Evidence of lawbreaking

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Obviously, this doesn’t come close to some of the other potential crimes she is potentially guilty of, but it is still a third class felony.
I actually disagree, and I have mentioned this particular crime before. People seem to look at it like it's ripping off mattress tags or some similar nonsense, but the Postmaster General does not. This is one of the few actual concrete crimes which is completely unambiguous and if she fucked with the mail in any way, that's a serious crime, and the sort that is actually prosecuted because there are no political implications whatsoever. It's quite simply did you do it? Then you're guilty.
It'd be easier to get her on selling drugs or date rape if those claims have any evidence or any victims would come forward.
And then you look at something like this. If you think about it for a minute or two, you realize that by bringing a charge of something like date rape against someone like this, you're making a strong political statement that yes, women can rape, too. Who the fuck do you think is going to do that, no matter how true it is?
 
I actually disagree, and I have mentioned this particular crime before. People seem to look at it like it's ripping off mattress tags or some similar nonsense, but the Postmaster General does not. This is one of the few actual concrete crimes which is completely unambiguous and if she fucked with the mail in any way, that's a serious crime, and the sort that is actually prosecuted because there are no political implications whatsoever. It's quite simply did you do it? Then you're guilty.

And then you look at something like this. If you think about it for a minute or two, you realize that by bringing a charge of something like date rape against someone like this, you're making a strong political statement that yes, women can rape, too. Who the fuck do you think is going to do that, no matter how true it is?
We live in a world where Bella Janke gets away with her shit cause "women can't rape" and other shit she's being shielded about.

If only Allen was the ring leader he'd be in jail right now.

Also +1 on the mail, they take that shit VERY fucking seriously. Not gonna go on a long rambling story like normal but, certain can confirm this.
 
Also +1 on the mail, they take that shit VERY fucking seriously. Not gonna go on a long rambling story like normal but, certain can confirm this.
This is also my general view on the crimes of this whore. There is a tendency to seek out the more political ones and shit like "transphobia." Yes, her actually more repugnant actions, even to me, are things with this political overlay to them. However, those are also the ones that immediately polarize everyone and turn it into some kind of retarded "debate" over the social issue involved.

I think this is how she's gotten away with this bullshit. I think a focus on the low-key, seemingly less awful stuff is how you take this bitch down. This is stuff where they can go after her and nobody can really claim "muh social justice warriors" and other bullshit that she hides behind.

Ironically, she's actually in one of those of her own doing in New York on Sunday, apparently. Dumb mall ninja shit.
 
This is also my general view on the crimes of this whore. There is a tendency to seek out the more political ones and shit like "transphobia." Yes, her actually more repugnant actions, even to me, are things with this political overlay to them. However, those are also the ones that immediately polarize everyone and turn it into some kind of retarded "debate" over the social issue involved.

I think this is how she's gotten away with this bullshit. I think a focus on the low-key, seemingly less awful stuff is how you take this bitch down. This is stuff where they can go after her and nobody can really claim "muh social justice warriors" and other bullshit that she hides behind.

Ironically, she's actually in one of those of her own doing in New York on Sunday, apparently. Dumb mall ninja shit.
Her only hot button issue is tranny stuff, she hates the farms cause she legit thought everyone here would just run with it been a troon and enjoy themselves.

She's the newest of newfags and is just bread crumbing all over.

Her defenders self dox from clout chasing or are just 'merely pretending to be retarded' larping faggots.

Are there other political issues or is she just hiding behind tranny hate?

It really just seems to be the one.

Naturally as we just discussed her being female has spared her a ton. I think of how awful I'd be if I was enabled more and am kinda glad my parents injected me with testosterone just so I missed the stage of supreme coddling girls seem to get as children.

I legit do not understand it but honestly yeah all this has always been is just scape glaring a marginalized group.

Seems dunking on trannies has lead to a group of losers who can't do shit thinking they're superior to them and literally acting/larping like Nazis when none of them are even white.
 
I actually disagree, and I have mentioned this particular crime before. People seem to look at it like it's ripping off mattress tags or some similar nonsense, but the Postmaster General does not. This is one of the few actual concrete crimes which is completely unambiguous and if she fucked with the mail in any way, that's a serious crime, and the sort that is actually prosecuted because there are no political implications whatsoever. It's quite simply did you do it? Then you're guilty.
Absolutely. My wording was a bit confusing in that post, and to clarify I meant to say that it’s one of the least interesting/memorable crimes she’s accused of, so I wasn’t sure how relevant my thoughts were to this thread. It’s interesting to me, but I can see the Chris Chan theft/estrogen poisoning/animal abuse etc would be more of a priority.

USPS definitely does not fuck around with mail fraud, and I feel like the wording in the actual law is ambiguous enough that she could potentially be charged, even without having any hard evidence besides her own words. Especially considering the circumstances the theft/obfuscation occurred under. Your point about the public’s ignorance about mail fraud is spot on, perhaps that’s why Bella was willing to discuss it so openly. Not that she seems to have a problem discussing doing any illegal shit, so it probably doesn’t matter. Bella getting a visit from a few OIG agents would be pretty amazing though :optimistic:
 
A thought that struck me while reading through the logs, especially when Bella et al. are doing damage control after the thread was created, is there evidence of conspiracy and/or making false statements/obstruction of justice? I am not a lawyer so forgive me if this is retarded, but I think deliberately making false/misleading statements and trying to coordinate more of the same from others is a crime. I’m sure it depends on Texas laws as well as local police and prosecutors, but there might be something there.
 
We found the person whose ID she stole and we're working on getting in contact with her. She could definitely press charges for identity theft, and if Bella did use her ID for "government filings" and to buy bitcoin, there will be records to cross-reference with the discord logs. If anything, I believe that this has the best chance at actually getting law enforcement involved. That is if glowparents don't step in to protect their gremlin.
Bella using this girl's ID to buy BTC suggests all manner of illegal activity, but the most grievous among these is TAX EVASION.

Comment got eaten by the rollback, but I still think it’s important and relevant. The audit is coming, Bella.
 
USPS definitely does not fuck around with mail fraud, and I feel like the wording in the actual law is ambiguous enough that she could potentially be charged, even without having any hard evidence besides her own words.
Avery would really have to get involved and they'd have to be convinced they could prove it. He's the only one who knows whether or not he got the jury summons, whether he got fined for not showing up, or whether it existed at all. After all, how would she know he even got it unless she had been the one who stole it?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole