All right you motherfuckers, y'all better appreciate the effort that I put into this...all 30 minutes of it. I had to
go back and listen to her blathering! Oh the humanity!
Anyways, here's the plot of her stated weight per day. I put in notes as far as what happened each day, but for now focus on the box at lower left.
Wyświetl załącznik 1739816
Within that lower-left box are two things of interest. At top is the straight-line equation that best fits the data, which shows our Gorl is losing a very consistent 1.6 pounds per day. The R-squared value underneath is an indication of how well the given data fit the line. The maximum possible R-squared value is 1 (100%), and the minimum is 0 (0%). Our Gorl's stated weight fits the extrapolated linear curve with an R-squared value of 98.5%. Pretty good!
Except...
Except in that same six (seven?) day time period she had three admitted binges. One of them is most likely the Panera Mukbang she put online, another one she didn't describe in detail, and the last is the PF Chang's/McDonalds binge where she sucked the breading off of a 20-piece McNugget order like some kind of carb-craving vampire.
That's not to mention the possible snacking off of Becky's garlic Texas toast feast right back on day one.
All of those extra calories and such, and yet she consistently drops 1.6 pounds per day to within a 98.5% fit?
This all, of course, glosses over the fact that a 1.6 pound variation is well within the noise level for someone her size.
Yeah, pull the other one. It's got bells on it.
I analyze data for a living, you lying cow. Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.