Twitch & Their Competitors / r/LivestreamFail / Live Streamer Community - Imitation of Hollywood

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Eh so she just got kissed? I thought it would be spicier, like Pajeet showing his shitty hands up her butt or something.

That's rude but.... that's hardly assault.
So if a massive guy sneak-grabbed you without warning and stuck his mouth on yours / tongue in your mouth that wouldn't be assault? Or is she supposed to be more okay with it because she's a girl? I presume you wouldn't feel entitled to punch a guy who suddenly started sticking his mouth all over yours, because punching him would be assault, and he should only merit a fine. Would you say she wouldn't be entitled to defend herself from a man doing this because a woman physically striking a man is assault and she'd therefore be the one initiating an assault because what he did wasn't assaulting her? Enquiring minds want to know.
 
I might be late on this one but I imagine that twitch is getting a percentage of every donation? That would make the most sense to me because realistically the simplest solution here would be to put a cap on how much you can donate to any one person every quarter or even year.
Depends on how they're accepting money from simps. Obviously twitch gets a cut of the money from subscribers, and then there's bits you can buy from twitch and donate(more money for twitch), and then there's the ad revenue twitch makes money on(the big streamers also get a chunk of this), any promotions twitch is running with a third party like sponsored streams(that weren't setup by the streamer or their manager/talent company on their own), sponsored twitch events(they do tournaments and shit like twitchcon of course), and so on. There's other services that also handle donations to streamers(and they take a cut as well) and like I mentioned managers(sometimes it's a boyfriend, sometimes it's an actual manager) and talent agencies that setup deals and take their cuts or regular fees. And then even after all of that, some streamers posts their amazon wishlists, so fans can just buy them shit as "gifts" and amazon owns twitch. And don't forget the hype train where if a streamer gets enough donations quickly enough, everyone gets a pop up announcing there's a "hype train" and to keep donating to make the level of the hype train go up and keep the timer from running out.

Twitch putting a cap on how much money someone can throw at a streamer on their site is never going to happen, especially when there's some saudi oil princes and shit who will throw thousands at some streamers.

But even with all of that, there's still weirdos out there who watch these people regularly, and may pull some shit like this due to the parasocial relationship they form with them, without ever throwing a dime at them.

Then of course there's merch(and even crowdfunding campaigns for some of it like plushies and shit), some streamers have discord servers and of course discord allows roles granted to users paying the server owner they get their special chatrooms and shit there instead of just twitch. Donation sites like that "buy me a kofi" thing, stream treat is another one where you can setup a food wishlist and people can doordash you food(fatties love this one). The stream overlays can be paid services as well, not to mention donations to trigger crap on screen like animations and sound effects or text to speech messages. It just keeps going and going.

Yes, there's an entire sub-economy framework for this shit.
 
Twitch is literally the worst content creation website and company ever.
The odds are that she probably requested extra security too and twitch either lied about accommodating to her or just flatout refused. Any response from them was likely sent out as late as possible so that she can't cancel the whole thing and refuse to go.
 
I'm criticizing your subtext around "tall guys" hugging somebody involuntarily without physical harm done leaving one mentally crippled. It sounded like some third wave feminazi that wants daddy state, preferably all made up of women, to regulate tall guys by force from existing and freely walking around because you feel threatened by their individual biological make up and what they are capable of doing due to being born like it.

Also in before, I don't like Niggers, yet I would never argue to have the state round them up and use a monopoly on violence to eliminate every risk they pose for being Niggers, that's how you get communism, absolving the individual from all responsibility for the virtual illusion of security.

Humans are large primates that are where they are because they are violent and clever, it implies risk that comes with being born one, not accounting for that on an individual level makes one a subhuman
Jesus, your earlier posts sounded somewhat levelheaded commenting on changing landscape, but this one sounds unhinged.

I don't even know where to begin to pick it apart.

Okay I do: I said the guy is tall. Why did me saying that make you think of a call to genocide all tall people?

Why did you think it would be an effective strategy to show you're a good guy, by saying you hate niggers, but don't want to genocide them?
 
So if a massive guy sneak-grabbed you without warning and stuck his mouth on yours / tongue in your mouth that wouldn't be assault? Or is she supposed to be more okay with it because she's a girl? I presume you wouldn't feel entitled to punch a guy who suddenly started sticking his mouth all over yours, because punching him would be assault, and he should only merit a fine. Would you say she wouldn't be entitled to defend herself from a man doing this because a woman physically striking a man is assault and she'd therefore be the one initiating an assault because what he did wasn't assaulting her? Enquiring minds want to know.
>bu-bu but h-he's a lanklet!!!
Doesn't matter. We're yet to see a clear picture of his face. He could have been a rec max preylet norwood5 chinlet literal subhuman and she still would have rejected him despite him being in 6 foot+ territory.
 
Step 1. E-girl.

Step 2. Find a house that is middle of the road, like 500-ish k.

Step 3. Pay in cash. Pad enough cash the IRS doesn’t fuck you.

Step 4. Get like 300k more and a financial advisor.

Step 5. Immediately change your name and get a new job that doesn’t require you being on camera nonstop. Dissolve your old identity.

The problem is most of these women know they can’t do any other type of work and never pass step 3. They legit offer nothing else to the world. Kind of sad, really, as any offspring will be like “Oh, yeah, grandma was the one dressing up like anime and showing her butthole all day on the internet.” Leaving a legacy of shame.

Kinda sad, really. You see all these people in streaming circles and they know this is the best it can get. A life of nonstop hedonism mixed with showmanship, like some kind of zoo exhibit for a sex monkey.

They have cash to go to college, to start a business that isn’t streaming, etc. but instead, they chose an easy life until forced to be part of a Muslim harem until eventually disposed of. Once the age starts creeping in, they know more and more it’s all getting to a terrible curtain call that norms can’t experience.
So if a massive guy sneak-grabbed you without warning and stuck his mouth on yours / tongue in your mouth that wouldn't be assault?
I think my reaction would be “AH a buck breaking duel is it? Draw thy penis, knave!!” and proceed to use his testicular region as speed bag before a dominate buck breaking.
Surely, a man who is a massive failure and yet somehow maintains an entitled attitude wouldn't simply go off to bother a random neighbor or coworker or family member if all e-thots were suddenly zapped out of existence.
Normal people have the ability to reeducate these men in far more effective ways to social normality.
 
Streamers being stalked or attacked is not new.
Not only in events but also in their houses.
Some fans from the texas streamers and LA streamers are fucking insane, like going to camp outside the house with a tent and see all they do, and reported to the police and then the guy did it again lmao

There was a story on YT about a Japanese weirdo who kept sending gifts and making advances to some singer (cant remember fully) and when she declined him, she sent him everything back except for one thing. This nigga went to an event and followed her up some stairs and almost stabbed her to death.

He did a few years and was released. She cant sing anymore, lost a lot of her dexterity, and is paranoid to be out in public. Life ruined by some lonely sperg.
 
I don’t know about Twitch Con but after reading the last few pages I’m beginning to think women aren’t safe on a Kiwi Farms.

So if a massive guy sneak-grabbed you without warning and stuck his mouth on yours / tongue in your mouth that wouldn't be assault?

Judging by how angry at women have the guys in this thread are I think they’d feel a sense of liberation and kiss him back.
 
lyou're a good guy, by saying you hate niggers, but don't want to genocide them?
Ah the left brain, deficiently breed for being slaves, underlining my pet theory of all you faggots being teleological materialistic universalistic collectivist cultists or opportunists of the former that in my opinion don't deserve to exist. Here I said it.

I have no need to be perceived as the 'good guy'. Go suck a 12ga
 
Ah the left brain, deficiently breed for being slaves, underlining my pet theory of all you faggots being teleological materialistic universalistic collectivist cultists or opportunists of the former that in my opinion don't deserve to exist. Here I said it.

I have no need to be perceived as the 'good guy'. Go suck a 12ga

Answer my question. Why does me saying he's tall make you think of genocide and politics?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole