Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
This is my biggest question I have. Why are Jews considered different from white? Is it for cultural reasons as Jewish culture is different from the European / Western culture or is it something else?
I agree. Either that or niggers must agree to self-sterilize in order to accept welfare. There's too many welfare queens gaming the system by popping out more and more niglets.
Oh my days, I always see on xitter how niggers cope about „muh white pedophiles“ when confronted with the crime statistics of said niggers. Of course those statistics that they reference don’t account per capita. Right now my retarted brain just connected the dots.
Oh my days, I always see on xitter how niggers cope about „muh white pedophiles“ when confronted with the crime statistics of said niggers. Of course those statistics that they reference don’t account per capita. Right now my retarted brain just connected the dots.
They're too retarded to even understand what "per capita" means. A lot of them think "per capita" is some "wypipo hoax" because that's how stupid they are. I'm not even joking. You can find blacks on social media mocking the concept of "per capita", not realizing that it only further shows how stupid they are, for not understanding what it means.
Probably. Black/Hispanic young women have a tendency to "develop" faster than white girls, or at least a tendency to just eat more and have big "fat girl boobs" as a result. And their brown parents don't care if their underage children dress like hookers or date old men. Just look at Kim K. and Kanye's daughter, North West, who is 12, but Kim lets her dress like a prostitute and hang out unsupervised with whoever she wants.
Black Jurors overwhelmingly will declare a White Defendant guilty, whereas White Jurors are less likely to declare a Black Defendant guilty. Blacks will always side with their own against Whites, even if the Black person is at fault. As seen with Karmelo Anthony and Saint George Floyd.
Arthur Jensen's work is pretty essential for racial research, and his works ought to be properly scrapped through and TL;DR'd into this thread by someone with more time than I. To find much of his work for free, I recommend this site:
One particularly fascinating thing he wrote of, despite not being as well-established as the black-white IQ gap is the differences in behavior of black and white children who have an IQ under 70 (i.e. are mentally retarded). In his observations, and corroborated from the testimony of educators and caretakers, Jensen asserted black children with low IQ's are largely able to appear socially/behaviorally normal while retarded white children suffer from obvious defects in their behavior and social ability. This difference is described as familial retardation (the former, more "normal" looking variety) and organic retardation (the latter, more obviously dysfunctional kind).
Teachers of retarded classes claimed that far more of their black pupils seem to look and act less retarded than the white pupils with comparable IQ. This was especially apparent in social interactions and playground activities observed by teachers during recess and recreation periods.
Their observations were indeed accurate, as I later confirmed by my own observation and testing of pupils in special classes.
In social and outdoor play activities, black children with IQ below seventy seldom appeared as other than quite normal youngsters--energetic, sociable, active, motorically well coordinated, and generally indistinguishable from their age-mates in regular classes.
But this was not so for as many of the white children with IQ below seventy. More of them were somehow "different" from their white age-mates in regular classes. They appeared less competent in social interactions with their classmates and were motorically clumsy or awkward, or walked with a flat-footed gait.
The retarded white children more often looked and acted generally retarded in their development than the black children of comparable IQ.
In most of the cognitive tasks of the classroom that call for conceptual learning and problem solving, however, black and white retarded children of the same IQ do not differ measurably either in classroom performance or on objective achievement tests.
The explanation for these differences cannot be that the IQ test is biased in its predictive validity for the children's general scholastic learning, because predictive validity scarcely differs between black and white groups. Nor is the test biased according to any of the other standard criteria of bias.
There are two distinguishable types of mental retardation, referred to as familial and organic. The lower tail (IQ < 70) of the normal distribution of IQ in the population comprises both of these types of retardation.
In familial retardation, there are no detectable causes of retardation other than the normal polygenic and microenvironmental sources of IQ variation that account for IQ differences throughout the entire range of IQ.
Although persons with familial retardation are, on average, lower in IQ than their parents and siblings, they are no lower than would be expected for a trait with normal polygenic inheritance.
In other words, the familial retarded are biologically normal individuals who deviate statistically from the population mean because of the same factors that cause IQ variation among all other biologically normal individuals in the population.
Organic retardation, on the other hand, comprises over 350 identified etiologies, including specific chromosomal and genetic anomalies and environmental prenatal, perinatal, and postanatal brain damage due to disease or trauma that affects brain development.
Nearly all of these conditions, when severe enough to cause mental retardation, also have other, more general, neurological and physical manifestations of varying degree.
The IQ of organically retarded children is scarcely correlated with the IQ of their first-order relatives, and they typically stand out as deviant in other ways as well.
TL;DR: retarded black children are more socially capable and appear more "normal" than white peers of similar IQ's because they're simply on the lower tail of the black IQ bell (familial retardation) while extremely low IQ's only really appear in white children who suffer from an extreme genetic abnormality (organic retardation).
Higher IQ leads to non action instead, and creates brilliant underachievers even more often, or as easily (many such cases on online forums and image boards).
Yes, if you look at a million people, higher IQ people on average earn more. But there is too many exceptions: low IQ wealthy people or high IQ that never got to use their "potential".
IQ/income correlation is irrelevant since it is a mix of intelligence, ability to make decisions, social skills... Thinking vs Doing
I'd argue there is an environmental/cultural component to this as well depending on where you live. Will flaunting wealth bring you a lot of status or is that culturally seen as tacky? Do you risk becoming homeless or going into huge medical debt with a bit of bad luck? In other words, do you need to make a lot of money or can you feel safe and comfortable with less?
I'd say things like these will be very different depending on whether you live in say Scandinavia or the US even if your iq and personality are the same.
