Being raped is not a crime. Raping is.
It's unprotected speech. It's blatant criminal speech.
False. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), Milkovich v. Lorain Journal, 497 U.S. 1 (1990), Greenbelt Co-Op. Publ. Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U.S. 6 (1970), Letter Carriers v. Austin, 418 U.S. 264 (1974), Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988 )
It's not even hyperbolic, it's an outright criminal statement.
What do you consider a criminal statement?
I know too little about American law to make any sensible comment about it
I assure you, Pam is once again wrong. She thinks that her hurt feelings should overwrite over 50 years of Supreme Court decisions on freedom of speech and criminal speech.
Again, this thread makes me a target. I don't enjoy it.
Then leave. You aren't achieving anything here, and if you aren't even having fun, then what's the point?
I lit into him...worse than he did to me. I held nothing back. I made him feel as useless as a human being in existence who shouldn't be in existence should feel. Then I apologized. That's the reasoning behind the lawsuits.
Tldr: Pam says lawsuits are about revenge, and established herself as a bad faith litigant if this was to be shown to any american court.
You've put me in danger with this thread.
You made death and rape threats.
False.
You've refused to delete this thread and cease your threats.
1. We can't.
2. Protected.
You've accused me of schizophrenia and other illnesses.
We (or at least I am) are protected under all the caselaw I showed. I make sure to not do anything illegal. That being said, under
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution v. Jewell, 251 Ga. App. 808, 555 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001) you might be considered a limited purpose public figure, and then we get even more protections (such as actual malice and all relavant SCOTUS caselaw concerning actual malice (such as, for example New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S. 727 (1968 ) ) )
YOU WILL PAY ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, buddy
Nope.
Btw, since you like Giuliani news so much, pam, have this: