WaveMeltzer
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 6 Lip 2022
Looks like the wax is on the other ball, Johnny
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
He's been threatening & trying to top himself since 2019 that I know of, he must be on his millionth attempt by now.Does anyone know whether his twitter was A) permanently disabled, B) temporarily suspended or C) self-suspended? Maybe this troon will finally succeed on their self-alleged "multiple attempts at suicide?"
Even a failure at suicideHe's been threatening & trying to top himself since 2019 that I know of, he must be on his millionth attempt by now.
Obviously "practice makes perfect" bypassed him as he's still here.
100% this. Trannies will get more upset that a literal child rapist pedophile is misgendered than the fact that a pedophile was raping children.Malicious compliance. People who don't want to acknowledge the boogeytrans incarnate that is Jon can't point to any wrong pronouns as an easy excuse to dismiss the veracity or significance of what's been said. Because to the gender fandom, it's a greater offense to misgender creeps than to be one. (Plenty of them will be upset anyway that previous versions of his name are mentioned, even though it's done in a factual manner referring back to earlier cases.) I think there's a trans-compliant version of MM for this reason.
This is because legalizing pedophilia is a prime directive of the LGBTQ+8======D movement.100% this. Trannies will get more upset that a literal child rapist pedophile is misgendered than the fact that a pedophile was raping children.
It's that exact behaviour that chafes my ballsack with these fucks. Anyone who defends a pedo in any way deserves the rope I don't care who you are. If you rape and molest then you no longer get any rights, except the right to a bullet in the brain pan. I know WHY they do this bollocks, however I sometimes can't believe that out of all these terminally online troons not one has the sense to say "Hmm maybe simping for pedos and rapists is bad optics?" yet the cunts just double down if they get challenged on it.100% this. Trannies will get more upset that a literal child rapist pedophile is misgendered than the fact that a pedophile was raping children.
Mob mentality is a hell of a thing. If you get as far into a group identity as the average terminally online twitter troon is, it becomes virtually impossible to distinguish yourself from your worst peers and so you block out all evidence to the contrary and pretend everyone is 100% goldenI know WHY they do this bollocks, however I sometimes can't believe that out of all these terminally online troons not one has the sense to say "Hmm maybe simping for pedos and rapists is bad optics?" yet the cunts just double down if they get challenged on it.
It only seems that the "trans label" only exists to defend these sick fucks from criticism.Mob mentality is a hell of a thing. If you get as far into a group identity as the average terminally online twitter troon is, it becomes virtually impossible to distinguish yourself from your worst peers and so you block out all evidence to the contrary and pretend everyone is 100% golden
I've started to notice that there are a lot of these groups around these days. I don't know if they're more prevalent or I just hadn't noticed them before, either way it's amazing to see how in denial a person can actually be.Mob mentality is a hell of a thing. If you get as far into a group identity as the average terminally online twitter troon is, it becomes virtually impossible to distinguish yourself from your worst peers and so you block out all evidence to the contrary and pretend everyone is 100% golden
It's the core motivation of identity politics (besides being a never-ending wedge to keep the population fighting itself rather than the elites causing all the real problems). If you're part of a disadvantaged group, you cannot be criticized since you have a built-in excuse. Said disadvantage can be completely self-imposed, completely your own fault, or completely imaginary. You just have to claim it causes you difficulty somehow and that other people are somehow aware of it, capable of fucking with you with it and willing to do so.I've started to notice that there are a lot of these groups around these days. I don't know if they're more prevalent or I just hadn't noticed them before, either way it's amazing to see how in denial a person can actually be.
Aye it's become really noticeable since Trump won in 2016 though I know it's been a "thing" much longer than that. Trump winning seemed to flick a switch for a lot of people, which said you can scream, curse and wish death on anyone who doesn't agree with you. Troons are the undisputed champions of this sort of behaviour as this very thread shows, but you see it every where now to the point that the average man on the street will tell you to die in a fire if you disagree with them on the tiniest of issues.It's the core motivation of identity politics (besides being a never-ending wedge to keep the population fighting itself rather than the elites causing all the real problems). If you're part of a disadvantaged group, you cannot be criticized since you have a built-in excuse. Said disadvantage can be completely self-imposed, completely your own fault, or completely imaginary. You just have to claim it causes you difficulty somehow and that other people are somehow aware of it, capable of fucking with you with it and willing to do so.
The important part is joining (or forming) a group focused on the "disadvantage." The whole scam only works when there's a group of people you can get together to scream at somebody in unison. Nobody's afraid of one crank shouting at them. They'll just be ignored and chased out of the shop. It's harder to ignore a dozen idiots all yelling at you at once.
Agreed, along with the Trump part. It was the rise of social media also IMHO. Whereas a town may have their local weirdo, all those weirdos became able to talk with each other & organize. No longer were they alone. That's pretty much jonny's MO. He worked to get troons worldwide to support him in the beginning.Aye it's become really noticeable since Trump won in 2016 though I know it's been a "thing" much longer than that. Trump winning seemed to flick a switch for a lot of people, which said you can scream, curse and wish death on anyone who doesn't agree with you. Troons are the undisputed champions of this sort of behaviour as this very thread shows, but you see it every where now to the point that the average man on the street will tell you to die in a fire if you disagree with them on the tiniest of issues.
Humans have always been excellent at othering other groups of humans, I mean it's how we've survived this long as a species. This behaviour been kicked into overdrive though that you don't have localised groups any more. It's now on such a massive scale that shit is hitting the fan big time. It's why there are riots breaking out what seems like every other day. Then again maybe I'm talking out my arse but it's the way it looks to me.
Social media is a blight on this earth. I remember seeing or hearing a joke someone made about how back in the old days if someone said they wanted to fuck a toaster then they'd get mocked relentlessly and then given medical intervention, now though they just go on line and instantly find all the other mentally ill toaster fuckers out there. I think it describes how troons operate pretty well.Agreed, along with the Trump part. It was the rise of social media also IMHO. Whereas a town may have their local weirdo, all those weirdos became able to talk with each other & organize. No longer were they alone. That's pretty much jonny's MO. He worked to get troons worldwide to support him in the beginning.
The same applies to blm & the like.
I'm not gonna get into conspiracies, NWO & such. I do wonder if it's being guided by the media to cash in on it?
In going above and beyond, the judge is trying to tell Jonathan why these type of lawsuits of his lacks merit and are doomed to be dismissed. So that maybe he will stop these suits or at least make a credible suit next time.This might be my unfamiliarity with Canada law speaking, but I did notice something interesting about the decision - namely that the judge seemed to opine on the veracity of Rebel News' claims. Rebel News sought to dismiss Yaniv's complaint under Canada's version of an anti-SLAPP statute. (SLAPP = Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, basically initiating legal action to chill lawful debate and discussion.) In the US at least, the judge wouldn't really be too concerned about whether the underlying claims were true. The question is usually: "is there probable cause to believe that the plaintiff would succeed?" (or "is it likely the defendant's defenses won't succeed?") which is a very different standard than "are the claims actually true?" Typically, judges try to limit their opinion to the most basic reason to justify the decision. This judge seemed to go above and beyond on this one, which indicates to me that Yaniv is really being seen as a pest by the court and this decision was trying to communicate a clear message.
He also claims to be anorexic even though his fat ass cant even get out of the tub.But still he continues doing it. He is legit sub 80 iq.
I suppose the judge has to, with Yanny's relatively short record in actual civil big-boy court (and someone can please feel free to disagree with me one that.)In going above and beyond, the judge is trying to tell Jonathan why these type of lawsuits of his lacks merit and are doomed to be dismissed. So that maybe he will stop these suits or at least make a credible suit next time.
It is futile and a waste of time by the Judge to try this because Jonathan will not read the decision nor understand it.
I mean, this is the guy that no matter how many times a judge or court tells him "no, written note from your mum is NOT proof or a medical opinion".
Or how many times have he been told "If you claim costs you actually have to itemize the costs and show the receipts. You cant just claim the maximum number without any explanation".
But still he continues doing it. He is legit sub 80 iq.