💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku AJ 447
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    549
I don't find it that repulsive... True, it tastes more like some kind of lemonade than actual beer, it's not something I would drink enough to actually get drunk but it's OK for some late evening movie seance - at least you're sure you'll remember the ending.

Coors light is available here, I'll give it a shot.
I can't promise that you will like it but it has been a good daily drinker for me. Hell I don't necessarily like it.

@DocHoliday1977 I just pulled two racks of baby backs off of the smoker. What are you having for supper. Ramen perhaps. Possibly a cup of noodles. With your negative three hundred dollar monthly income you certainly aren't eating near as well as me.
 
@DocHoliday1977 I just pulled two racks of baby backs off of the smoker. What are you having for supper. Ramen perhaps. Possibly a cup of noodles. With your negative three hundred dollar monthly income you certainly aren't eating near as well as me.
Go find another woman to entertain you.
 
I can do better than you, Tony. You are a faggot. Curse you to hell.
Noodle is not a faggot and Pam could never do better. Noodle munches the baby back rib as Pam munches on hatred. Who wins. You decide. I got the kids yoohoo's. I'm going to steal one. This is my last post tonight. I've got shit to do. I have to be a responsible parent and all and make sure my kids are fed and the leftovers are preserved. You continue wallowing in your hate. I love it. My grandkids will fuck with you and you will never do so much as to reproduce. You are a genetic dead end as my genes reproduce and prosper. No matter what, my genetics win in the end.
 
@Cup Noodle Tony Robbins, you are nothing but trash with money. T R A S H.
I'm not Tony Robbins, but this is correct. I am trash with money. I worked hard all of my life to get that money. You haven't done a damn thing in your life. I may be trash with money, but you are just trash.

I can't imagine the most saddest pathetic thing of a man with alot of money begging a woman for pussy and love...and not getting it. I guess you can't buy love or class, Tony oh, @Cup Noodle. Perfect account for you, you weak watery limp noodle.
Unlike you, I've got shit to do. I'm actually leaving now. I'll let you thirst after my dick another day. I'm closing the browser.
 
Noodle is not a faggot and Pam could never do better. Noodle munches the baby back rib as Pam munches on hatred. Who wins. You decide. I got the kids yoohoo's. I'm going to steal one. This is my last post tonight. I've got shit to do. I have to be a responsible parent and all and make sure my kids are fed and the leftovers are preserved. You continue wallowing in your hate. I love it. My grandkids will fuck with you and you will never do so much as to reproduce. You are a genetic dead end as my genes reproduce and prosper. No matter what, my genetics win in the end.
Tony Robbins, does your wife not satisfy you anymore?

Unlike you, I've got shit to do. I'm actually leaving now. I'll let you thirst after my dick another day. I'm closing the browser.
Probably not. Seeing as how I've turned you down every single time.
 
Sorry. I don't know what deal you've made by trying to dupe me into having sex with these limp noodles, but it "ain't" happening.
I definitely don’t think about you sexually or want to. You’re repulsive to me and many others on this site.

The only one who shoehorns sex in your thread is you and you’re disgusting. No one likes it sleazy eezy.
 
Being raped is a crime
Being raped is not a crime. Raping is.
It's unprotected speech. It's blatant criminal speech.
False. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), Milkovich v. Lorain Journal, 497 U.S. 1 (1990), Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970), Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (1974), Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988 )
It's not even hyperbolic, it's an outright criminal statement.
What do you consider a criminal statement?
I know too little about American law to make any sensible comment about it
I assure you, Pam is once again wrong. She thinks that her hurt feelings should overwrite over 50 years of Supreme Court decisions on freedom of speech and criminal speech.
Again, this thread makes me a target. I don't enjoy it.
Then leave. You aren't achieving anything here, and if you aren't even having fun, then what's the point?
I lit into him...worse than he did to me. I held nothing back. I made him feel as useless as a human being in existence who shouldn't be in existence should feel. Then I apologized. That's the reasoning behind the lawsuits.
Tldr: Pam says lawsuits are about revenge, and established herself as a bad faith litigant if this was to be shown to any american court.
You've put me in danger with this thread.
You made death and rape threats.
False.
You've refused to delete this thread and cease your threats.
1. We can't.
2. Protected.
You've accused me of schizophrenia and other illnesses.
We (or at least I am) are protected under all the caselaw I showed. I make sure to not do anything illegal. That being said, under The Atlanta Journal-Constitution v. Jewell, 251 Ga. App. 808, 555 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001) you might be considered a limited purpose public figure, and then we get even more protections (such as actual malice and all relavant SCOTUS caselaw concerning actual malice (such as, for example New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968 ) ) )
YOU WILL PAY ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, buddy
Nope.

Btw, since you like Giuliani news so much, pam, have this:
 
Then leave. You aren't achieving anything here, and if you aren't even having fun, then what's the point?
It's threats and slander against my life. And threats against my livelihood if I refuse sex.

We (or at least I am) are protected under all the caselaw I showed.
No you are not. You are being protected from prosecution because Kyle Sapp, Joe Skeens, and Jay Stewart and Brian Kemp are protecting you from criminal charges. I need to make sure these men lose their jobs because they have refused to take up my case and follow Georgia criminal law statutes in favor of being buddies with criminals like Harvey Weinstein, Alan Dershowitz, Tony Robbins and Donald Trumps dipshits.

I'll see to it their reputations are damaged permanently for making such poor professional decisions.
 

Pam, the US census is so over that the results have been released already. You’re not fooling anyone.

and your janitorial position at the local special education school hasn’t been active for almost a year.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole