Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Hat
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
In the insane world of troon logic, where the people pushing hardest for this are all, like Labelle, people who have no children and do not work with children, it would work like this:

Kid, Age 3: "I'm Spider-Man!"
Parents: "Yes, you are!" <calls kid "Spider-Man" ever after, calls daycare and makes them call him Spider-Man, marks clothes "Spider-Man">
Sensible people: "Why are you calling him Spider-Man"?
Parents: "He wanted that to be his name. We only changed it socially. If he wants to change it back he just has to say!"
Sensible people: "Hey kid, are you Spider-Man? How do you know?"
Kid, Age 4: "I'm Spider-Man. Of course I'm Spider-Man, I've always been called that. Everyone calls me that. Why do you ask?"
Now the parents have to experiment on the child to change him into Spider-Man. He has to get his daily radioactive spider bites and dilate his web shooters or they'll close up. His powers don't really work like Spider-Mans and are a cheap imitation and people often can't recognize he is Spider-Man without him telling them he is. Seeing anything to do with the real Spider-Man causes anxiety and frustration. Ultimately he realizes that he is a pale shadow of Spider-Man and medical science can't change him into the real thing and he is forced to deal with the irreversible changes to body. This is all because his parents never told him he was actually just Timmy, a regular 8 year old boy.
 
Now the parents have to experiment on the child to change him into Spider-Man. He has to get his daily radioactive spider bites and dilate his web shooters or they'll close up. His powers don't really work like Spider-Mans and are a cheap imitation and people often can't recognize he is Spider-Man without him telling them he is. Seeing anything to do with the real Spider-Man causes anxiety and frustration. Ultimately he realizes that he is a pale shadow of Spider-Man and medical science can't change him into the real thing and he is forced to deal with the irreversible changes to body. This is all because his parents never told him he was actually just Timmy, a regular 8 year old boy.
Actually, that’s pretty close to the story of Spider-Man.
 
Psych.jpg
 
The reason men are expected to keep their emotions in check is (to the best of my knowledge) twofold: cultural, and evolutionary. The cultural reason is because men traditionally are expected to be the "solid rock" of the family, remaining steady even if/when things start coming apart at the seams; if the man breaks down, the family has no anchor in whatever storm is buffeting them. The evolutionary reason stems from caveman times, when the men hunted violent animals like mammoths; having an emotional breakdown in the middle of a hunt would lead to less food for the tribe.
Boys are expected to keep their emotions in check so they can grow up to become those men that women and children can depend on, both to provide an emotional anchor and provide physical sustenance come thick or thin.
Regardless of what Labelle and his fellow femboy troons think, stoicism is not refusal to acknowledge your emotions. It is acknowledging your emotions, and refusing to let them have power over you.
 
The reason men are expected to keep their emotions in check is (to the best of my knowledge) twofold: cultural, and evolutionary. The cultural reason is because men traditionally are expected to be the "solid rock" of the family, remaining steady even if/when things start coming apart at the seams; if the man breaks down, the family has no anchor in whatever storm is buffeting them. The evolutionary reason stems from caveman times, when the men hunted violent animals like mammoths; having an emotional breakdown in the middle of a hunt would lead to less food for the tribe.
Boys are expected to keep their emotions in check so they can grow up to become those men that women and children can depend on, both to provide an emotional anchor and provide physical sustenance come thick or thin.
Regardless of what Labelle and his fellow femboy troons think, stoicism is not refusal to acknowledge your emotions. It is acknowledging your emotions, and refusing to let them have power over you.
Also there is healthy and unhealthy amount and ways to do this, just like being emotionally expressive. Sometimes you should let your emotions run, take strength and drive from them, let others know how you feel and why. Other times your feelings are unhelpful and you should push them down, work on them later or never depending on what's going on. Then there are situations where both approaches can be made to work or it's unclear what is needed. This why all adults should encouraged to learn both control and express themselves while finding witch way is more natural to them, witch I think they are most parts nowdays. Sure there are some double standards like girls tend to get away with being way more emotinal but then again nobody likes hysterical and insecure bitch. I do wish that people took male mental health more seriously and looked in ways that help them better what we currently have.
 
The reason men are expected to keep their emotions in check is (to the best of my knowledge) twofold: cultural, and evolutionary. The cultural reason is because men traditionally are expected to be the "solid rock" of the family, remaining steady even if/when things start coming apart at the seams; if the man breaks down, the family has no anchor in whatever storm is buffeting them. The evolutionary reason stems from caveman times, when the men hunted violent animals like mammoths; having an emotional breakdown in the middle of a hunt would lead to less food for the tribe.
Boys are expected to keep their emotions in check so they can grow up to become those men that women and children can depend on, both to provide an emotional anchor and provide physical sustenance come thick or thin.
Regardless of what Labelle and his fellow femboy troons think, stoicism is not refusal to acknowledge your emotions. It is acknowledging your emotions, and refusing to let them have power over you.
Aren’t these also the people who laugh about “toxic masculinity” and “male fragility?” It’s fine for men to show their emotions, as long as it’s the correct sort.
 

Yeah that's a repost.

I'm sure I did an edit about letting your sons become football players in response.

EDIT: Yeah, this one.

Assigned%20Male_zps1sw9dehb.jpg


Fuck you Yankees, it's football here.
 
Aren’t these also the people who laugh about “toxic masculinity” and “male fragility?” It’s fine for men to show their emotions, as long as it’s the correct sort.
Yup. Men are constantly being told to show more emotion by women who promptly use those emotions against them. Not all women by any means, but it doesn't take many to encourage men to not try being vulnerable again. This is something I've seen a few women explicitly state they do, as well - get men to open up so they have ammunition against them in fights later, or once they've opened up they find the man less attractive.

It also doesn't help that, to these same people, men are regarded as wanting to fuck everything that moves. Which is treated as disgusting male gaze objectification and rape culture if they're just talking to a woman, and secret slash sex fantasy if they're talking to a man.

So you're right. It is very much a case of 'show more emotions, but only the right ones - the ones we tell you to have'.

Also, considering how much troons talk about punching TERFs, it's fucking hypocritical of Billy to say men need to learn to express themselves without violence.
 
Also there is healthy and unhealthy amount and ways to do this, just like being emotionally expressive. Sometimes you should let your emotions run, take strength and drive from them, let others know how you feel and why. Other times your feelings are unhelpful and you should push them down, work on them later or never depending on what's going on. Then there are situations where both approaches can be made to work or it's unclear what is needed. This why all adults should encouraged to learn both control and express themselves while finding witch way is more natural to them, witch I think they are most parts nowdays. Sure there are some double standards like girls tend to get away with being way more emotinal but then again nobody likes hysterical and insecure bitch. I do wish that people took male mental health more seriously and looked in ways that help them better what we currently have.
Also, considering how much troons talk about punching TERFs, it's fucking hypocritical of Billy to say men need to learn to express themselves without violence.
The thing about violence is that it is inherently tied to male psychology. For better or for worse, since caveman times, males have evolved to be violent- both to hunt deadly animals for the tribe, and to protect the tribe from predators and other tribes. As people grew more civilized, and when having a jolly good war was no longer possible, men turned to other ways to get their testosterone out (such as underground fight clubs.) Even as early as 40 years ago, you could challenge another kid to a fight behind the school, and more often than not, if you could put up a good fight, you'd become friends with your opponent. This is only my take, of course, but I believe that many male psychological problems can be solved by allowing some controlled physical violence- the martial arts, boxing, fight clubs, etc. Something to get it out, and bond with other men.
Of course, since men like Guillaume Labelle are cowards, they get their violent tendencies out by going after women (because not only will a man hit back, but a man can and will do actual damage. There's a reason the old witch hunts were directed at women.)
 
The thing about violence is that it is inherently tied to male psychology. For better or for worse, since caveman times, males have evolved to be violent- both to hunt deadly animals for the tribe, and to protect the tribe from predators and other tribes. As people grew more civilized, and when having a jolly good war was no longer possible, men turned to other ways to get their testosterone out (such as underground fight clubs.) Even as early as 40 years ago, you could challenge another kid to a fight behind the school, and more often than not, if you could put up a good fight, you'd become friends with your opponent. This is only my take, of course, but I believe that many male psychological problems can be solved by allowing some controlled physical violence- the martial arts, boxing, fight clubs, etc. Something to get it out, and bond with other men.
Of course, since men like Guillaume Labelle are cowards, they get their violent tendencies out by going after women (because not only will a man hit back, but a man can and will do actual damage. There's a reason the old witch hunts were directed at women.)

One of the major problems for men these days (well boys) is the lack of male role models.

If you’re a boy with divorced parents, chances are that you’re living with your mom most of the time. You go to preschool or kindergarten... Where the staff is mostly women. Then school, where most of your teachers are women (at least until high school). Your mom is busy at work, so after school you might go to a club or after school activity: With more women looking after you.


Well gee, gender disparities in education and childcare? Sounds like something feminists might have something to say about, amirite?

Nah! Ask a feminist (never mind Labelles loony toons kind) and the only gender disparity they want to talk about is the “sexy” kind that benefits them: The lack of women in STEM and boardrooms.

So instead they fall back on their trite, old stereotypes: “Toxic masculinity”.
 
I mean at least it's not another JK Rowling rant but Peterson hasn't been relevant for years and hating on someone who's at rock bottom like that is pretty low.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole