African-American Appreciation Thread - Not Actually an Appreciation Thread

[Dean Pentel]

Hey! Love is love, dammit!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bQsiCi9X0Qs

What's with this nigger's lips? Was he in there eating bees or something?

 

[Sean Andalou]

What's with this nigger's lips? Was he in there eating bees or something?

Ooooh! A new racist epithet just dropped.

Bee eater.

 

[Sicko Hunter]

When black people are ~15% of the population, they are responsible for half of the murders. The bulk of the map you showed is in the up-to-10% range, not the "90% white people with 1 or 2 blacks visible per month" range. I was pointing out that the darker spots on that map are just where there's TONS of blacks, but you only need a small % to face a serious risk to your safety.

My larger point is that I would prefer my society address the issue we're running from, not consider running and hiding from it some sort of win. Yes, you can move away from blacks if you have money to do so. There are plenty of small towns, but many whites don't have money or wishes to live in small towns. And I want to live in a society where they don't have to flee black retards in the first place.

Even without the violence, you're paying for them. You're forced to send your kids to school with them. It seems we can't even teach useful thought exercises like analogies because blacks aren't smart enough. How many blacks in a school district do you think you need for them to change curricula to be one-size-fits-all, even without blacks in your kid's school? How far can you truly run from "no child left behind?"

I also don't want to live around people who have your mindset, either, to be fair. But perhaps we aren't in disagreement on the larger issue.

Anyway, my point was just that many of even the lighter places are on the cusp of being seriously affected by the looming problem. And the "gray spot" you referenced sure looks like the 15% slot I am talking about.

Sure, New Orleans is hell on Earth, but that doesn't mean the surrounding areas are paradise. Blacks concentrated in one area are free to travel and rob you, which they frequently do.

You don't have to flee to a small town to escape blacks. You don't have to abandon society. The majority (62%) of all US counties has 5% or less blacks. I don't know what message you thought I was trying to preach here but it was never "Whites should all run into the hills to hide from blacks!" which is ironically your own strawman. There are about 2000 counties to chose from all over the US. I believe people living in black majority or black heavy counties should move out of them yes. I am not urging whites to flee from their homes or anything like that.

 

[byron]

White woman harassed by an orc on a train.

0:44

https://x.com/WhiteGirl1776/status/2069460875312808067

Paul Joseph Watson documents some of public transport terrors in Europe. The last video shows a guy licking a taxi window. Fucking terrifying!

 

[Lord Of Shit]

He seems nice. What was he charged with?

Something relating to theft of vibranium, I think.

Virtue signaling (and perhaps a pretext for some sort of official misconduct) that will never appeal to his primary constituency.

It is extraordinarily difficult for even the highly-intelligent to navigate the life-ruinous shoals of the Social Justice Archipelago! What chance has a chimpanzee in a stolen suit?

 

[Lord Of Shit]

What's with this nigger's lips? Was he in there eating bees or something?

So, apparently ChatGPT is fine with "a black man stealing and eating bees from a hive":



...but "a black man stealing and eating bees from a hive in a Japanese woodblock-print style" violates their content policies.

...BUT "a white man stealing and eating bees from a hive in a Japanese woodblock-print style"? We gotchu, fam:

 

[Sicko Hunter]

Recap of some coonery on Juneteenth. Also how fitting is it that they take a day that is supposed to be celebrating freedom from slavery and use it to riot?

2:50

 

[Lord Of Shit]

Recap of some coonery on Juneteenth. Also how fitting is it that they take a day that is supposed to be celebrating freedom from slavery and use it to riot?
Juneteenth.mp4

Those darn "teens" again...

Ruining Juneniggereenth!

 

[drfuzzyballs]

Recap of some coonery on Juneteenth. Also how fitting is it that they take a day that is supposed to be celebrating freedom from slavery and use it to riot?
Juneteenth.mp4

The first time I ever even heard of Juneteenth was around 2005 when I was a little kid watching the local news reporting on a Milwaukee Juneteenth celebration that devolved into a small riot with helicopter footage of a man being beaten down. I went on with the next decade of my life never even hearing about it until Joe Biden decided to make it a government holiday.

 

[Lord Of Shit]

The first time I ever even heard of Juneteenth was around 2005 when I was a little kid watching the local news reporting on a Milwaukee Juneteenth celebration that devolved into a small riot with helicopter footage of a man being beaten down. I went on with the next decade of my life never even hearing about it until Joe Biden decided to make it a government holiday.

In Biden's defence, he thought that "Juneteenth" was just a flavour of ice cream, an easy mistake to make when your brains are about the same consistency as that of said ice cream on a hot, mid-June day.

 

[Palmfish]

Spoiler: large ass video i cant downsize, safe for work

0:35

here's a negroid baby playing fortnite, i guess. via twitter.

 

[Twix Eatr]

0:25

I hate them more and more each day.

1:43

Ugh.

 

[Sicko Hunter]

Black Suckerpunch Obv.mp4
I hate them more and more each day.

WhiteDudesWsTM___-_A_White_man_named_Mark_Foraker_recently_went_viral_after_using_the_ha_FTTybN.mp4
Ugh.

Liberals believe that "racism" (acknowledging differences in the races) comes from skin color. This is where it actually comes from. Interactions like this create "racists".

 

[Twix Eatr]

A friend of mine recently indicated that he believed the issue was indeed skin color. As in, everybody is basically the same and it's so silly to hate people due to different skin. I didn't even know people still thought that's what the issue was. Ugh, fucking tabula rasa!

 

[Lord Of Shit]

Interactions like this create "racists".

Call it "lived experience".

Wokies hate it when you appropriate their shibboleths.

 

[BingBongDingDong]

BUT "a white man stealing and eating bees from a hive in a Japanese woodblock-print style"? We gotchu, fam:

Protip: make the picture you want with a white guy, then send the finished product telling your ai of choice to make them black. It works 90% of the time.


Edit: took a minute to make it more black and less vitiligo

 

[Lord Of Shit]

Protip: make the picture you want with a white guy, then send the finished product telling your ai of choice to make them black. It works 90% of the time.
Wyświetl załącznik 9185548

Edit: took a minute to make it more black and less vitiligo
Wyświetl załącznik 9185558

Not bad at all, and thanks for the tips. Now all I have to do is fix the text at the upper-left labeling the thief as a "Westerner".

...wait, considering the state of Europe these days, maybe I'll just leave it as-is. Or add some text at the bottom reading:

DIS NIGGA EATIN' BEES!

I'll get this AI thing yet.

 

[Mr. Suction]

Because having a gun for protection is different than going back and killing someone? She didn't "suddenly" try to protect him, either. She was always avoidant of this outcome, which is why she didn't tell her husband and made Juanita promise not to tell hers, either.

What kind of wignat retardation is this? She grabbed the gun because she supposedly was in danger. She was supposedly getting sexually assaulted. You were meant to use that purportedly superior non-nigger intelligence quotient to have the reading comprehension to infer that I was casting doubt on her version of events by noticing how weird it is that she was responding to a actively threatening hominid by trying to arm herself, but then later just decided to forgive all of that and take steps to allow said hominid to escape punishment by refusing to confirm his identity. Suddenly she wasn't interested in dis-incentivizing his behavior, and possible return, via: letting him get beaten, or ending the possibility outright by letting her relatives end his life. Do you think she retrieved the gun just for shits 'n giggles? This actually makes sense to you?

The only way that might make sense-assuming all of it is true-is if her motivation for vouching for Emmett's innocence was a desire to avoid legal consequences for what had happened-because by then, kidnapping was already a done deed-and/or would have happened. But then one would have to wonder why that never seemed to be a consideration for Roy and J.W., or the perpetrators of every other lynching in the history of the Jim Crow U.S. South. She could have affirmed Emmett was the molester, but then request that they take Emmett to a police station/sheriff's office, where they could press charges for sexual assault. The impromptu vigilante abduction they would have to admit to would be a problem, maybe, but I think that would've been entirely overlooked in Mississippi. Easiest shit ever. But they didn't do that. So the innocence proclamation doesn't make sense.

Why would she make up such a backstory in the store if all that happened was him whistling to her in the moment?

Because her husband and brother-in-law were at risk of going to jail for murder; what better way to make them seem sympathetic to the public, and secure an acqutittal, than to concoct a story where their lynching was actually a just defense of an innocent White woman from a filthy nigger beast?


More on this later.

Emmett just peacefully bought candy, was snatched out of the store by another black (for no reason), and this evil white lady and her evil husband (who were one of the few places to serve blacks, mind you) cooked up some bullshit to kill one of them?

Emmett getting dragged out of the store, and the molestation. is Carolyn's-I'm putting into bold font in mockery of your sensitivity to me not spelling it in full-account only. Everyone else who was in or around the store saw and/or heard no such thing.


From pages 43 and 44 of the FBI's 2006 report. There's your "primary source", dumbass. Due to your lack of decent reading comprehension skills, I'll also explicitly state I trust them over Carolyn Bryant, if for no other reason than numbers and corroborating witnesses and/or listeners vs. Carolyn's army of...no one being the better logical bet. You'll just have to chud-rage about that. Additionally, that "flippantly dismiss" clause in my previous post was anticipation of you coping and claiming they're all automatically liars because they're niggers and/or one or more other reasons.

Michael Whelan, a psychologist who grew up in Sumner and walked past the 1955 Till trial on the way to school, said he can’t imagine a 14-year-old Black youth from Chicago being dragged off by rednecks in the middle of the night and being unafraid.

Oh, interesting. Because I can link you to entire YouTube channels filled with these faggots daring armed police officers with their guns aimed at them to shoot them because they're not scared at all.

Anecdata at best. And even if it weren't, that alone doesn't confer a 100% chance of Emmett being an attempted rapist. That, and Jim Crow-era niggers are significantly better-behaved than modern "inner city youth" niggers for a variety of reasons, like living under White man's boot, and not having easy access to hard drugs from the glowies, to name a few.

She didn't hear anything per Carolyn's statements because she was cooking and had the T.V. up while shuffling around in the kitchen.

Yeah you're pulling this out of your ass. There's nothing about this on page 42 of the FBI report:



Before you you take a fat hit from a copium pack, balk at censorship, and try to to claim this isn't Juanita being quoted, let me show you a news report, from a journalist who retrieved a less-censored version, likely via a F.O.I.A. request:
I dunno, man, I'm not seeing anything about an active T.V. or loud kettle. Unless you're ready to admit the distracting paraphernalia excuse is just a contrived cope.

What's funny is how you selectively decide which testimony and who is giving it to consider worthwhile. Like who the fuck are these other men who claim to have been abducted by Roy? What verification is there that they're being truthful? Why do you take the narrative set forth to you at face value, despite the fact these same people will tell you men are women or that blacks aren't disproportionately violent?

You're doing the same thing, dumbass. Zero fucking corroboration on Emmett molesting Carolyn, or hearing any screams, but you apparently believe her anyway. Despite the fact that she has the massive incentive of stopping her husband and brother-in-law from going to jail via trying to portray them as righteous crusaders against the nigger menace. That's why it's oh-so-convenient that Emmett's initial offense was "talking" and "insulting", but then changed to sexual assault come time for Carolyn to testify in court:

You're retarded if this doesn't rouse even a modicum of suspicion in you. William Huie's the same man who wrote the Look article designed to exploit Roy and J.W.'s double jeopardy immunity to protect the other murderers, mind you. He'll help protect the family, and other lynchers, in publication-chasing that bag!-; but he'll express private doubts on the testimonies of the people he was supposedly trying to help. Curious, that. I've already established how retarded it is Carolyn to forgive and protect her supposed attempted rapist, which is why it'd be retarded for you to assert that this sugar-coated account of hers that she's been previously telling everyone-the one that omits the molestation-was just her trying to protect Emmett.

While I'm at it, I'll also feature pages 51 and 52 of the FBI report:



Ever heard the term "Bury the Lede"? A major reason I kept calling Carolyn's account contradictory is because it has a bunch of buried ledes that are suspiciously absent in her earliest claims, but then they suddenly appear at, and after, the trial, and change things significantly. Her adding the supposed scream, for example. Here, we have J.W. naming Emmett based on his supposed worst act in the store: "Talking". Not "groping". Not "molesting". Not "raping". Not "putting his hands on her waist."

"Talking."

This is textbook buried lede. Mind you, he already walked into the cabin, without invitation, with a flashlight and gun, so you're retarded if you try to claim this was J.W. performing a feint of innocence meant to lower everyone's guard.

You haven't established Juanita knows anything to deny anything. And there has never been any confirmation that any woman was in the truck, only that someone they couldn't see spoke in a softer voice, not even a woman's.

Luckily I have the FBI to report on that, page 48:

For when you once again puff that copium joint because the names are censored: The FBI agent involved, Dale Killinger, removes all doubt.

Oh shit, man. Looks like she was with them there after all! Makes sense, anyway. Think about it: At Wright's house, Roy and J.W. bring Emmett to the truck where they audibly asked someone if Emmett was the right nigger. Whoever answered, answered "Yes.", and this apparently satisfied them, which prompted them to drive off. Even if I grant you that Wright might have misjudged the sex of the person who spoke, the remaining story says that the truck riders went back to the grocery store for yet further confirmation from Carolyn. Even though the judgement used to toss the previous nigger out of the truck was apparently good enough, or else we'd read he was brought back to the store, too. Hmmm. How interesting. How revealing.

I'm also curious what kind of innocent talking you think Emmett did to where he knew what they were talking about when they picked him up?

Nothing worth a lynching, I'm sure. Go ahead, jackass, try to contest this.

Why is it that Emmett didn't seem too surprised at them coming to get him? Why did Mose immediately understand it was Emmett who'd done something? If Carolyn was in the car identifying Emmett at Mose's, why did they then bring Emmett to the store for identification from Carolyn?

Moses elaborate on this at trial, page 150 of the FBI PDF (I specify the FBI PDF because the actual page is misleading to make it look like it's actually page 36):
This isn't that hard to believe; there were plenty of witnesses to the outdoors whistle and car speeding away, and we both know how Roy Bryant found-out about whatever happened, so it shouldn't be too much of a stretch to think that gossip would have brought this knowledge to Moses via osmosis. Is this an attempt at poking holes into his story? At least Moses' makes sense at a surface level




This whole spat is stupid, anyway. In a he-said-she-said scenario, it makes sense to trust the account with less contradictions, less suspiciously buried ledes, and more corroborating members. In this case, that means Till and Co. But you're a retarded wignat so you'll believe Carolyn no matter what. For what's it's worth, I apply the same standard to Timothy Tyson, which is why up until now I haven't mentioned him or the supposed recanting at all. Maybe he was telling the truth, but the lack of real evidence, and the constant excuses for why there wasn't an audio recording and/or transcript, make me doubt him. Plus it was Carolyn and Martha Donham vs. him; simple numbers.

 

[Twix Eatr]

Your entire argument is based on the third-party reporting of what allegedly happened, which is what I requested you not do. Even your "source material" does this. Your whole argument amounts to "obviously these blacks are telling the truth and this white woman is lying!"

Nothing worth a lynching, I'm sure. Go ahead, jackass, try to contest this.

So no answer? Interesting. Even in your own retarded version of events, you have to gloss over that something more than the whistle absolutely happened, they knew about it, and it wasn't good. It wasn't even a lynching when black men were involved in the murder, but you seem to be stuck on this anti-white make-believe shit.

LOL, even Mose knew it was something bad, but you gloss over this, too. How do you even think that page helps your case? You don't think the blacks absolutely did dare him to go hit on the white lady since he was talking like he fucked white women before? And then because he did it, they knew he was guilty of whatever the white woman said he did?

Gee, is that perhaps their motive for denying everything, because they got their cousin Bobo killed by daring him to do some stupid shit he never should've tried? Why don't you think Mose said, "I talked to him about it. He didn't know he wasn't supposed to just whistle at a white woman" if that's all that happened? Blacks were allowed in the store. Blacks were allowed to talk to the white owner. They primarily sold to blacks, so this is normal. So what kind of "talking" would he have done that violated this code they were all supposed to know about? And why do you think that kind of "talking" (which isn't a whistle) stops short of what Carolyn claims happened?

Why is it that Mose seems to understand the white men who came for him only believed he done some talking, but Mose indicates it was something else with how Emmett had "done something." Even in your story where Carolyn made the whole thing up to get out of working at the store, and had indicated Emmett was the correct one, isn't it interesting she picked the right boy who'd absolutely "done something" more than talking that wasn't whistling?

Oh shit, man. Looks like she was with them there after all! Makes sense, anyway. Think about it: At Wright's house, Roy and J.W. bring Emmett to the truck where they audibly asked someone if Emmett was the right nigger. Whoever answered, answered "Yes.", and this apparently satisfied them, which prompted them to drive off. Even if I grant you that Wright might have misjudged the sex of the person who spoke, the remaining story says that the truck riders went back to the grocery store for yet further confirmation from Carolyn. Even though the judgement used to toss the previous nigger out of the truck was apparently good enough, or else we'd read he was brought back to the store, too. Hmmm. How interesting. How revealing.

50 years later, some retarded blacks swore they were just about to be the next Emmett Till. Yes, let's believe them. You are reliant on glossing over certain details, adding in others on flimsy evidence, and more retarded assumptions. Mose never said the person was a male or a female, you retarded simping faggot, and this doesn't "reveal" anything that one of the blacks who knew Emmett was some out-of-town Chicago kid and kin of Mose wouldn't. Why wouldn't Roy grab the black who actually notified him of the incident or saw it himself? Per Carolyn, when she went out to grab the pistol, a black had told her she should go inside and lock up. He said he didn't know who Emmett was, but clearly saw him.

Ever heard the term "Bury the Lede"? A major reason I kept calling Carolyn's account contradictory is because it has a bunch of buried ledes that are suspiciously absent in her earliest claims, but then they suddenly appear at, and after, the trial, and change things significantly. Her adding the supposed scream, for example. Here, we have J.W. naming Emmett based on his supposed worst act in the store: "Talking". Not "groping". Not "molesting". Not "raping". Not "putting his hands on her waist."

"Talking."

This is textbook buried lede. Mind you, he already walked into the cabin, without invitation, with a flashlight and gun, so you're retarded if you try to claim this was J.W. performing a feint of innocence meant to lower everyone's guard.

This is an interesting way to avoid the fact you don't know what the fuck a contradiction is. That isn't even "burying the lede", either. Again, unless you have two different values for the same variable, it's not a contradiction. You only apply this toward Carolyn, not anybody else. You have yet to post a contradiction. Nothing changes if she does or doesn't mention she yelled once for Juanita. It's only elevated in your mind because you already have the conclusion she's a liar. But it's just evidence to anyone not retarded that she's just being forthcoming and not worried about extremely minor discrepancies. It's a sign of honesty to those of us who don't capitalize "black" and lowercase "white."

Nobody has said he was feigning innocence, but yes, lowering people's guard if he knew Emmett had done more is reasonable. Why wouldn't you want them to believe you're only going to whip Emmett's ass for talking? Now imagine the "talking" was actually him telling her he'd fucked white women before. And that's enough to make Roy beat the dog shit out of Emmett. And Carolyn understands this, but she doesn't want Emmett to die. So maybe she downplays it. You apparently have never met a woman or interacted with one before since you seem to think if she grabs a pistol for protection, she must want to facilitate his murder for kicks, too. This is retarded. But imagine in the course of beating his ass, Emmett admits he groped her and wouldn't let her go because he thinks he already knows. Now Roy realizes he basically let his woman get molested by this black and has to do more. Sorry, but party's over for you, Emmett.

But this is just me speculating for funsies since that's literally all your post is. In reality, he probably already knew that part and they planned to murder him since they threatened to kill Mose if he told on them.

In a he-said-she-said scenario, it makes sense to trust the account with less contradictions, less suspiciously buried ledes, and more corroborating members. In this case, that means Till and Co.

lmao

Every single aspect of this case fits together perfectly with Emmett doing exactly what she said he did. To think otherwise requires all of the leaps you're doing where you quote "contradictions" that aren't even close to the meaning. "Ah HA! Why didn't her lawyer's note scribbled on a napkin mention she yelled out prior? CONTRADICTION!"

The simple answer is that some black retard from out-of-town thought it'd be fine to grope a white woman. He found out whites don't have the same sense of humor. Roy's idea of "dark humor" is more the Kramer stand-up routine than the Bill Cosby act.

But the interracial rape stats is probably more evidence in your mind that white women just really, really, really love to lie about these dindus.

 

[The Jewel of the Nile]

In Biden's defence, he thought that "Juneteenth" was just a flavour of ice cream, an easy mistake to make when your brains are about the same consistency as that of said ice cream on a hot, mid-June day.

First niggeroni, now nigg-cream, Fatrick can't keep getting away with this