because I assumed your memory wasn’t so good. Now it seems that you were just being dishonest.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I have given it to you three times; ancient cultural norms, current cultural norms and to enable gender non-conforming teens the ability to get emancipated from abusive families before they're driven to suicide.

Please let it be noted that the statement you describe as that is a line that came out of your broken brain, fan boy.
Why would a child emancipated from an abusive household need to have sex with an adult? What possible benefit--individual or societal--would result from that?

The child could find other children to have sex with if they really need to have sex (they don't). You want the most vulnerable of children to be preyed on by the worst adults..and you want it legal.

Gross.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole