Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I'm not sure if Woke world made me MORE racist or is Woke world itself is racist.
Wokeness acts as a kind of action faking in my view. Its meant to appear revolutionary but it fundamentally offers no real challenge to power. It is diet progressivism incorporated by multinationals and governments to appear like they care when all it is are public relations (propaganda) trying to placate those who would normally criticize these institutions for their exploitation and imperialism. So yes in effect wokeness is now a cover for actual human rights violations and exploitation of slave labour. Nestle has the audacity to come out and say we support Black Lives Matter when their chocolate has literal black child slaves harvesting cacao pods in their supply chain. Next thing you know they’ll be promoting Earth Day when swathes of forest in Borneo are burned for their supply of palm oil. It really makes me cynical and it’s sad that it undermines actual belief in social justice when the causes are being performantly championed by the status quo on social media. Is it better that they are forced to acknowledge these things and say something? Sometimes I’m not so sure power dynamics are different now, a post-modern boss is no longer a boss they are a coordinator or coach and pal around ask you how was your weekend but they really are still the authority although no longer as easily recognized as such. It’s almost better to be able to see things for what they are without the glasses.

Edit: I think too when challenged a powerful entity can say on a surface level well we heard you and we did this and then a protest movements can take that as part of their victory and go home. Anything that gets at the heart of a bigger systemic problem will be obfuscated to a simple matter of carrying out small tweaks around the edges or doing performative wokeness, not sure who is buying it at this point.
FE10116D-3EF7-4D3D-888E-75E6EBE252EB.jpeg
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wyświetl załącznik 2167945

Wyświetl załącznik 2167948

Wyświetl załącznik 2167950

Why is this trending? Because someone took a plea deal and in their fantasy world that means Gaetz is suddenly guilty too.

And it's not enough to get it to trend nationally by using kpop faggots to help spam it up, they have to try and get the man's attention with it by tagging him in.

I've worked with elementary school children that were more mature than these fucks.
Is this left-wing Pizzagate?
A theory I've seen is that this is about grinding the commoners down. The nobles get to eat real meat, while the dirty peasants should shut up and eat bugs. You want hamburgers? Shut up, you only get one a month if that, prole. Also, we've increased the chocolate ration from 30g to 20g, so be thankful!

(I might be a bit MATI at this. Apologies.)

I've noted before that I'm all for alternate protein sources for use in space travel, but this is absurd in a world with arable farmland and livestock.
It's utilitarianism isn't it? If we can cram 20 billion people into the world by having most people eat bugs and live in pods that's a good thing because utility=quality of life*quantity of life, supposedly.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Is Batwoman also a billionaire “philanthropist” like Bruce Wayne.
No. The first one from the show was his cousin who took over just because Batman was missing, then she got replaced by the new black actress whose backstory is literally that she was a drud dealing criminal and the batsuit and whatever crash landed near where she was slumming, and so she became batwoman.
 
I don't think the different denominations are what really caused the problem. The problem really started with the churches trying to appease the general population rather than actually preaching the scriptures. Most modern western churches aren't even Christian anymore, it's just hippieanity.
I was just shitposting you know. Also Luther wrote some pretty cool shit when he wasn't just nailing shitposts to church doors.

It's utilitarianism isn't it? If we can cram 20 billion people into the world by having most people eat bugs and live in pods that's a good thing because utility=quality of life*quantity of life, supposedly.
This assumes the average net value of a human life is positive, though. Suppose it is actually negative. If that is the case, then exterminating the entire human race would be a net benefit. Quod erat demonstrandum, bitch.
 
It’s like these moral crusaders trying to censor media think they are protecting us from the world and don't want adults to use their own brains to interpret culture in a modern day context. Decolonize Shakespeare gtfo racism has always existed it wasn’t even always based on skin colour but Shakespeare has been universally adapted and sometimes done better by others like Japanese film director Kurosawa. Shakespeare in that sense is a living changeable thing, what are these barriers even to Shakespeare besides the dated language which is still important for learning English. Where I’m living the provincial school board actually dropped Shakespeare to replace it with First Nations literature. They didn’t have to get rid of Shakespeare though.
You know what the overlap between "Shakespeare" and "British colonialism" is? I went and googled it. 6 years, at the end of his life. That's it, that's the period during which English colonialism was occurring, while he was still on this mortal coil.

Edit - We're finally getting a handle on a worldwide, potentially lethal pandemic, and can start relaxing the masking and social distancing requirements, so naturally, this is bad, because even good things will always be horrendously negative for wammen -
1621295786009.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I hope we'll see more people with opinions like this in the near future.
It's actually fairly amazing to see that even someone raised on a diet of Harry Potter can reason their way out of the sheer insanity of CRT. This shit benefits nobody. Even someone in the target population that supposedly benefits from this shit can see it's actually bad for even them.

This woman actually reminds me of someone who may have inadvertently redpilled me. She was a black woman, too, in my study group in law school, and often took contrarian opinions. She argued Brown v. Board of Education was wrongly decided and actually just made white people even more bitter and hostile, when racial harmony would have otherwise come about without being forced by the federal government.

Imagine proto-SJW me sputtering and losing my shit at encountering this opinion. And not being able to yell "you're fucking a white male!" And not even having a strong argument against this. And being a white male trying to argue against a black woman. On specifically a racial issue.

She didn't actually believe this, she just knew she could win the argument. This is how lawyers think.

If you can't argue for an opinion you completely disagree with, you are not a lawyer.
 
Edit - We're finally getting a handle on a worldwide, potentially lethal pandemic, and can start relaxing the masking and social distancing requirements, so naturally, this is bad, because even good things will always be horrendously negative for wammen -
Wyświetl załącznik 2178648
How dare you say a nice thing to me, random stranger! I have beautiful eyes?! How dare you find something about me PLEASING!
 
How dare you say a nice thing to me, random stranger! I have beautiful eyes?! How dare you find something about me PLEASING!
Remember the "10 hours of catcalls in NYC" video, where 95% of the comments were genuinely expressed well-wished, 4% was niggers and spics making comments about how fine she was, and 1% was the one dude that could have been either white or hispanic trying to talk to her for 2 blocks, and the whole video was like 12 minutes, despite the woman allegedly having walked for 10 hours through NYC? If they made that video now, the CRT SJWs would have that broad and everyone associated with the video cancelled for racism against joggers.
 
It's actually fairly amazing to see that even someone raised on a diet of Harry Potter can reason their way out of the sheer insanity of CRT. This shit benefits nobody. Even someone in the target population that supposedly benefits from this shit can see it's actually bad for even them.

This woman actually reminds me of someone who may have inadvertently redpilled me. She was a black woman, too, in my study group in law school, and often took contrarian opinions. She argued Brown v. Board of Education was wrongly decided and actually just made white people even more bitter and hostile, when racial harmony would have otherwise come about without being forced by the federal government.

Imagine proto-SJW me sputtering and losing my shit at encountering this opinion. And not being able to yell "you're fucking a white male!" And not even having a strong argument against this. And being a white male trying to argue against a black woman. On specifically a racial issue.

She didn't actually believe this, she just knew she could win the argument. This is how lawyers think.

If you can't argue for an opinion you completely disagree with, you are not a lawyer.
I'm very tired, so this won't be long but I really liked your post. That woman in your study group in law school... we need more people like her.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole