8/6/21 Tommy Hates the Catholics

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I thought the red man didnt have the concept of landed property. Notwithstanding the 20000 years of ethnic cleansing, mass enslavement, genocide, and colonial settler imperialism they waged on each other competing for territory before the white man showed up.

See faggots like Tommy like to believe the Injun was innocent of all that white supremacist behavior, but in reality the only difference between the red man and the white was that the white man's civilization was so much more advanced that he defeated the red man for good all over the continent, while no Injun tribe was ever advanced enough to do that to all the other tribes.
 
Spoken like a privileged white man descended of predator capitalists. Got any proof of your wild claim or do you just like to state your opinions as if they're fact?

have you got any special plans to save yourself when the grid goes down and doesn't come back up, misinformed millennial mental midget? better still, have you got a rational argument for me or is the best you have an ad hominem slur followed on with a straw man?
What’s your opinion on Eastern Orthodoxy?
 
I thought the red man didnt have the concept of landed property. Notwithstanding the 20000 years of ethnic cleansing, mass enslavement, genocide, and colonial settler imperialism they waged on each other competing for territory before the white man showed up.

See faggots like Tommy like to believe the Injun was innocent of all that white supremacist behavior, but in reality the only difference between the red man and the white was that the white man's civilization was so much more advanced that he defeated the red man for good all over the continent, while no Injun tribe was ever advanced enough to do that to all the other tribes.

Yup. Unlike what hippies and hustlers (Native Americans” who might be 1/4 actually native if lucky) life in pre-Columbian America wasn’t some paradise-like heaven of “life in balance with nature”.

Species were hunted to extinction, and life was short, brutal and as many sites have shown often involved constant tribal warfare.

And that’s even without dwelling on the barbaric human sacrifices (including children) that took place in Central and South America.

Whatever atrocities catholic missionaries may have been behind (and sure: They weren’t always the nicest bunch) it completely pales when compared to some of the religious practices of the locals: Cutting a man’s chest open and tearing out his still beating heart.

Or the Incan way. Taking drugged children to the top of a mountain and let them die of exposure and dehydration.


What’s your opinion on Eastern Orthodoxy?

That’s like asking a dog about Nietsche, lol!
 
LOLOLOL!

“Sounds like a privileged white man!”

Said the privileged white man!
i'm only white passing and my whiteness is almost certainly the result of rape. also, my privilege was not earned by predator capitalists and I'm not male. have you got a rational argument to refute any of my premises, child man?
 
I thought the red man didn't have the concept of landed property. Notwithstanding the 20000 years of ethnic cleansing, mass enslavement, genocide, and colonial settler imperialism they waged on each other competing for territory before the white man showed up.

See faggots like Tommy like to believe the Injun was innocent of all that white supremacist behavior, but in reality the only difference between the red man and the white was that the white man's civilization was so much more advanced that he defeated the red man for good all over the continent, while no Injun tribe was ever advanced enough to do that to all the other tribes.
What’s your opinion on Eastern Orthodoxy?
I know too little about that to really have a strong opinion. No doubt the Eastern Orthodox church played a similar role in the empires of eastern Europe and western Asia as the Catholic and Protestant churches played in the Judeo-Christian settler colonial projects.


Indigenous Americans see themselves as a part of the land with responsibilities of stewardship toward it, much like the ancient Hebrews prior to Abraham.

The difference between people like me and toxic talking turds like yourself is that i don't go running my mouth stating my opinions as fact unsupported by data. Scholars say assessments like yours are exaggerated. There are few significant pre-Columbian massacre sites in North America. The Incan, Mayan and Aztec cultures were very bloody and expansionist, but intertribal conflict was usually worked out pretty peaceably in NA.



 
I know too little about that to really have a strong opinion. No doubt the Eastern Orthodox church played a similar role in the empires of eastern Europe and western Asia as the Catholic and Protestant churches played in the Judeo-Christian settler colonial projects.


Indigenous Americans see themselves as a part of the land with responsibilities of stewardship toward it, much like the ancient Hebrews prior to Abraham.

The difference between people like me and toxic talking turds like yourself is that i don't go running my mouth stating my opinions as fact unsupported by data. Scholars say assessments like yours are exaggerated. There are few significant pre-Columbian massacre sites in North America. The Incan, Mayan and Aztec cultures were very bloody and expansionist, but intertribal conflict was usually worked out pretty peaceably in NA.



You fucked a dog though. Anything you say is invalidated by that. Molest any teenage girls lately, Thomas?
 
I know too little about that to really have a strong opinion. No doubt the Eastern Orthodox church played a similar role in the empires of eastern Europe and western Asia as the Catholic and Protestant churches played in the Judeo-Christian settler colonial projects.


Indigenous Americans see themselves as a part of the land with responsibilities of stewardship toward it, much like the ancient Hebrews prior to Abraham.

The difference between people like me and toxic talking turds like yourself is that i don't go running my mouth stating my opinions as fact unsupported by data. Scholars say assessments like yours are exaggerated. There are few significant pre-Columbian massacre sites in North America. The Incan, Mayan and Aztec cultures were very bloody and expansionist, but intertribal conflict was usually worked out pretty peaceably in NA.



Oh I have some Purepecha ancestry Thomas, I mean I’m mostly white (like you) but I am descended from the only enemy the Aztecs could never conquer if only partially and they also sacrificed people. They admit this, but many of their prisoners were also sacrificed by the Aztecs. That’s just how it goes.

It’s funny you also say Orthodox had such a role, that was the law of the day among every Empire, not just Orthodox and a conversion to Orthodoxy meant that in time you’d be free from slavery and treated rather well if you were a conquered people. Not the same as under Islam or even Zoroastrianism I might add. Furthermore, what the Russians did to the Tatars, was largely a reaction to the previous Tatar yoke and slave raids.
 
I know too little about that to really have a strong opinion. No doubt the Eastern Orthodox church played a similar role in the empires of eastern Europe and western Asia as the Catholic and Protestant churches played in the Judeo-Christian settler colonial projects.


Indigenous Americans see themselves as a part of the land with responsibilities of stewardship toward it, much like the ancient Hebrews prior to Abraham.

The difference between people like me and toxic talking turds like yourself is that i don't go running my mouth stating my opinions as fact unsupported by data. Scholars say assessments like yours are exaggerated. There are few significant pre-Columbian massacre sites in North America. The Incan, Mayan and Aztec cultures were very bloody and expansionist, but intertribal conflict was usually worked out pretty peaceably in NA.



Scholars with the same ideological ball sucking bent as you cannot erase tribes like the Seminole and Cherokee saying in their oral histories that they were driven from their ancestral homelands near the Great Lakes by other Injuns (imperialism, ethnic cleansing) and making their way south to Georgia and Florida where they made new homes by driving the tribes living there out (imperialism, ethnic cleansing). Or the Comanche engaging in imperialism, ethnic cleansing, enslavement, and genocide so bad that tribes like the Apache and Lakota had to flee hundreds of miles to where they were living when whites encountered them.

Or tribes like the Anasazi and Pueblo building their cliff dwellings in badlands to try to get safety from raiders (speculated by some to be Aztecs).

Or the Iroquious and Hurons and their allied tribes ethnically cleansing and enslaving each other back and forth for decades before the Europeans showed up.

Pretty peaceably your rancid ass, Thomas. The myth of the peaceful North American Injun only exists because they were too fucking primitive to invent writing so there aren't any records, and they were doing it for tens of thousands of years so there wouldn't even be oral legends for most of it either. War was a constant fact of life for Injuns, because they are human, and humans war. All humans.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Can't you stick him under a bridge or in a cave?
I suppose we could find an island for him. It would be like Gruinard Island with the anthrax.
I thought the red man didnt have the concept of landed property. Notwithstanding the 20000 years of ethnic cleansing, mass enslavement, genocide, and colonial settler imperialism they waged on each other competing for territory before the white man showed up.

See faggots like Tommy like to believe the Injun was innocent of all that white supremacist behavior, but in reality the only difference between the red man and the white was that the white man's civilization was so much more advanced that he defeated the red man for good all over the continent, while no Injun tribe was ever advanced enough to do that to all the other tribes.
TBH, I’ve always felt like this “Native people were all peaceful maaaaaan” attitude is kind of racist. Like, oh, these simple folk, too innocent for war. It feels patronising. Like, “good thing they aren’t as smart as us.”
 
TBH, I’ve always felt like this “Native people were all peaceful maaaaaan” attitude is kind of racist. Like, oh, these simple folk, too innocent for war. It feels patronising. Like, “good thing they aren’t as smart as us.”
Much like African tribes woke people like to cherry pick their native Americans. Some tribes were fairly brutal going so far as to make slaves out of other tribes and tattoo them to show proof of ownership.
 
Much like African tribes woke people like to cherry pick their native Americans. Some tribes were fairly brutal going so far as to make slaves out of other tribes and tattoo them to show proof of ownership.
I’m very interested in the history of the slave trade and a fun fact that a lot of people with agendas won’t tell you is that some of the strongest anti-abolition voices came from African chieftains who had a good thing going from selling their neighbours to the British.

I’m not one of those people who believes the European colonial powers were good boys who did nothing wrong, but it’s also not as simple as “evil whites stealing innocent blacks.” It’s a much more complicated subject than it tends to be portrayed as.
 
And just like that, a thousand Kiwis switched off their computers, got up from their chairs, and went down to their local Catholic church to ask about the RCIA.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole