BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE BIG LEAGUE B

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lazuli powiedział(a):
Christopher Loffrado "Chris" Hayes (/heɪz/; born February 28, 1979)[1][2] is an American political commentator, journalist, and author. Hayes hosts All In with Chris Hayes, a weekday news and opinion television show on MSNBC. Hayes formerly hosted a weekend MSNBC show, Up with Chris Hayes. He remains an editor at large of The Nation magazine.[3]


Cable news
Hayes guest-hosted The Rachel Maddow Show in July 2010, while Maddow was traveling in Afghanistan and often filled in for Maddow when she was absent. Hayes has also hosted other MSNBC shows such as The Ed Show, Countdown With Keith Olbermann, and The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell.[10]

On November 5, 2010, MSNBC announced that Hayes would be filling in for Keith Olbermann during Olbermann's suspension. However, the network later backtracked after finding out that Hayes had also made political contributions—the issue over which Olbermann was being suspended.[15]

Hayes credits Maddow with his becoming a host at MSNBC, saying, "I absolutely would not be doing this if it weren't for her."[3]

Up with Chris Hayes
On August 1, 2011, MSNBC announced that Hayes would host a two-hour morning show on Saturdays and Sundays, each going into depth on current issues.[16] The first airing of Up with Chris Hayes was September 17, 2011,[17] and featured a live interview with former speaker and current House minority leader Nancy Pelosi.

All In with Chris Hayes
On March 14, 2013, MSNBC announced that Hayes would take over the time slot formerly hosted by Ed Schultz who would move to the weekends. At 34 years old, he became the youngest host of a prime-time show on any of the country's major cable news channels.[25]

All In with Chris Hayes, Hayes's first prime-time show, premiered Monday, April 1, 2013.[27]
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Fun fact: rapper Immortal Technique used to beat up him and Lin-Manuel-Miranda back in high school lmao
 
I actually said "Ugh, fucking GamerGate" when I read the OP. Why do people keep trying to prop up this dead horse?

Also, it never fails to amuse me that the people who are super into GamerGate (pro or anti) assume that everyone else knows what it is, when in reality it's never had mainstream exposure. The majority of people have never heard of GamerGate, nor would they care about it if they did hear about it.
 
So... let's see here...

"Clinton has a 90% + chance of beating Trump."
"Pepe the Frog is a symbol of Hate."
"GamerGate now runs the country."

KEEP SWINGING FOR THEM FENCES, FELLAS!

Also, keep in mind this is a journalist (*snrk* ) from MSNBC, who has gone on record wishing they could have news shows like the Daily Show. I shit you not.


"Journalism."
 
melty powiedział(a):
Who is this person and why do we give a shit anyway? Sorry I don't follow fake news

Can you explain who this journalist is and why people care about his opinions? Because right now, I don't.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Three assholes in particular from the Wall Street Journal: Rolfe Winkler, Jack Nicas, and Ben Fritz.

Nobody cared about their stupid opinions, and they're overglorified bloggers.

Nobody, that is, except the same idiots who were responsible for Gamergate happening in the first place back in 2014. Said individuals proceeded to signal boost this original article like crazy despite the fact that it was mostly out-of-context clips and basically an attack piece. It's not the first time they've done this.

A lot of familiar faces from Anti-GG showed up to help push this forward, such as Aja Romano, Ben Kuchera, Patrick Klepak, Fruzsina Eordogh, Rich Stanton, and Tom Philips, just to name a few, to say nothing of the huge amount of lolcows we cover that first emerged from GG's opposition who came out to throw their support behind this shit like Brianna Wu, Bob Chipman, Dan Olson, and more.

GG was a fight they lost, but they held literally every single card at the start, including support of the mainstream press and associates on every major Social Media network willing to manipulate shit on their behalf, from friendly mods shadowbanning people en masse on reddit to shit being mass-deleted off 4chan of all places, so you could at least see why they thought they could win against the neckbeards.

This time though, they not only don't have the resources they used to, but they've picked a fight with a target that is infinitely larger than GG ever was. Not only this, but it has the support of basically every single group that ever fought with this same bunch of idiots (and since GG was three years ago, that covers a lot of ground), so many of those pushing this idiocy are people with established histories of being sensationalist pricks.

Them losing on this is a foregone conclusion, and I have no fucking idea why any of them thought this shit would work.
 
Jaimas powiedział(a):
There's not a lot to say. I can't make this any funnier than it already is.

What you're seeing is the last Autisitc shrieking by mostly the same fucks that started this shit in the first place and are now dwelling in pants-shitting terror that they're in for a redux of what happened last time. Proof that certain people can't touch a hot pan and realize it's scalding until they've burned their flesh off repeatedly, I suppose.

Once again, a bunch of exceptional self-proclaimed "journalists" decided they were going to run a hit piece on someone who didn't give a fuck and would've been content to be left alone, but they decided to make an enemy of them anyway and are shocked, shocked I tells ya, when that target refuses to knuckle under. Unlike last time, however, it's not just neckbeards who they pissed off with this; they went after someone with an audience of millions, who, in turn, has the backing of other big names with audiences of millions as well.

So now we get to sit back, break out the Johnny Walker (BLUE LABEL, BABY!), and watch irony run its course.

Hope you guys are in for a laugh, because this slow-motion trainwreck is going to be a fucking delight.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Jaimas powiedział(a):
Three assholes in particular from the Wall Street Journal: Rolfe Winkler, Jack Nicas, and Ben Fritz.

Nobody cared about their stupid opinions, and they're overglorified bloggers.

Nobody, that is, except the same idiots who were responsible for Gamergate happening in the first place back in 2014. Said individuals proceeded to signal boost this original article like crazy despite the fact that it was mostly out-of-context clips and basically an attack piece. It's not the first time they've done this.

A lot of familiar faces from Anti-GG showed up to help push this forward, such as Aja Romano, Ben Kuchera, Patrick Klepak, Fruzsina Eordogh, Rich Stanton, and Tom Philips, just to name a few, to say nothing of the huge amount of lolcows we cover that first emerged from GG's opposition who came out to throw their support behind this shit like Brianna Wu, Bob Chipman, Dan Olson, and more.

GG was a fight they lost, but they held literally every single card at the start, including support of the mainstream press and associates on every major Social Media network willing to manipulate shit on their behalf, from friendly mods shadowbanning people en masse on reddit to shit being mass-deleted off 4chan of all places, so you could at least see why they thought they could win against the neckbeards.

This time though, they not only don't have the resources they used to, but they've picked a fight with a target that is infinitely larger than GG ever was. Not only this, but it has the support of basically every single group that ever fought with this same bunch of idiots (and since GG was three years ago, that covers a lot of ground), so many of those pushing this idiocy are people with established histories of being sensationalist pricks.

Them losing on this is a foregone conclusion, and I have no fucking idea why any of them thought this shit would work.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
When you say this fight are you talking about Trump or PewDiePie? How are they losing, didnt Disney ditch PewDiePie?
 
DragoonSierra powiedział(a):
When you say this fight are you talking about Trump or PewDiePie? How are they losing, didnt Disney ditch PewDiePie?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Pewdiepie.

He is sitting on fucking millions, and like Notch, has zero reason to give a fuck about them pulling out, even if it cost him financially.

Even if he lost all his sponsorships (which he won't, he has an audience in the fucking tens of millions), he could afford to give zero fucks about anyone involved and take home a six-figure salary from investment interest alone. They hate him for it, but there's really not a hell of a lot they can do to the guy financially.

As for why this was a dumb move? Let me give some numbers.

GG, at around 2015, consisted of maybe, by my estimates, around 100,000 spergs across various platforms. KIA had over 25,000 alone during GG's heydey and has over 3 times that number now. With those numbers, they did 7 million dollars in damages to Gawker (that the company will even admit), got the FTC involved with several major gaming websites over disclosure guidelines, chased a huge number of alleged journalists out of their comfy platforms and into places with a substantially smaller audience, gave the people responsible a black eye, and brought countless lolcows out of the woodwork for us to mock and derive amusement from.

So the same idiots, proving they learned absolutely nothing, just went after someone with an audience, conservatively, around 500 times GG's size.

This is going to be fucking hilarious. Mark my words.
 
Jaimas powiedział(a):
Pewdiepie.

He is sitting on fucking millions, and like Notch, has zero reason to give a fuck about them pulling out, even if it cost him financially.

Even if he lost all his sponsorships (which he won't, he has an audience in the fucking tens of millions), he could afford to give zero fucks about anyone involved and take home a six-figure salary from investment interest alone. They hate him for it, but there's really not a hell of a lot they can do to the guy financially.

As for why this was a dumb move? Let me give some numbers.

GG, at around 2015, consisted of maybe, by my estimates, around 100,000 spergs across various platforms. KIA had over 25,000 alone during GG's heydey and has over 3 times that number now. With those numbers, they did 7 million dollars in damages to Gawker (that the company will even admit), got the FTC involved with several major gaming websites over disclosure guidelines, chased a huge number of alleged journalists out of their comfy platforms and into places with a substantially smaller audience, gave the people responsible a black eye, and brought countless lolcows out of the woodwork for us to mock and derive amusement from.

So the same idiots, proving they learned absolutely nothing, just went after someone with an audience, conservatively, around 500 times GG's size.

This is going to be fucking hilarious. Mark my words.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Were the guys at the WSJ who wrote the original article involved with Anti-GG at all?
 
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole