Debate who's really at fault in the UK Grooming Gang scandal.

[Mister Fister]

What you're implying is that Europe would have been better off if the USSR has taken over the UK, Germany and France because the upper classes would have been dealt with and they wouldn't have imported nigger rape gangs.

You are making the case that communism was the better ideology for Europe. Not the far left insanity that took hold but real communism. Don't reply if you're going to have a burger meltdown because you can't tell the different between Stalin and Greta Thunberg.

Considering how Russia treated Germany, they wouldn't have imported the rape gangs.

 

[TayTweets]

Considering how Russia treated Germany, they wouldn't have imported the rape gangs.

The Red Army executed its soldiers for rape in the immediate aftermath of post war occupation, despite what hysterical British authors claimed that became fashionable immediately after WW2 , and given what we know about the British love for rape I'd be skeptical of any moralizing from the British or Germans looking to make the Red Army look bad.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

What you're implying is that Europe would have been better off if the USSR has taken over the UK, Germany and France because the upper classes would have been dealt with and they wouldn't have imported nigger rape gangs.

You are making the case that communism was the better ideology for Europe. Not the far left insanity that took hold but real communism. Don't reply if you're going to have a burger meltdown because you can't tell the different between Stalin and Greta Thunberg.

Honestly I agree. The Soviet Union sadly fell, but the CCP deals with violent Muslims well. Far left/liberal woke freaks in the west moan about "concentration camps" and 1000000 forced sterilisations (if Adrian Zenz's numbers were right, every woman in Xinjiang gets 8 IUDs implanted every day or something insane. Ethnic minorities like Uighurs were actually exempt from the one child policy back in the day so it's an especially odd claim) based on very shaky evidence, but Xinjiang has had problems with East Turkistan terror cells, and now it's a lot better. China detains them and teaches them Mandarin and a trade and turns them into productive citizens who still get to keep their nice little cultural stuff that the Western middle classes enjoy, like kebabs and festivals and funny clothes and their own language, but are integrated and can speak and read the primary language and work a job and follow the laws and conventions of the country. And it works, and it's pretty damn moderate compared to prison or execution (which I'd be fine with for the rapists but not the whole community) or deportation (not that there's anywhere to deport them to, they're native to the area, much like we couldn't deport British converts). A bit like what we were told Prevent was supposed to do.

I kinda figured that was going to be the case, but hell its nice to dream ain't it?

The PM isn't as powerful as a president, he's just the head of the ruling party. Kind of like the majority leader in the US Congress. He can't really do anything unilaterally without the support of the party, though of course the candidates all have their own agendas and if the membership votes for a particular candidate it gives an indication of what the party members want.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

Honestly I agree. The Soviet Union sadly fell, but the CCP deals with violent Muslims well.

Uzbekistan in the early 20th century was like Afghanistan except they speak a Turkic language. Women in Uzbekistan used to wear paranjas (Central Asian burqas) and be confined to their homes. Sex segregation in Uzbek society was so extreme that women and men had to live in separate quarters and women weren't even allowed to meet male non-relatives. The Soviets were able to transform Uzbekistan and other Central Asian countries from being Afghanistan-tier into being... still the 3rd world but at least not basically Afghanistan thanks to the Hujum.

Even as a non-commie, the Stalinists were onto something that Muslim aligned left-wingers and liberals today fail to understand: when dealing with people who want their religious law to be the rule of your land and who think any woman who doesn't dress like a letter box is a whore who's inviting men to have sex with her, you can't keep the kid gloves on. You also shouldn't join hands with them thinking they'll be your best friends forever. They'll turn on you sooner or later just like the islamists turned on their left-wing allies in Iran after the 1979 revolution. Polanski, Mélenchon in France, and every other politician on the left who are currently pandering to Muslims thinking it won't come back to bite them in the ass sooner or later are in for an unpleasant surprise.

 

[>IMPLYING]

Christianity was too Jewish for Hitler's tastes. There's the stuff he published which was the propaganda to keep German Christians obedient, and his own private opinions spoken to trusted men where he wished he and Germany were both Muslim.

The main objection I was raising was how Hitler would explicitly favour Muslims doing their thing today because it's antithetical to his viewpoint. It might be odd to think about, but Hitler actually disliked the idea of wiping out cultures. He didn't want to Germanify the Poles, because he believed doing such a thing was categorically impossible. He would've genocide the Poles (possibly) in much the same way the Turks did the Armenians and Greeks—when forcibly moving them out of German territory into their rump state. Or if you want to look upon him more favourably, his overt 2nd class citizen treatment of them would simply incentivise them to move South into said state of their own accord.


The full quote by the way has Hitler similarly praising the religion of the Japanese (Shinto).

"You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the fatherland as the highest good? The Mohameddan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"

This quote is also sourced by Speer.