Retard tourists sperging about women in twitch thread

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So if a massive guy sneak-grabbed you without warning and stuck his mouth on yours / tongue in your mouth that wouldn't be assault? Or is she supposed to be more okay with it because she's a girl? I presume you wouldn't feel entitled to punch a guy who suddenly started sticking his mouth all over yours, because punching him would be assault, and he should only merit a fine. Would you say she wouldn't be entitled to defend herself from a man doing this because a woman physically striking a man is assault and she'd therefore be the one initiating an assault because what he did wasn't assaulting her? Enquiring minds want to know.
She put herself in that situation, applied poor risk management, despite being in a position able to have a dozen body building security details, for her marketing gig netting her 7 figures in profits and is now crying for clout, that the company she partnered with voluntarily, full well knowing their security policy didn't had a soviet union style KGB vetting process for anybody potentially getting into her personal space.

Legally it might be assault, that's for a court to decide, but hardly comparable to a random woman or man getting involuntarily touched in public. Your argument underlines funnily enough that the laws surrounding self defense are communist crap.
 
As an EU fag I don't understand it either...
It's outrageous and I don't understand it. It's such a strange phenomenon. Just look at how many people are negative sticker reacting me, it's because despite the fact that they know that I'm right, that little twinge in their dick they get when they think about a cam slut brings out the white knight in them lol.
The facts are the facts and the facts don't change whether you like them or not, and the facts are:
#1 she was a cam whore who scammed people
#2 she manipulated people into thinking there was more there if she thought she could get more money out of them
#3 she willingly went to a place that was full of the men that she manipulated and robbed
#4 AFTER THE FACT she is using what in my opinion is a very benign misunderstanding by a mentally ill person to bump her subscriber count and manipulate people for more money.
She's fucking SCUM. She's like that hooker in the movie Idiocracy where she tricks dumb people into paying her money and tells them "We'll have sex later" lol.
I knew that I was going to get a bunch of autistic and dumb reaction stickers for saying my piece so I wasn't going to say anything, but it's the fact that this fucking greedy bitch got back online so fast that her fingers got rug burned from hitting the keyboard so she could use this to her advantage to sucker more people out of money that is so enraging.
Everyone in this equation makes me sick. Her simps, her defenders, the platform and most of all her.
 
They have cash to go to college, to start a business that isn’t streaming, etc.
The smart ones do just that, or they buy businesses that are likely to be profitable year in year out (like gas stations) and invest in things which will increase in value long term (like real estate). They should still probably diversify their investments and spend less so they can do so, but not all thots are frittering away everything they earn with no plan for their future. Some could already drop off the internet entirely, change their name and persona (many pretty women are unrecognisable without makeup) and never have to work again for the money.

#2 she manipulated people into thinking there was more there if she thought she could get more money out of them
Is a guy who spends all his money on strippers being manipulated and scammed? It's called "strip tease" for a reason and he has no right to think there's more no matter how much he spends. Likewise with women who stalk celebrities and creators because they're convinced they're entitled to something more. Adults have agency and mature adults recognise boundaries.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I don’t know about Twitch Con but after reading the last few pages I’m beginning to think women aren’t safe on a Kiwi Farms.
As long as they aren't ripping off retards and then trying to play the victim I have no problem with women.
Ah the left brain, deficiently breed for being slaves, underlining my pet theory of all you faggots being teleological materialistic universalistic collectivist cultists or opportunists of the former that in my opinion don't deserve to exist. Here I said it.
I myself DO believe that every single nigger on the planet should be genocided, so don't feel bad.
 
Answer my question. Why does me saying he's tall make you think of genocide and politics?
At the risk of getting a warning by the mods for infighting and off topic: Do you really feel and believe you are entitled for me to entertain your request. Be happy this is online, offline you would have a steelcaped boot in your face already
 
and never have to work again for the money.
I hate to be a stickler but again my point of contention is that they never had to work for the money in the first place.
At the risk of getting a warning by the mods for infighting and off topic: Do you really feel and believe you are entitled for me to entertain your request. Be happy this is online, offline you would have a steelcaped boot in your face already
Come on you guys, be nice. Can't we all just come together and make fun of twitch streamers?
 
At the risk of getting a warning by the mods for infighting and off topic: Do you really feel and believe you are entitled for me to entertain your request. Be happy this is online, offline you would have a steelcaped boot in your face already
Most stable "these thots deserved it" poster.

A very normal response to me asking why you did something.

You asked me something to in the previous post, should I have responded with violence as well?
 
I myself DO believe that every single nigger on the planet should be genocided, so don't feel bad.
If you have the means to do that, more power to you, expect push back. But if you expect somebody else to do it for you because you feel entitled for it and everybody needs to sacrifice their own interest and preferences for your well-being else they are 'the bad guys', yeah.
 
What's the scam? Donate money to me!

That's the scam?
Manipulation of the mentally ill, the delusional and the autistic is the scam.
You're really gleaning over my posts if you don't understand what the scam is at this point.
This is no different than if I went to a nursing home and told a bunch of dementia patients I was their husband and to sign everything they had over to me in their will.
Taking advantage of people who are nutters is taking advantage of people who are nutters. The equation doesn't change just because the scammer happens to be a girl that you would fuck.
I just realized that I'm fighting an uphill battle trying to get my point across with people who probably subscribe and donate to these new age Nigerian scammers, so I'm going to go ahead and hit the ejector seat on this thread because I don't think I'm going to be changing hearts and minds anytime soon.
 
It's outrageous and I don't understand it. It's such a strange phenomenon. Just look at how many people are negative sticker reacting me, it's because despite the fact that they know that I'm right, that little twinge in their dick they get when they think about a cam slut brings out the white knight in them lol.
The facts are the facts and the facts don't change whether you like them or not, and the facts are:
#1 she was a cam whore who scammed people
#2 she manipulated people into thinking there was more there if she thought she could get more money out of them
#3 she willingly went to a place that was full of the men that she manipulated and robbed
#4 AFTER THE FACT she is using what in my opinion is a very benign misunderstanding by a mentally ill person to bump her subscriber count and manipulate people for more money.
She's fucking SCUM. She's like that hooker in the movie Idiocracy where she tricks dumb people into paying her money and tells them "We'll have sex later" lol.
I knew that I was going to get a bunch of autistic and dumb reaction stickers for saying my piece so I wasn't going to say anything, but it's the fact that this fucking greedy bitch got back online so fast that her fingers got rug burned from hitting the keyboard so she could use this to her advantage to sucker more people out of money that is so enraging.
Everyone in this equation makes me sick. Her simps, her defenders, the platform and most of all her.
I kind of agree and would never shed a single tear for an e-thot.

But then again, who wouldn't catch a bag with millions of dollars in it if a drooling retard threw it at you? I'd bet the same money that you would. If the option is to either be a wagie, or be a millionaire but hurt some retards feelings, you'd be absolutely mental to not choose the latter.
 
Most stable "these thots deserved it" poster.

A very normal response to me asking why you did something.

You asked me something to in the previous post, should I have responded with violence as well?
If I misinterpreted your subtext, so be it, my mistake. Am I going to beg for forgiveness by the oh great Lemmingwiser, lol, no. If you expect that I play your disingenuous language games, for your gotcha moment, I repeat myself, go suck on a 12ga
 
I told you I found love I didn't say I was IN love.
Why... did Candy say something about me???
For something to be "scamming", the scammed party has to have been set up to believe something, and then have their expectations betrayed. The thread is arguing that Emiru did not set up her audience to believe she had amorous feelings for them.

I think the point of the stripper example is that almost nobody who goes to a strip club really thinks the stripper is in love with them: It's just a weird kind of indulgence/fantasy/roleplay kind of thing where the girls pretend to like the guys, and the guys pretend to believe them. It's sort of like suspension of disbelief in fiction; there's an unspoken agreement between the author and reader to just pretend all this shit happened and that all those characters are real.

I think the perspective of the thread is that e-girls are only advertising this kind of mutually agreed-upon pretending, and anyone who fails to understand this is a retard whose retardation need not be morally defended. It's like the people who harass the actor who played Draco Malfoy from Harry Potter: The little boy being mean for the camera is not "asking" to be harassed.

The viewers, though helplessly retarded, are culpable moral agents who should be held accountable precisely because they're too retarded to act right otherwise, and a punishment is worth a thousand lectures.


ETA:
If you can find examples of her explicitly leading on her audience beyond being a pretty girl talking to nerds on camera, I will take the L on this.
 
I kind of agree and would never shed a single tear for an e-thot.

But then again, who wouldn't catch a bag with millions of dollars in it if a drooling retard threw it at you? I'd bet the same money that you would. If the option is to either be a wagie, or be a millionaire but hurt some retards feelings, you'd be absolutely mental to not choose the latter.
That's where you're wrong, my main man. I'm not selling my dignity for $2 million dollars, which after taxes probably comes to less than a million, especially if it makes me a target for people who are fucking INSANE.
On top of that they expect me to go to conventions? Full of the same people I manipulated into giving me every penny they had thinking that they had some kind of relationship with me? You're on fucking walkabout.
I don't enjoy my job, but it's not terrible and the money is pretty good. Honestly I don't need to be a millionaire with the way I live. Sure it would be nice, but if it came with the kind of permanent migraines that comes with being an online prozzie larper, you can keep it.
 
Important rules for attending cons:

- Cosplay is consent
- If they're dressed like sluts, grab their butts
- Touching is always okay
- The overwhelming majority of sexual harassment is never reported
- Only a small fraction of reported incidents are ever prosecuted, and an ever smaller fraction end with a conviction
- Many cosplayers are working part time as onlyfans prostitutes
 
ETA:
If you can find examples of her explicitly leading on her audience beyond being a pretty girl talking to nerds on camera, I will take the L on this.
I am sorry but I am not going to watch any of her streams to try to prove myself right here, we can just agree to disagree with one caveat: I have never seen her do it specifically because I've never watched her streams, but I have ABSOLUTELY seeing streams of girls leading on their audience for higher donations.
 
Ed Sheeran and and Taylor Swift are two of the most parasocial celebrities out there, but they set boundaries and can afford the security to enforce them.
But Taylor Swift made her money making songs for teenage girls even though she's probablywell into her 40s. I can't believe you're making me say this about Taylor Swift, but she's famous because of her TALENT.
She's not out here bending over and spreading her butt cheeks apart showing her asshole for money and e-fame.
That would be the funniest thing of all time, though. Just an album cover of Taylor Swift reenacting goatse.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole