Why are those on the left psyop'd to support mass immigration?

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Auron
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So this guy completely goes in a roundabout way to defend the left psyop. Marx was able to identify that immigration makes wages go down. Which is why every union before they become corrupt in the 1950s were against immigration.

Like i said before and you just repeated Marx thought immigration wouldn't matter if we were all communist with one government and one set of laws.

THAT ISN'T FUCKING POSSIBLE AS EVERY SHITSKIN THINKS THEIR WAY OF LIFE IS THE BEST. YOU THINK YOU ARE GONNA STOP INDIANS FROM DRINKING COW PISS? THE SOMALI FROM CUTTING OFF CLITS?

We are literally replacing every worker, blue collar and white collar, with pajeets in Canada who take lower wages and higher their own. And no matter how much time they spend here they still look out for their people.
Two things:
1. Dealing w/ the realities of modern day immigration would require lefties to admit that they were wrong about the blank slate i.e. there are significant differences in behavior between the races that can't be trained out of people. So they'll never get with the program on immigration, they place too much pride in their own beliefs.
2. I think you misunderstand the goal of Marx and all who came after him. Their goal is to usher in a socialist utopia, and nothing else. In their minds, the existing society that works well is much worse than the society that is broken and leaves the people desiring change (for obvious reasons). A lot of more hardcore lefties are pro-immigration to this end; they know damn well that immigration ruins society, and they like that, because a ruined society is easier to replace w/ a socialist society.
This is w/o getting into the weird racial/"colonist"/anti-white direction that leftism took in the 20th century (it's the dominant form of leftism as of today, imo). As it happens, brown people can be lefties too. But that's beside my above points.
 
So this guy completely goes in a roundabout way to defend the left psyop.
I'm not defending it, I'm pointing out that it's foundational to socialist thought, appearing as early as the first International. It's not a "psy-op" if it's something that has always been present in their ideology. Marx sought and encouraged the free movement of labour from the outset, as did many of his contemporaries, including the mass movement of labour to engage in the class struggle in new countries. What we'd call mass economic migration is a necessary element of the revolutionary process. The second international adopted the free movement of labour as a foundational principle in light of this belief.
 
Because
1662857938213649.png
 
Two things:
1. Dealing w/ the realities of modern day immigration would require lefties to admit that they were wrong about the blank slate i.e. there are significant differences in behavior between the races that can't be trained out of people. So they'll never get with the program on immigration, they place too much pride in their own beliefs.
2. I think you misunderstand the goal of Marx and all who came after him. Their goal is to usher in a socialist utopia, and nothing else. In their minds, the existing society that works well is much worse than the society that is broken and leaves the people desiring change (for obvious reasons). A lot of more hardcore lefties are pro-immigration to this end; they know damn well that immigration ruins society, and they like that, because a ruined society is easier to replace w/ a socialist society.
This is w/o getting into the weird racial/"colonist"/anti-white direction that leftism took in the 20th century (it's the dominant form of leftism as of today, imo). As it happens, brown people can be lefties too. But that's beside my above points.
Many people think that Marx was a monolith that always held the same opinions and that is why you see leftists debating if marx would like infinity niggas or not.
You are hitting the nail, marx was a hegelian and believed that utopia could be archieved and that was his only consistent thought of all his life.
He started believing that revolution would start either in germany or the UK because they were the most developed nations so they were the closest to the end of history (aka utopia) he also supported racial science, then he changed his ideas on racial science because he met people from other countries and in his final days he started defending that revolution would start in poor countries.

TLDR: Utopia justifies the means used to archieve it, you can find quotes of marx saying whatever suits your interests.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole