UK Britons ordered to remove air conditioning from homes in 40C heat under Net Zero crackdown - Oi Mate! You 'ave a loisence to stay cool?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

The Tories warned that Britain was being left 'in the dark ages' through the 'bonkers' Net Zero drive​

By Dan McDonald
Published: 25/06/2026 - 03:40

Britons have been ordered to remove air conditioning from their homes - despite the country baking in up to 40C heat this week - under a fresh Net Zero crackdown.

Planning officials at councils have told residents to take down their cooling units over concerns about carbon dioxide emissions.

They say AC, despite the heat, should serve only as a "last resort".

The crackdown comes from building regulations which demand "active cooling" is used only after all "passive cooling" methods, like opening windows or running fans, have been exhausted.

The Tories have accused the Government of leaving Britain "in the dark ages" through Net Zero policies which prevent citizens from accessing "modern conveniences that are completely normal in other countries".

Standard guidance says planning consent is not needed for air conditioning in most circumstances.

But permission becomes mandatory in specific scenarios, including properties in conservation areas - with separate regulations applying to flats, leasehold properties, and shared buildings.

This creates situations where units are fitted believing they comply with rules, only for council enforcement teams to turn up and demand their removal.

One Londoner received orders to "permanently remove" two cooling units from the rear of their property, The Telegraph revealed.

Camden Council's planning inspectors determined there was "no justification" for the equipment, ruling it breached the authority's "cooling hierarchy" policy.

During an appeal, the homeowner was advised to open windows and balcony doors in their first-floor flat to achieve ventilation "by natural means".

When the resident raised security concerns in the crime-addled capital, inspectors dismissed these, arguing the risk was not "as great as those associated with ground floor windows" and suggesting windows could remain closed overnight.

Camden inspectors specifically noted "the absence of ceiling fans" in the property, though this was never a stated requirement.

Even after determining the units were "neither intrusive nor harmful" to the neighbourhood's character, officials still demanded they were scrapped.

The homeowner ultimately won on appeal to the Planning Inspectorate by proving their property already featured environmental improvements like solar panels.

Londoners are at greater risk of enforcement action.

The capital's borough councils have incorporated rules derived from Sir Sadiq Khan's "London Plan" into their local planning frameworks.

The Mayor's 2021 strategy notes that "new development in London should also be designed to avoid the need for energy intensive air conditioning systems as much as possible".

Camden's local plan pledges to actively "discourage the use of air conditioning" over concerns it raises "demand for energy" and warms "the local micro-climate".

Islington Council also restricts cooling systems on environmental grounds, saying they "must only be considered as a last resort".

These local policies go above and beyond national building regulations, which merely prioritise "passive cooling" measures like window shading before AC.

Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: "It is totally bonkers for council bureaucrats to block people from installing air conditioning because it uses too much energy.

"This is exactly why we must repeal the mad building regulations that force councils to care more about box-ticking and process than letting people keep their homes cool in the summer.

"We have to get out of this miserabilist Net Zero mindset which says that Britain alone has to stay stuck in the dark ages and can't enjoy the modern conveniences that are completely normal in other countries."

Estimates indicate roughly three per cent of British homes have air conditioning, compared with 90 per cent in America.

The Climate Change Committee has acknowledged the need for cooling systems in care homes, schools and hospitals as temperatures increase, appearing to contradict official Government policy.

Labour failed to amend building regulations last week, saying they reflected "the Government's commitment to improving energy efficiency".

A spokesman for the party said: "Air conditioning units are not banned. They can be installed in both existing and new homes and we expect councils to take a common-sense approach to the rules around this, which are there to manage the interests of communities and the environment.”

A Camden Council spokesman said: “Residents seeking planning permission need to demonstrate that alternative, more climate-friendly measures are not suitable, and that units will not create noise or other harmful impacts on neighbours.

“Enforcement action in these cases is rare and used only as a last resort where this guidance has not been followed.”

Meanwhile, a spokesman for the London Mayor said the policies kept “keep homes cooler without relying on energy-intensive solutions”.

They added: "Local planning decisions are the responsibility of the boroughs, who have their own policies in place”.

Source (Archive)
 
Has Britain ever successfully repealed or rolled back any of it's crazy restrictive laws though?

You now longer have to get the Lord Chamberlain to approve your plays, I believe.

And then turn to genuine environmentalism - stopping the water companies discharging untreated sewage. Executing gyspy fly tippers on the spot, and stopping the countryside being paved over for more immigrant housing and deano boxes

Can we also execute the gypsy cunts who bulldozed ancient hedgerows illegally and squatted?

There’s an element of this story that is under-appreciated. There is no blanket ban on AC nationwide. The building regulations say that passive cooling should be explored first. That regulation then gets interpreted and applied by local councils. If your local council is mostly Reform or Tory, you’re in luck. If however you’re in Camden, this is the local council you voted for:

IMG_6408.jpeg

You can hardly be surprised it will take the stupidest, most doctrinaire position on a matter that affects every ratepayer. It was too busy planning the liberation of Palestine to worry about you slowly cooking to death in your own home.
 
Yeah, if someone told me to do this I'd just tell them to fuck off. If obeying the law means potentially dying of heatstroke, or at least being extremely uncomfortable due to the heat, guess what? I'm not obeying the law.
 
Why does the UK not want nuclear power? is it because the french use it?
Because it obviates the need for bird-murdering windmills and other intermittent, unreliable energy sources the great and good use to farm subsidies. Letting hoi polloi have access to cheap energy is also bad somehow.
 
@northstar747 cheap energy collapses the whole grift.
-it lets people have cheaper travel transport and food.
-it allows us to get heavy industry back, which means the power of the industrial working classes increases.
-it removes all the ways they push freedom restricting things like net zero
- it collapses the entire house of cards built upon net zero and greenwashing,
-it means people will focus away from carbon and to real, genuine environmental concerns like ‘why is our water polluted’ and ‘why are you draining this wetland to build shitty housing for an expanding population.’
Cheap energy would allow us to make people’s lives immeasurably better across every single metric. It would make us an industrial powerhouse and we’d have the energy to be a clean powerhouse as well.
 
br*tish are subhuman cattle and they deserve to not only die out to the brown horde, but do so in sweltering heat. You know, I am starting to like the UK government, they seem to hate their own people almost as much as I do, I mean this is such petty level of disdain. Not like it matters when the population won't do anything about it, LOL!
Why does the UK not want nuclear power? is it because the french use it?
e*ropoors are retards who are scared of nuclear technology. G*rmany and fr*nce are getting rid of all of their nuclear reactors and UK is likely not far behind, and good riddance to that. I want all these brown, shithole countries to die out without as much as running electricity in their houses, they deserve to live in darkness like back in the dark ages, the primitives they brought over from the middle east will feel right at home between this and the current heat wave.
Has Britain ever successfully repealed or rolled back any of it's crazy restrictive laws though?

Like people talk about trying to repeal shit like the surveillance state there, or insanely criminalized speech laws, but is that even realistic at this point? I feel like the opposition railing against this is like the Washington Generals. They bluster a token resistance nobody takes seriously.
You know the difference between the US and br*tards? Americans killed their tyrants, br*toids roll over for them and then cry on the internet at best(for which they get arrested for half the time). Nothing is going to happen and their government knows it, that's why they can get as petty and tyrannical as possible. Oh, I am going to be SO SMUG on the 250th anniversary next week, with a cold beer and a running AC!
But if we can get the nukes started and then somehow start putting heads on spikes we will be grand
Yeah, and maybe I will become the Prince of Ireland and get Todd Howard to release a proper RPG next. Might as well dream big while we're talking about things that will never happen!
 
Why does the UK not want nuclear power? is it because the french use it?

Same reason nuclear power is opposed by brainlets across the West, scientifically illiterate to the point of creationist-tier retarded green lobby that is almost certainly backed by fossil fuel companies. Nuclear power is an existential crisis to peddlers of inefficient energy sources like biofuels, coal, gas-fired plants as well as sellers of scams like wind turbines and solar panels (especially in England of all places).

They spread propaganda and lies about how nuclear power plants could explode like a nuclear bomb, how evil & dangerous radiation is, the supposedly insurmountable amount of waste produced and how every plant is a Chernobyl waiting to happen. All these positions are axiomatically false but that doesn't matter if you scream it loud and often enough.

That and the Simpsons. No joke I think the damage the Simpsons did to nuclear power in the popular zeitgeist is quite significant.

So your typical random on the street, much like America, holds the most absurd and nonsensical fears about nuclear power and therefore opposes it for reasons comparable to religious hysteria and schizophrenic delusion than rational concern.

Unlike America however, which struggles to build nuclear power plants due to the fuckery of private sector, Europe actually dismantles its existing nuclear power plants all in the name of the green cult. Germany and Spain lead the charge of course in dismantling their vital energy infrastructure.

Fact of the matter is all developed countries should have (largely) switched to completely nuclear power decades ago. The fact this was not done is out and out malevolence mixed with total fucking incompetence and will no doubt be condemned by future generations.

The only really valid criticism of nuclear power I suppose is it quite expensive and technically demanding to build, more so than other energy sources. But so is wasting billions on bullshit so... :\

The lack of investment is this field is so significant they can't even build new nuclear plants even if they want to. The UK I believe has one under construction and based on conversations I've had with people about this project it employs literally everyone in the country with the education necessary for such a task, so they couldn't build more than one even if they wanted to. Can't even hire expertise from abroad since the people best at building nuclear power plants are the Russians and Chinese.
 
It's not often I get to feel smug for being Australian, but man.
I guess you don't live in Queensland or South Australia, where all new ducted reverse cycle and split system air conditioners must be DRED-enabled, meaning that the electricity provider has the ability to turn your ac off and on from remote.

It won't be long until it will be compulsory in all states and territories, and homeowners won't be allowed to install a new AC unless they have a smart meter installed in order to allow the electricity supplier to use DRED... and you won't be able to opt out either.

Even once I'm eventually bullied into installing a smart meter like good niggercattle, there's no way those cunts are taking my old-timey window rattlers. I have a couple of spares tucked away, as I know the sale of new box AC units that plug into a standard 10A or 15A GPO will eventually be outlawed.
 
The tyranny of our government is the petty, feminine tyranny of an emotionally abusive mother. I'd prefer violent repression over this shit.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep; his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” - C. S. Lewis

Isn't it funny how "environmentalism" never seems to give us more freedom; only less. "Environmentalism" is never farms and front lawns and lots of trees and hunting for wild game; it's just more massive cities full of people who don't speak your language and glass boxes in the sky conforming to more and more Brutalist Soviet architecture.
 
That and the Simpsons. No joke I think the damage the Simpsons did to nuclear power in the popular zeitgeist is quite significant.
Imagine having your nuclear power plants shut down because your country is retarded enough to take an American cartoon seriously. God, e*ropoors are way overdue for their bullying.
Isn't it funny how "environmentalism" never seems to give us more freedom; only less
There will always be retarded ideologies, but it's funny when a large contingent of e*rope is dumb enough to fall for it, lmfao. Hey, I guess getting a heat stroke because your dumbass can't own an AC unit will somehow save the planet, you never know!
 
This is so violently retarded that it could only happen in the third world caliphate known as Great Britain. Enjoy more dead elderly people because that's what is going to happen.
 
Why does the UK not want nuclear power? is it because the french use it?
They're actually building four reactors at the moment, two at Hinkley Point C and two at Sizewell C, total of 6.4 GW, which is a little more than their current operational fleet. Also, they're EPRs built by EDF/Framatome, so it's not against the French. Obviously they'd need a whole lot more, but at the moment nobody really commits to series production of large reactors. Especially EPRs have had a track record of delays and cost overruns (apart from the plant they built in China) so people are apprehensive about going all in on those, when the EPR 2 is supposed to be coming as well, promising cost reductions.
Thing is, not producing these reactors in proper amounts is why they're so expensive. I know first hand what a clusterfuck the engineering is on HPC. Not that it's bad or shoddy, the opposite is true. But HPC is far from the first EPR built, but they have to basically re-do all the conventional instrumentation for every single reactor because regulations are ever so slightly different everywhere. Every EPR is basically a FOIK unit, and I'm sure there are gonna be huge differences between Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C despite there being no need for that. It is horrendous, and it's basically a self-propagating issue. Reactor takes a long time and is expensive, people delay and cancel orders, making said reactors take more time and be more expensive.
Btw, there's also plans for Rolls Royce to build their first SMR in Wales, and the Bongistanian gummint supported the U-Battery micro-SMR project. They're far from being really against nuclear power, they still have nine reactors running. Those are old AGRs which will be phased out and basically more than replaced by the four EPRs under construction, but the government also targets something like 24GW of nuclear capacity by 2050. Which is not a huge amount, but a significant chunk of the UK power grid. They're also pretty keen on getting SMR tech licensed and running, which could be a nice addition to the large scale reactors.
But, having seen the British bureaucracy at work with nuclear power, these plans could very well fall flat.
 
I bet that if refugees started complaining about not being able to rape white women in peace in that heat the mayor himself would install their AC units.
 
I genuinely consider refrigeration systems the greatest invention of mankind and you can pry my AC out of my, very cold, dead hands. Even over my guns and free speech.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole