Evidence of lawbreaking

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Wyróżnienie
I’m not sure whether this would be criminal, but it seems like intentional property damage, so I‘ll add it.
538698B6-D706-49DA-AD59-CD6C1EF968D3.jpeg
5426AA0C-616C-4B16-9A9F-437CEC22427F.jpeg
Ignore the highlight, accidentally swiped while cropping.

this is from Chess club - Text Channels - book-club [833114738819858432] in the Readable Logs zip.
 
💗Bitchstopher Columbitch💗 powiedział(a):
Yeah, I think so. I might be wrong though.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
No, you're right, she even included a photo (from the ones we already had) of who she thought the victim might be. It's somewhere in the megathread. I'm too wiped out to look tonight but if nobody finds it overnight I'll look tomorrow.
EDIT: Victim's face was obscured in the photo, she had her head down and her hair was covering it.
 

Załączniki

  • dnd1.png
    dnd1.png
    22,1 KB · Wyświetlenia: 677
Genetically Modified Fuck powiedział(a):
No because she talks about buying the thing before this. You said you found nothing, so you are either looking in the wrong logs or not looking.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I looked in these logs:
They're from August 7, but https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-isabella-janke-discord-leaks.97590/ doesn't have anything listed for August 6. There were leaks on August 5 that I didn't look through, though.
 
Regarding two separate and unsubstantiated accusations:
CP
After the leak that dropped today from Zorgoth, I would summarize the main points on this issue, and what we know about them, as so:
  • Zorgoth says something like– Bella claimed to CP online as an admin on 4chan
    • What does this tell us? (Stipulating that Zorgoth is telling the truth)
      • Bella is not afraid of Zorgoth thinking she collects cp; Bella claims to have more influence on 4chan than a random poster may have.
  • Bella frequently posts loli in the discord. She drew a loli image and posted it on her twitter.
    • This demonstrates that she has a loli fetish, which does not in itself prove she consumes irl cp
  • Bella anonymously replied to a loli picture saying it was based and she wanted to see more.
    • Once again, this could just be Bella trying to be edgy, but since we already know she likes loli she was probably somewhat serious.
  • Zorgoth says he thought it was abundantly clear that Bella is a pedo.
    • If liking loli means she is a pedo, then yes. If not, then it is just speculation.
None of these facts prove that Bella has CP (outside of loli). We know that Bella is prone to lying, trying to appear edgy or influential. From what we currently know, cp possession and distribution is just speculation.

Rape/Molestation
  • Allen says that Bella talks about molesting people.
  • Zorgoth says that Bella boasts about taking opportunities to massage someone and using them to smell them or feel them up.
    • Smelling someone is creeping, but not molestation. Feeling them up is obviously molestation though. Still, Bella saying this can be explained away by her trying to appear edgy.
  • Bella makes light of rape and molestation and has alluded to molesting people iirc.
  • There is a rumor that Bella raped her ex-roommate.
There is more credence to the claim that Bella has molested people since I think she stated that in the logs iirc. The problem with these claims is that we haven't had any victims or witnesses come forward with accusations. Without either of the two, there isn't enough proof of misconduct.


If someone hasn't done so yet, we could try reverse-image searching Bella's original loli and other sketches online. Perhaps she has posted the same image on another site like tumblr or deviantart, which would be useful leads.

Feel free to correct anything I got wrong; sometimes it is hard to keep all the facts straight in this shitshow.
 
B589EA13-4573-43CC-8FBC-4F59ADB6BF3A.jpeg

Not a smoking gun…. There’s a LOT of text to read through, but this at least seems to give some credence to Zorgoth’s claim.

From Chess club - Text Channels - inside [826906371546153021] in the Readable Chatlog zip, if people want to find it.
 
Screw Danlon powiedział(a):
Wyświetl załącznik 2433236
Not a smoking gun…. There’s a LOT of text to read through, but this at least seems to give some credence to Zorgoth’s claim.

From Chess club - Text Channels - inside [826906371546153021] in the Readable Chatlog zip, if people want to find it.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
That seems more like a trap she did. She'd post herself as a kid and say cute things, then bait people into going along with her, to the blackmail them or harm them with leaks of what they say. I imagine this because Bella likes to trap people and record, like with Chris Chan.
 
Scrumption powiedział(a):
  • Zorgoth says he thought it was abundantly clear that Bella is a pedo.
    • If liking loli means she is a pedo, then yes. If not, then it is just speculation.
None of these facts prove that Bella has CP (outside of loli). We know that Bella is prone to lying, trying to appear edgy or influential. From what we currently know, cp possession and distribution is just speculation.

Rape/Molestation
  • Allen says that Bella talks about molesting people.
  • Zorgoth says that Bella boasts about taking opportunities to massage someone and using them to smell them or feel them up.
    • Smelling someone is creeping, but not molestation. Feeling them up is obviously molestation though. Still, Bella saying this can be explained away by her trying to appear edgy.
  • Bella makes light of rape and molestation and has alluded to molesting people iirc.
  • There is a rumor that Bella raped her ex-roommate.
There is more credence to the claim that Bella has molested people since I think she stated that in the logs iirc. The problem with these claims is that we haven't had any victims or witnesses come forward with accusations. Without either of the two, there isn't enough proof of misconduct.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Liking loli/shota makes you a pedophile. Being sexually attracted to minors, whether fictitious or real, makes one a pedophile. It takes time invested to produce personal content about children being in sexual situations, especially writing, which can take hours more than drawing for someone who's done art for a long time (which Isabella has). There is substantial effort going into their child fetish--there is no question she is a pedophile. Being a pedophile is not illegal. However, being a child sexual abuser/molester/predator is. It does not mean one has to be sexually interested in real children, nor does it mean that one who's interested in drawn child porn will ever become interested in real children. However, she has talked about an underage college student's genitalia with a friend IRL IIRC. I don't think she actually raped someone. Molesting could be as simple as touching her friend's boob and calling it molestation (quirky teenage girls uwu). There's nothing to prove she actually raped anyone unless her victim (the one who kneed her vag multiple times according to her) comes forward. If someone does, no further evidence would be necessary, as the perpetrator acknowledged her capacity to assault another human being.
 
The Police would probably want nothing to do with her. Her bad hygiene is too potent that the police is gonna wonder if it's worth it to create a specialized prison for super stinky people.
 
AuthenticItalian powiedział(a):
@Alexander Hamilton Would appreciate your input here pimp. How strongly does an app like Discord hold up in the court compared to something like FB. Or when tried they don't care what app you used, moreso about what you said.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

It's not about the app itself, because to even get in as evidence it has to be properly authenticated as you. A lot of weird apps come up, particularly in child sex decoy cases - Kik, for example.

As long as we can prove authenticity to get it in, and then have our computer forensics expert explain how we can be sure it was you that sent the messages - and usually we have a confession from the post-arrest interrogation - in sufficiently clear layman's terms to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt (in cases with a jury), nobody cares what app you personally prefer for soliciting children online.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole