- Dołączono
- 10 Sty 2020
The amount of contradictions and blatant bald ass assertions in this one post is absolutely mind-blowing. All in favor of renaming the No True Scotsman fallacy the "No True Stream Regular Fallacy?"
So on the whole wanting to see Phil rage makes you a troll thing, in Phil's gin soaked mind if you vote for something because you want to see him rage then you aren't a true fan and a dirty troll. However, if its the Rage-A-Thon and you vote for a game that makes him rage it has to be for the sole purpose of over the top "Whaaaaaat? Cahmaaaaan dooood that was bullshit hahaha" type of rage not the type of rage that makes Phil legitimately angry, despite the fact that is what he is known for. So if you voted for Team Fortress 2 you wanted to see him rage and if you liked it then you are a troll.
This is why Phil loses so many supporters and fans over the years because he labels you into this camp where if you dont agree with him he will insult you and then paint you with a broad stroke as a troll or detractor who personally hates him and wants to see him suffer. I'm sure there are certain fans of his like that who want to see him rage so they can point and laugh but I hate how Phil has to be so literal and serious all the time. Why bother doing viewers choice or rage-a-thons? How about he asks his fans to pick a list of five games and then he chooses the top three that interest him?