Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿
Remember when the Democrats changed confirming federal judges to a simple majority vote instead of the 60 previously required because they had a waning senate majority for 5 seconds? Remember how instead of trying to find centralizing figures that'd get a few Republicans to cross the aisle Obago found the shittiest shitlibs he could ferret out to ram them home? Pepperidge farm rememebers.
Robbespierre wound up in a guillotine, Ms. wall-hitting bartender. Remember that.
1. The media are dead set on getting a Democrat elected and it doesn't matter if it's Biden
2. As for why Biden? A couple of reasons:
A. Obama won control over the DNC from the Clintons after the mid-terms.
B. Obama let Hillary stab Biden in the back in 2013/14 (forget which year) when Biden put out feelers to run as a spoiler for Hillary's coronation, going so far as to manufacture a fake story where his dead son Beau's dying deathbed wish to his dad, was to "keep Hillary from being handed the nomination on a silver platter" to create momentum for Biden to break the faustian bargain Hillary forced Obama to concede to where she would be his heir to the throne, in exchange for Hillary not burning the DNC to the ground in 2008 when Obama beat her in the primary. Since then, Obama has come to the opinion that he fucked up and that had he betrayed Hillary and backed Biden full on and ensured he got the nomination instead of Hillary, that Biden would have won in 2016. So he gave the order that anointed Joe the nominee.
Everyone knows Joe's a horrible pick, that the Democrats and their media cronies even know this, but don't care because Obama and the fact that Obama's relitigating his own failure to stop Trump in 2020 as far as him "redoing" the election with Joe due to his guilty feelings that backing Hillary was the wrong thing to do.
I called the Biden fix ever since he announced he was primarying. I had a small waiver of faith when Buttfuckgig stomped him Iowa and he got jewed out of New Hampshire, but once he came back in the Carolinas it was clear they'd fixed the bugs in the voting machines and everything went Joe.
Its as you said:
There are two competing camps in the DNC, The Clinton Camp and (basically) a group rallying around Obama, with the vast bulk of higher teir party being fair-weather siding with the victors. Hilary struck a deal for being Secretary of State & getting the 2016 run in exchange for backing Obama.
Hilary getting BTFO in 2016 and a bunch of mentally deranged preening retards getting elected to the house further erroded the Clinton Camp's control.
Biden is the Obama camp's attempt to show they have what it takes to keep winning, and sideline the Clinton faction for good. The Clintons are letting them do it because they know Joe is a shit pick and will likely lose to Trump, giving them good odds in 2024 to put their own "Obama" out front - it seems unlikely they'd try HRC again, but hey they've managed to keep Joe from completely losing it.
This is basically what I've been saying for quite awhile when people keep acting shocked that the Democrats keep making decisions that will probably hand Trump a second term. Literally why should they care if they win the White House back next week? Four more years of Trump isn't exactly the worst thing for them. Immigration isn't going to come to a halt even if it does slow down (and you can be assured that that the numbers will go up again when people chill out about Covid). The demographics will still be getting more and more brown between white boomers heading to the great Walmart in the sky, and non-whites outbreeding (and increasingly interbreeding with) whites.. A new crop (and as you pointed out, they're increasingly and will soon be, forever, majority brown) of young voters will have turned 18 for the next election and everyone one after that.
"Oh no, four more years of the Orange Man" really just means they get to harp on about "white supremacy" and a "need for diversity" for another (almost) half a decade while America keeps on its steady march towards Brazilification. The higher ups in government and in business understand this about demographics. Republicans understand that their base is being decimated and Democrats understand that they've already succeeded in crippling it in the long term (other than the vocal group of actual retards who think that the Klan is about to start descending on everyone like it's a uncovered white linen scene from Red Dawn). And literally everyone, not even people involved in business or politics knows that every group has explicit mainstream advocates except for whites (and that it won't change any time soon). Furthermore lets face it, the Republicans aren't exactly staunch defenders of conservatism nor is Trump, and post-Trump they're going to cuck out even more than they did before probably.
Now of course the new big block of America seems to be hispanics and they're still a little more conservative but unlike white people they have a lot more in group preference (and a lot less outright hostility towards their own). It might sound a bit like I'm contradicting the final part of my first paragraph here, but maybe the Democrats/left won't just steamroll everything post-2024 but only because the Republicans/right will slide so far over in terms of idpol to cater to the new big group in a few generations. Both parties and all sides can be assured to assure more gibs, more quotas over bullshit, etc.
There's one wild card: Scarcity. You can't hand out gibs if there are no more gibs to hand out, and if you have a large welfare state with infinite immigration, you'll soon find yourself with no more gibs to hand out. There's also the chance that violence against whites will cause them to radicalize and start showing in-group preference, especially in rural areas. Then you've got the fact that Millennials only have 4 percent of the US's wealth, meaning they're 4 times poorer than the Boomers were at their age. Globalism has absolutely decimated the working class and the marriage rate has dropped like a stone, leaving a lot of unmarried young men around. That's a recipe for future unrest. COVID has taken away a lot of the bread and circuses that kept young people pacified and so a lot of them have joined left wing activism orgs and are protesting in the streets. More unrest. Granted, there's enough wealth still left in this nation to keep the status quo going for a long while, but with Trump out of office and a bunch of disgruntled people on both sides of the political aisle wanting to seize the reins of government to push their political agendas and punish their enemies, things will get hairy.
Someone in the threat said the Democrats want to Brazilify the US, and that couldn't be more accurate.
They look at the situation in South American countries and say "Yes, that. I want that". The leader ship is old money. They will be the ones in the nice safe gated communities where the cops will DEFINTELY show up and chase off the scary darkies. They don't care what the nig-nogs get up to in the working class neighborhoods. They don't care. They have a ready voting block, and various lower classes to play off each other to ensure power never really changes hands.
They hand out gibs because it buys them power. "We couldn't survive without our welfare and Section 8!" and never stop to think that its a fucking problem their survival depends on someone else.
Much like in Banana Republic shitholes (sorry my South and Central American posting friends, but you know its the truth) they will use the fear of the removal of gibs to control their plantation niggers, and then use the fear of feral nogs to keep the middle class from doing anything as it is slowly squeezed dry.
Man, I find myself on the opposite end of my parents it seems when it comes to discussing Trump. I started a debate with them, and I admit, I lost pretty badly.
They brought up how Trump doesn't exactly seem concerned with uniting the nation so much as presenting his image, hasn't given up his tax records in three years, saying that while Biden has, Trump is gonna wait until after the election (which they see as him hiding something), hasn't properly addressed the white supremacy groups or done much to oppose them, pointed out the images of all those crying kids who have been separated from their parents due to the latter being deported (living conditions matter less than being with their loving mom and dad, as opposed to being orphaned or in foster homes), and in general, believe that he lacks integrity as a leader, having done more to divide when he should be making steps to unify the country, which they believe he could do, but deliberately doesn't.
When I asked them about the media bias and the like, they also acknowledged that, saying they go for one's they believe are a bit more credible, like AP, FOX and the BBC. In general, they aren't gonna vote for Trump.
Again, I didn't really know what to say to all that. What all could I bring up for the opposite side? Especially since they want me to think more for myself and to not believe everything I see on the internet?
This is basically what I've been saying for quite awhile when people keep acting shocked that the Democrats keep making decisions that will probably hand Trump a second term. Literally why should they care if they win the White House back next week? Four more years of Trump isn't exactly the worst thing for them. Immigration isn't going to come to a halt even if it does slow down (and you can be assured that that the numbers will go up again when people chill out about Covid). The demographics will still be getting more and more brown between white boomers heading to the great Walmart in the sky, and non-whites outbreeding (and increasingly interbreeding with) whites.. A new crop (and as you pointed out, they're increasingly and will soon be, forever, majority brown) of young voters will have turned 18 for the next election and everyone one after that.
"Oh no, four more years of the Orange Man" really just means they get to harp on about "white supremacy" and a "need for diversity" for another (almost) half a decade while America keeps on its steady march towards Brazilification. The higher ups in government and in business understand this about demographics. Republicans understand that their base is being decimated and Democrats understand that they've already succeeded in crippling it in the long term (other than the vocal group of actual retards who think that the Klan is about to start descending on everyone like it's a uncovered white linen scene from Red Dawn). And literally everyone, not even people involved in business or politics knows that every group has explicit mainstream advocates except for whites (and that it won't change any time soon). Furthermore lets face it, the Republicans aren't exactly staunch defenders of conservatism nor is Trump, and post-Trump they're going to cuck out even more than they did before probably.
Now of course the new big block of America seems to be hispanics and they're still a little more conservative but unlike white people they have a lot more in group preference (and a lot less outright hostility towards their own). It might sound a bit like I'm contradicting the final part of my first paragraph here, but maybe the Democrats/left won't just steamroll everything post-2024 but only because the Republicans/right will slide so far over in terms of idpol to cater to the new big group in a few generations. Both parties and all sides can be assured to assure more gibs, more quotas over bullshit, etc.
Republicans already use idpol with "Blacks for Trump" and "Latinos for Trump" and other shit to troll the left wing. However it could serve as a future blueprint for the GOP to expand their coalition.
I doubt it might happen in a second Trump term unless Pelosi fucks off, is that immigration restrictions are passed heavily to save the country from going to shit.
Republicans already use idpol with "Blacks for Trump" and "Latinos for Trump" and other shit to troll the left wing. However it could serve as a future blueprint for the GOP to expand their coalition.
I doubt it might happen in a second Trump term unless Pelosi fucks off, is that immigration restrictions are passed heavily to save the country from going to shit.
I don't accept assholes as leaders or elected representatives. Nor should you.
Trump is acting on a world stage. "Everybody" else on the planet thinks he's a ridiculous clown. Lol, maybe you don't care about the reputation of the American president? Some of us do.
Keep thinking back on Trump's campaign promises. Did he "build the wall"? Bring good jobs back to America? Rebuild our roads, airports, manufacturing?
Try and to think for yourself and make your own decisions, CivilianOfTheFandomWars. Our democracy depends on it.
I called the Biden fix ever since he announced he was primarying. I had a small waiver of faith when Buttfuckgig stomped him Iowa and he got jewed out of New Hampshire, but once he came back in the Carolinas it was clear they'd fixed the bugs in the voting machines and everything went Joe.
Its as you said:
There are two competing camps in the DNC, The Clinton Camp and (basically) a group rallying around Obama, with the vast bulk of higher teir party being fair-weather siding with the victors. Hilary struck a deal for being Secretary of State & getting the 2016 run in exchange for backing Obama.
Hilary getting BTFO in 2016 and a bunch of mentally deranged preening retards getting elected to the house further erroded the Clinton Camp's control.
Biden is the Obama camp's attempt to show they have what it takes to keep winning, and sideline the Clinton faction for good. The Clintons are letting them do it because they know Joe is a shit pick and will likely lose to Trump, giving them good odds in 2024 to put their own "Obama" out front - it seems unlikely they'd try HRC again, but hey they've managed to keep Joe from completely losing it.
Someone in the threat said the Democrats want to Brazilify the US, and that couldn't be more accurate.
They look at the situation in South American countries and say "Yes, that. I want that". The leader ship is old money. They will be the ones in the nice safe gated communities where the cops will DEFINTELY show up and chase off the scary darkies. They don't care what the nig-nogs get up to in the working class neighborhoods. They don't care. They have a ready voting block, and various lower classes to play off each other to ensure power never really changes hands.
They hand out gibs because it buys them power. "We couldn't survive without our welfare and Section 8!" and never stop to think that its a fucking problem their survival depends on someone else.
Much like in Banana Republic shitholes (sorry my South and Central American posting friends, but you know its the truth) they will use the fear of the removal of gibs to control their plantation niggers, and then use the fear of feral nogs to keep the middle class from doing anything as it is slowly squeezed dry.
I like how the fear of niggers being imported is almost universal in the West. Tucker talked about one day China being the new superpower.
On a side note, I will be looking forward to how the downfall of the West started with a heavy interest in importing niggers rather than helping their nations become prosperous.
I like how the fear of niggers being imported is almost universal in the West. Tucker talked about one day China being the new superpower.
On a side note, I will be looking forward to how the downfall of the West started with a heavy interest in importing niggers rather than helping their nations become prosperous.
Nigger importation has always been a thing. There was a small deescalation in Europe in the 1800s where true nigger work was done by the niggers in their home territories, but there was a definite importing of nigger, principally those swarthy Moorish Italians.
China will never become a super power.
This not to say that the world might not be subject to a chinktocracy, it won't be China, as China has no interest in being a world super power, they want to govern their shit and be left alone. The history of china is a history of ignored innovation. The only time they tech up is when they get their shit pushed in and taken over and are forcibly upgraded. China hit the bronze age and then stopped - while the rest of the world went through the Iron Age, the Chinese continued to do exactly how they'd done for the previous thousand years. They had gun powder, paper, and a water-clock before almost anyone and did nothing with them. They sent expeditions to India and Africa, established relations...and then did absolutely nothing to follow up on them.
China survived by developing an extremely efficient bureaucracy. So efficient that any conqueror had no choice but to use it.This has led to a very interesting long-view by your average slope, but I'll stop that tangent there
That said, it was China that provided the resources, manpower, and engineering expertise that allowed the Mongols to push in the shit of nearly the entirety of Asia, so I am definitely not saying China isn't a strategic asset, just that they have no interest in innovation.
There's a solid argument to be made that the CCP is not Chinese and is simply another external invader that has taken over and is using China.
But the CCP in itscurrent iteration cannot become a world superpower, and the reason for that is like all communists, they only survive by squashing anyone more talented then they are and gulaging anyone smart enough to question the current world order. The CCP is doing as well as it is doing by capitalizing on Chink families to get them to spy and steal, because all nations are temporary, your family is forever.
That said, just because they can't become a super power doesn't mean they can't effectively cripple the west.
Foreigners (usually South Americans) will occasionally use 'USAn' or 'United Statesian' to refer to Americans because they're incredibly buttmad about America claiming an entire hemisphere as an endonym. Every time you see it it's pure cope and seethe over irrelevance.
The news media in those places is like a funhouse mirror of the demented media in the US, so naturally they're going to be exposed to the same insanity we see over here.
I love how her profile photo looks almost nothing like her. That is unless she's had a nose job and lost 50lbs in the last 2 years. The article isn't even about Barrett, its about how awful white people are. It seems she writes a lot on how awful whites are.
"Trump and Republicans killed 100,000 to confirm Amy Comey Barrett. They traded lives that you can't get back for that judge. Vote them out." k8ctylWxdYEGlIZG.mp4
Chris Hayes needs to be put into the woodchiper so they can bring back Keith Olbermann. Atleast he had a better voice, even if he has the same crazy.
So with all the media and the like constantly pointing out how much Trump is an evil person yada yada yada, what all can we list that he has done right during his presidency?
The CCP is bribing corrupt african governments (i repeat myself) to extract resources and ensure they are economically subservient to China for the next 50 years, but they are far from taking over - they know better, Africa is full of niggers.
