Jonathan "Jessica" Yaniv assaults reporter Keeane Bexte 1/13/20 - GET AWAY FROM ME YOU FUCKING CRAZY FUCKING THING

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Nuke Canada. This kid-diddling fat faggot will never face consequences for anything in that shithole.
 
His notice to appear for his mother's strata contains some conditions* on keeping the peace and not opening weapons, iirc.
I was thinking more on the lines of the ones issued after him being convicted.

(* Chris Elston also)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Okay, are we getting trolled?

> Yaniv says they are seeing a therapist (Chrisoula Litaris) who specializes in cognitive behaviour therapy.


Chrisoula Litaris? C LITARIS? You mean that thing Yaniv can't find and may have fallen off?

Google can't seem to find any reference to "Chrisoula Litaris" either. Literally not a single hit. Did he give a fake name to the court?
 
Okay, are we getting trolled?

> Yaniv says they are seeing a therapist (Chrisoula Litaris) who specializes in cognitive behaviour therapy.


Chrisoula Litaris? C LITARIS? You mean that thing Yaniv can't find and may have fallen off?

Google can't seem to find any reference to "Chrisoula Litaris" either. Literally not a single hit. Did he give a fake name to the court?
Screenshot 2022-05-27 at 09-20-22 Jessica Yaniv Simpson Assault Trial Day 2 MeowMix.png Screenshot 2022-05-27 at 09-20-55 Chrisoula Liatiras - Clinical Counsellor in Psychology - Mor...png Screenshot 2022-05-27 at 09-22-24 Psychotherapist Near Me - Psychotherapist Vancouver — Luna T...png
"soul purpose" BARF
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A conditional discharge for simple assault is the kind of thing a decent Canadian defense lawyer would negotiate for you with the crown prosecutor if you agreed to plea guilty without trial.

The fact that he fought it and lost and still got an escape hatch to get out of this without a criminal record is some real troon armor.

E: The good news is that he can never again play the "first violent offense" card after this finding of guilt. He's officially on thin ice forever where attacking people is concerned and especially for the period of the conditions. A violation will result in a new sentence for his existing charge, and likely additional charge(s) for the violation.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A conditional discharge for simple assault is the kind of thing a decent Canadian defense lawyer would negotiate for you with the crown prosecutor if you agreed to plea guilty without trial.

The fact that he fought it and lost and still got an escape hatch to get out of this without a criminal record is some real troon armor.

E: The good news is that he can never again play the "first violent offense" card after this finding of guilt. He's officially on thin ice forever where attacking people is concerned and especially for the period of the conditions. A violation will result in a new sentence for his existing charge, and likely additional charge(s) for the violation.
How will the Bexte loss affect the next trial for assault on the elderly? Does it count as a prior, & can it be used?
 
How will the Bexte loss affect the next trial for assault on the elderly? Does it count as a prior, & can it be used?

In terms of "counting" as a prior conviction, it won't constitute a criminal record if he secures the discharge by keeping his nose clean. He would be able to pass a record check for a clearance or etc. But if he's found guilty again of some form of assault, this history does exist and will be cited in the prosecution's presentencing argument next time around.

This is taken into account by the sentencing judge, who will have the responsibility to weigh mitigating and exacerbating factors in rendering a decision, and when it comes to an act of assault you generally don't get more than one freebie (unless you're a cop).
 
In terms of "counting" as a prior conviction, it won't constitute a criminal record if he secures the discharge by keeping his nose clean. He would be able to pass a record check for a clearance or etc. But if he's found guilty again of some form of assault, this history does exist and will be cited in the prosecution's presentencing argument next time around.

This is taken into account by the sentencing judge, who will have the responsibility to weigh mitigating and exacerbating factors in rendering a decision, and when it comes to an act of assault you generally don't get more than one freebie (unless you're a cop).
A tad confused...so if for some strange reason (if, humour me here) the courts decide to hold the strata assault case within his "probation" period the Bexte case result will be taken into consideration when sentencing?

If so I can see yaniv doing his usual delay tactics to ensure there's no overlap in the probation period and the strata case.
 
The previous charge and finding of guilt will be brought up at any possible future trial and sentencing for the Feb 25 charges. It would be utter misconduct for the Crown not to field that ammunition. It's not good for him either way but it will be much worse if he digs himself further by a violation of conditions. I expect this to go past 14 months in any case, not because of delaying tactics but because of the pace of processing steps.

Based on the documents in the other thread, he was charged with three criminal code violations allegedly committed Feb 25. He had an appearance scheduled for today, May 30, listed as a "CLC" appearance -- Consult Legal Counsel. That step isn't a dive into the meat and potatoes of the process, it's still just laying groundwork.

What we're looking for is AHR, an arraignment hearing, where the charges will be formally read and the defendant, having had adequate consultation and understanding the charges, will enter a plea. That's generally a plea of guilty if his lawyer has worked out a plea deal, or not guilty if the client maintains innocence. Most cases are plead out but Yaniv is an idiot who thinks he lives in a movie so he's the type to fight everything. I would bet he will plead not guilty again.

That means the next step will be to set a trial date. If found guilty there, that will lead to presentencing reports and ultimately a sentencing hearing. (If he pleads guilty with or without a deal, we go straight here, to presentencing and sentencing).

The full process will take a long time, especially assuming he goes to trial again, and we can take solace in this ongoing pain in the ass for that fucking creep.

E: to be clear, in Canada a conditional discharge isn't expunged until three years after the completion of the probation. The new process will not be delayed that long.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
to be clear, in Canada a conditional discharge isn't expunged until three years after the completion of the probation.
Also of note - a conditional discharge doesn't prevent your misdeeds from appearing in certain searches. The weapons charge and now the assault charge will show up when fatso tries to enter another country. Also, the police still have access to that information. About the only place it won't appear is on a criminal record check for employment (ie., on the public record).
 
How will the Bexte loss affect the next trial for assault on the elderly? Does it count as a prior, & can it be used?
To my understanding it the latest assault hearing will not break the Bexte case conditions because it happened before he was convicted. I get the feeling that his next assault hearing will be spicier than bexte, because of his weapon related criminal charge, his history of violent behavior, and the assault happening in a senior orientated facility. Oddly enough there have been a concerning amount of assaults reported against seniors around Vancouver BC during Covid, any lawyer worth their salt can build a strong case against yaniv.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole