TED Entertainment Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber, Morgan Kamal Majed, and Kasey Caviness, California 2:25-cv-5564, 2:25-cv-5565,Missouri 4:25-cv-459 - Ethan Klein Suing three women and 10 redditors for Copyright Infringement.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Alexandra Marwa Saber 2:25-cv-05564 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05564
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 Cze 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    9 Cze 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Alexandra Marwa Saber, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 45)

# Date Description Filing
44 9 Cze 2026 STATUS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S MARCH 2, 2026 ORDER [DKT. NO. 29] filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/10/2026) PDF
43 5 Cze 2026 COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 06/05/2026 to 06/05/2026 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment, Inc.. Court will contact Rom Bar-Nissim at Rom@HeahBarNissim.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Hearing for Motion for Judgement on the Pleadings on June 5, 2026. FEE PAID. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 06/06/2026) PDF
42 4 Cze 2026 MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COMPLAINT 35 Hearing held before Judge Wesley L. Hsu. The Court's Tentative Ruling was issued on June 4, 2026, and reviewed by counsel. The Court heard oral argument. The Court took the matter UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Recorder: CourtSmart. (lom) (Entered: 06/05/2026) PDF
41 2 Cze 2026 SCHEDULING NOTICE AND (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CHANGING THE TIME OF THE MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Complaint 35 scheduled for 6/05/2026 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu: The Court, on its own motion, changes the time to 2:15 PM. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/03/2026)
2 Cze 2026  

Ted Entertainment Inc. v. Morgan Kamal Majed 2:25-cv-05565 — District Court, C.D. California

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-05565
  • Court
    District Court, C.D. California
  • Filed
    18 Cze 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    19 Maj 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Does, Ted Entertainment Inc., Morgan Kamal Majed

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 16)

# Date Description Filing
16 19 Maj 2026 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Morgan Kamal Majed p/k/a Frogan. (iv) (Entered: 05/20/2026) PDF
15 18 Maj 2026 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Morgan Kamal Majed filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit) (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 05/19/2026) 1 2 3
14 4 Sie 2025 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTEND ING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 13 by Judge John F. Walter. Frogan's deadline to respond to TEI's complaint extended to October 3, 2025. (iv) (Entered: 08/06/2025) PDF
13 4 Sie 2025 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 3, 2025 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 08/05/2025) 1 2
12 17 Lip 2025 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ted Entertainment Inc., upon Defendant Morgan Kamal Majed served on 7/14/2025, answer due 8/4/2025. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe - Member of Household in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 07/18/2025) PDF

Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. Caviness 4:25-cv-00459 — District Court, W.D. Missouri

  • Docket No.
    4:25-cv-00459
  • Court
    District Court, W.D. Missouri
  • Filed
    18 Cze 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Both
  • Last Filing
    7 Gru 2025

Parties (3)

Parties
Does 1-10, Kacey Caviness, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 36)

# Date Description Filing
27 7 Gru 2025 ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron only. In the event that the settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. In addition, the Court retains jurisdiction over enforcement of the settlement agreed to by the parties. Signed on 12/8/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 12/08/2025) PDF
26 1 Gru 2025 STIPULATION of dismissal without prejudice as to Defendant Kacey Caviness p/k/a Kaceytron by Ted Entertainment, Inc.. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) (Entered: 12/02/2025) PDF
25 7 Paź 2025 DESIGNATION OF NEUTRAL by Kacey Caviness, Does 1-10. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/08/2025) PDF
24 5 Paź 2025 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed on 10/6/25 by District Judge Brian C Wimes. (TLD) (Entered: 10/06/2025) PDF
23 1 Paź 2025 Joint MOTION for protective order for Approval of Proposed Protective Order filed by Benjamin Kassis on behalf of Kacey Caviness. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2025 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Kassis, Benjamin) (Entered: 10/02/2025) PDF

In re. Subpoenas to Reddit, Inc. and Ddiscord, Inc. 3:25-mc-80296 — District Court, N.D. California

  • Docket No.
    3:25-mc-80296
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. California
  • Filed
    21 Wrz 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    890 Other Statutory Actions
  • Cause
    Civil Miscellaneous Case
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    3 Cze 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Doe Defendants, Ted Entertainment, Inc.

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 60)

# Date Description Filing
48 1 Cze 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3553 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 46 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026) PDF
47 31 Maj 2026 USCA Case Number 26-3513 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for 49 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Doe Defendants. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2026) Modified on 6/3/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/4/2026 (pjf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/02/2026) PDF
49 28 Maj 2026 Petition For Writ Of Mandamus filed Directly with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (pjf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/04/2026) PDF
46 28 Maj 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Doe Defendants. Appeal of Order, Terminate Motions 45 (Appeal fee of $605 receipt number ACANDC-22041800 paid.) (Vulic, Leah) (Filed on 5/29/2026) (Entered: 05/29/2026) PDF
45 28 Kwi 2026 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 4/29/2026. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2026) (Entered: 04/29/2026) 1 2

Doe Defendants v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 26-3513 — Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-3513
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • Filed
    31 Maj 2026
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, DOE DEFENDANTS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 9)

# Date Description Filing
9 21 Cze 2026 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:10 PM]
8 21 Cze 2026 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Rosenfeld for Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:26 PM]
7 14 Cze 2026 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Ted Entertainment, Inc.. [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:03 PM] PDF
6 3 Cze 2026 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Court entered filing to correct DE 5] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:28 PM] PDF
5 3 Cze 2026 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Doe Defendants. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 6] [Entered: 06/04/2026 03:09 PM] [Edited: 06/04/2026 03:29 PM]
Before the merge happens & his lol suit happen but remember its Canada.
1781059514428.png
 
Update
Tldr: warned & FAFO
Ethan Klein explains why he's suing iDubbbz and not Destiny

"Ian has deeply aligned with the snark community that is basically responsible for and celebrated cps coming to my house..and sending human skulls to my home..on the snark discord..they have on the banner, a skull with cps on the forehead, they love it they're proud of it..iDubbbz aligns with them, shouts them out, calls them great ppl..he's in deep with them"

"Even in his follow up to his content cop, he justified it, he said I think it's good CPS was called and investigated that..as someone who's been to Ethan's house"

"Basically rebroadcasting this comment uncritically..he emphasizes throughout that he does think it's a serious accusation that needs to be investigated"

"Ik ppl are like well why don't sue Destiny..this was a comment made in passing, Ian put it on his screen for 2 hours during his main broadcast..Destiny made it clear that he's not being serious pretty much immediately after writing it..ppl knew Destiny was being a giant f'in pos but he immediately afterwards made it clear that he didn't actually think that"

"This was after CPS visited my house..with all the sh*t we been through..I've been through a lot of sh*t w ppl online..this is just unhinged..I said from the beginning that if ppl want to go after my children then the rules of engagement have changed forever"

"If somebody u know who's met ur children and family said u m-lestd ur children after CPS has been to ur house..I don't see how u can say that I'm not justified..is that free speech, I don't think so?"

"When my children enter the picture..said this back then..bets are off, the rules have changed..I will do everything to ensure that ppl do not talk about my children in this way..that ppl do not celebrate K'ing my children..ppl like Ian retweeting ppl that say they want to K my children which he has done"

"I would just want to get this to ppl like Charlie and other commentators who are like this is an attack on free speech, it's not free speech to say that stuff..I'm pretty heavy free speech..but obviously that there's limits"

"I literally don't know Destiny..it was a comment in passing he made..clarified that he's kidding..Ian who I know, who's been to my house, met my children, broadcast it over his screen for his whole show..that's kind of the difference between him and Destiny"
Screenshot_20260610_200201_Chrome.jpg

 
Accusing someone repeatedly of molesting his own children, when that is untrue, is about as far from protected speech as you can get.
That all this is really over (((Israel bad))) is blowing my mind.

Ethan really got in tight with the absolute scummiest retards on earth and is now reaping what he inadvertently sowed for years.
 
I can agree with Ethan's arguments of why he sued idubbbz to a degree, but I feel his argument about Destiny and why he doesn't sue him is weak.
I think the simple fact that Destiny apologized and did not keep repeating it makes the case hard to win.

All the idiot has to say is: "Yes, I said that. Yes, I fucked up. Yes I apologized/retracted/clarified" and it would be hart for Ethan to argue Destiny did any real damage, especially compared to iDubbz and the retard brigade around Hasan who have been running with the topic for YEARS - unapologetic doubling down.

You cannot assign the same damage/harm to multiple causes, so going after Destiny would harm his case against iDubbz and vice versa.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I’m also pretty concerned about Ethan’s lawyers professional capabilities given that he probably could’ve avoided the judgment in favour of Denims had he not been busy putting the history of Israel-Palestine and photos of Hitler in the complaint. Also of note is that the last time that Mr. Bar-Nissim represented H3 in an appeal, he lost to Ryan Kavanaugh.
This lawyer worked on Ethan previous fair use cases so he has a history with Ethan and a history of winning.

I think the simple fact that Destiny apologized and did not keep repeating it makes the case hard to win.

All the idiot has to say is: "Yes, I said that. Yes, I fucked up. Yes I apologized/retracted/clarified" and it would be hart for Ethan to argue Destiny did any real damage, especially compared to iDubbz and the retard brigade around Hasan who have been running with the topic for YEARS - unapologetic doubling down.

You cannot assign the same damage/harm to multiple causes, so going after Destiny would harm his case against iDubbz and vice versa.
What did idubbz say specifically?
 
What did idubbz say specifically?
I only know what Ethan said in the video, since the case was filed in Alberta Canada I have no access to court documents.
A Canadian Kiwi would have to look into getting those, and paying impressive sums for them as well.

Without the actual court filings I can only speculate and I don't think that is worthwhile. (He supposedly said Ethan molests his children, but again, I'd love to see the evidence filed to support this claim)

Might as well wait for the filings to get leaked somewhere by someone and then see what evidence Ethan presents and how convincing it is.

Hey Ethan, I know you are constantly trolling your threads, could we get the complaint please? Thanks
 
(He supposedly said Ethan molests his children, but again, I'd love to see the evidence filed to support this claim)
I assume it's over this:
He took a screenshot of something Destiny said from the snark sub, and then made it his watermark for a good chunk of stream.
Ethan said Destiny apologized, and that it was a remark made in passing, so it wasn't being blasted to stream viewers.
Screenshot_20260611_140703_YouTube ReVanced.jpg
Ian, however, decided it was something he should be displaying, uncritically, on his stream, even when talking about other stuff.

He said Ethan should address this, so it's being addressed.
 
I can agree with Ethan's arguments of why he sued idubbbz to a degree, but I feel his argument about Destiny and why he doesn't sue him is weak.
Let's be real, Ian is being sued because he's in Canada and Destiny isn't being sued because he's in Florida. It's as simple as that. The laws in Florida would make it a waste of time to sue Destiny, and the laws in Canada make it worth Ethan's time and money to sue Ian. I'm not even going to pretend that it's anything other than that.

The reasons Ethan is spouting are post-hoc justifications obfuscating the truth. He's holding a permanent grudge over the CPS calls and the skulls, and the shoddy laws of Canada have allowed him to target Ian. Everything else, literally all the minutiae of how and where each of them broadcast the inciting message, means literally fucking nothing to Ethan other than it's more shit he can spew to justify the thing which was already 110% justified in his head anyways.
 
Ian, however, decided it was something he should be displaying, uncritically, on his stream, even when talking about other stuff.

He said Ethan should address this, so it's being addressed.
Yeah, that is completely retarded by iDubbz.
He is basically asking for it and he defense will be: "I did not say that, someone else did!"

He will be happy to learn about liability attached to republication.

Assuming Canadian law isn't too far away from US law. I keep forgetting we are jumping to Commonwealth legalese, which could be completely retarded for all we know. Who am I kidding, it definitely is.
 
I only know what Ethan said in the video, since the case was filed in Alberta Canada I have no access to court documents.
A Canadian Kiwi would have to look into getting those, and paying impressive sums for them as well.

Without the actual court filings I can only speculate and I don't think that is worthwhile. (He supposedly said Ethan molests his children, but again, I'd love to see the evidence filed to support this claim)

Might as well wait for the filings to get leaked somewhere by someone and then see what evidence Ethan presents and how convincing it is.

Hey Ethan, I know you are constantly trolling your threads, could we get the complaint please? Thanks
I wonder if Runkle will cover it. Maybe some other lawyers can pitch in to help pay for it.
 
He's holding a permanent grudge over the CPS calls and the skulls, and the shoddy laws of Canada have allowed him to target Ian.
I agree with your theory, but disagree with what seems like you have some sort of animosity for Klein wanting to sue Ian. I think despising people who wanted (and then literally did attempt) to destroy your family because they're disgusting freaks who assign you a political view you don't actually have is actually fairly normal. Because they made up the reason to call CPS and send skulls, and then went and fucked with him.

And then the one person (technically two if you count Anisa) in your online circle of acquaintances who is perhaps the most qualified to be able to debunk the claims just does absolutely fucking nothing. As a matter of fact, it looks like he's actually taking their side and defending them. That's not just average betrayal. Part of the way defamation damages someone is not just the claim, it's also the person(s) who make the defamatory claim. Some random fucking faggot on Reddit saying Ethan is molesting his children is just some random Reddit faggot. Idubbbz, who was friends with Ethan, has met his children, and has been to his house repeating those claims is substantially worse.

Random internet faggots saying horrible shit about Ethan can be considered noise, but people who knew Ethan in real life, off-camera, they're judged to be more credible and more capable of damage, especially if they were a massive Youtube creator. And if Ian's not at the top of the list of people who could damage Ethan with lies about something you could reasonably assume he might have information about, he's near the top.

I don't know why the fuck you would ever insinuate someone known to be litigious and with the financial means to be something so horrifying while you live in an unfavorable jurisdiction unless you had really good evidence. And if you don't have the evidence (because it doesn't exist) and you still did it, that's even worse.
 
I don't know why the fuck you would ever insinuate someone known to be litigious and with the financial means to be something so horrifying while you live in an unfavorable jurisdiction unless you had really good evidence. And if you don't have the evidence (because it doesn't exist) and you still did it, that's even worse.
And fucking refuse to apologize and publicly retract after receiving a C&D with the promise to sue if they do not do as he asks.

Ethan TOLD THEM he would do this, and yet they kept going.
So Ian better have some good evidence, or a rope ready.
 
you have some sort of animosity for Klein wanting to sue Ian
Not at all! I'm so much so in favor of this that I have zero qualms highlighting where it could be seen as underhanded. Ian and Anisa are Muslim sympathizers who (try to) team up with arguably the most influential antisemitic voice today, Hasan Piker, to sow hatred for my people. As a Jew myself, I believe Ethan Klein should be allowed to cage and beat them on principle with impunity. Leaving them financially crushed beyond dust with a Canadian defamation lawsuit is good enough, I suppose.
 
I know Hasan is the most likely to be antisemitic but is it really that or is everyone crying wolf?
He hates everyone, which is why he simps for communist dictatorships and pushes for the destruction of Western society
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole