- Dołączono
- 2 Mar 2020
I wonder if 'nonbinary' men and women are outright rejected because of their exceptional identities, or if they're only "rejected" in that they'd have to join priesthood programs for their actual sex and they refuse to do so. It's like that chick a few years back who whined that she couldn't open a bank account because she had to list herself as either male or female, and she refused to fill out the forms because correctly recognizing her sex would inflict narcissistic injury- I mean, literally kill her because of dysphoria or something.I met a ‘non-binary’ today. Now let me just say I clocked him as an FTM immediately when I saw him but didn’t know him, but 99% of people would think oh, a manlet. It was really weird. Here’s this guy looking like a construction worker in his paint stained jeans and Timberlands and talking about how he works as a contractor and then is...non-binary? Is a ‘they/them’? It was the total opposite from the usual.
He also whined that he couldn’t enter a monastery because they don’t admit non-binaries (and like...probably wouldn’t admit FTMs either). This was an Episcopal monastery, so I’m glad mainline Protestants are cracking down a little. And the Diocese of Atlanta wouldn’t sponsor him for the priesthood for the same reason (The Episcopal church ordains women, but clearly there’s a line being drawn).
There’s a difference between female enbies who have sex with men and those who don’t, regardless of how they look, because of the risk of pregnancy.
But male spaces in general are pretty uncompromising when it comes to fakebois. Unlike women, men don't feel the need to play mommy to troons and make their spaces inclusive for them. That's probably why these fujoshi-to-manlets are so vicious towards other women and relentless about forcing the "pregnant person" and "vagina-haver" language- they have absolutely no power over men, and have to overcompensate with the power they do have over other women.
Ostatnio edytowane: